Democratic and Republican U.S. senators introduced legislation on Wednesday to end the National Security Agency’s bulk collection of Americans’ communication records and set other new controls on the government’s electronic eavesdropping programs.

The measure introduced by Democrats Ron Wyden, Mark Udall and Richard Blumenthal, and Republican Rand Paul, is one of several efforts making their way through Congress to rein in sweeping surveillance programs…

“The disclosures over the last 100 days have caused a sea change in the way the public views the surveillance system,” said Wyden, a leading congressional advocate for tighter privacy controls, told a news conference.

The surveillance programs have come under intense scrutiny since disclosures this spring by former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden that the government collects far more Internet and telephone data than previously known.

The legislation introduced on Wednesday combines several surveillance reforms that legislators had introduced separately.

Besides banning the bulk collection of Americans’ records, it would create the position of “constitutional advocate” to represent the public in the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that oversees the eavesdropping programs.

And it would let Americans affected by the eavesdropping sue for damages in U.S. courts and allow companies to disclose more information about cooperation with government surveillance.

In a 217-205 vote in July, the House narrowly defeated an amendment to an appropriations bill that would have sharply limited the NSA’s ability to collect electronic information.

The strong support for the amendment – bolstered by an unlikely alliance of liberal Democrats and libertarian Republicans – surprised many congressional observers because House leaders and members of the Intelligence Committee had strongly opposed it.

Think the bill will pass? Do you think a bipartisan coalition will carry it through to law?



  1. Derek says:

    Protection of citizen’s rights? Not under this administration!

    • Bob says:

      Oh you mean the Patriot act..yeah previous administration! W. had that one.

      “USA PATRIOT Act:roving wiretaps, searches of business records (the “library records provision”), and conducting surveillance of “lone wolves”—individuals suspected of terrorist-related activities not linked to terrorist groups.” Etc, Etc..

      • Mextli says:

        I’m glad someone got it right. Barry said the same thing.

      • bob says:

        It was re-authorized under Obama. The problems with section 215 and others, as they were being abused by the NSA, were never addressed. There is plenty of blame to go around.

  2. NewformatSux says:

    There already is a group handling privacy at NSA. Lanny Davis was on it. The Constitutional Advocate position, filled by Barack Obama, would advocate for the people the same way Obama promised to.

  3. Tim says:

    A bipartisan coalition won’t agree to anything that threatens to breech the containment of the Satan Clause pre-cog in that horrible NSA machine.

    “”…It’s called ‘Shitter’. Wires are grafted harmlessly into your skull and any thought you have is uploaded directly to all your Shitter followers…

    The quintessential NSA-themed Southpark
    http://southparkstudios.com/full-episodes/s17e01-let-go-let-gov

    Butters converting Jehovah’s Witnesses: “”Can I ask you something? When is the last time you’ve visited your local DMV?…..Would you like to read some DMV liturature?…

  4. Carrie Mathison says:

    No laws will affect what is collected. A new law will just prompt a new excuse for that which is being scooped, and/or drive it further underground where another Snowden wouldn’t be able to know about or disclose it. The security state is already out of control and no one in Washington will be able to slow it down significantly.

  5. Rex says:

    I hope our congressmen understand that this data collection system will eventually be used against them. With this much power the NSA will be running the show.

  6. Dallas says:

    I would like see Congress pass stricter laws against NSA eavesdropping.

    Even though Congress and not POTUS can make this happen, the sheeple will think Obama is responsible for protecting the rights of Americans.

    This could be a good thing to ensure a Hillary landslide victory against the Canadian Teapublican nominee.

    • Tim says:

      ‘Sheeple’ need a better representative to speak for them than one who sells cheap HUD housing conveyor systems which lead them into rotating knives while they watch calming images of mediterranian scenery — and, they can’t even enjoy that because every word you say keeps making them ‘wake up’.

      • Dallas says:

        I like your humor. Aldo, Watch out for the illegal Mexican in here. He’s not right. Well, he’s ‘special ‘

    • NewformatSux says:

      >I would like see Congress pass stricter laws against NSA eavesdropping.

      Obama has announced he is against such things. There has been a shocking decline in the quantity and quality of you bootlicking.

  7. Bignumber says:

    Like it matters if it does, there is no law anymore.

  8. NewformatSux says:

    Pay attention. This is a time of crisis, and according to your fellow editor Mark Perkel, during times of crisis, the President can ignore the Constitution. Really those who are presenting this bill are guilty of treason. Just ask your fellow editor for the details.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 4637 access attempts in the last 7 days.