Google Inc. cut its taxes by $3.1 billion in the last three years using a technique that moves most of its foreign profits through Ireland and the Netherlands to Bermuda.
Google’s income shifting — involving strategies known to lawyers as the “Double Irish” and the “Dutch Sandwich” — helped reduce its overseas tax rate to 2.4 percent, the lowest of the top five U.S. technology companies by market capitalization, according to regulatory filings in six countries.
“It’s remarkable that Google’s effective rate is that low,” said Martin A. Sullivan, a tax economist who formerly worked for the U.S. Treasury Department. “We know this company operates throughout the world mostly in high-tax countries where the average corporate rate is well over 20 percent.”
The U.S. corporate income-tax rate is 35 percent. In the U.K., Google’s second-biggest market by revenue, it’s 28 percent.
Google, the owner of the world’s most popular search engine, uses a strategy that has gained favor among such companies as Facebook Inc. and Microsoft Corp. The method takes advantage of Irish tax law to legally shuttle profits into and out of subsidiaries there, largely escaping the country’s 12.5 percent income tax.
The earnings wind up in island havens that levy no corporate income taxes at all. Companies that use the Double Irish arrangement avoid taxes at home and abroad as the U.S. government struggles to close a projected $1.4 trillion budget gap and European Union countries face a collective projected deficit of 868 billion euros.
The high corporate tax rate in the U.S. motivates companies to move activities and related income to lower-tax countries, said Irving H. Plotkin, a senior managing director at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s national tax practice in Boston. He delivered a presentation in Washington, D.C. this year titled “Transfer Pricing is Not a Four Letter Word.”
“A company’s obligation to its shareholders is to try to minimize its taxes and all costs, but to do so legally,” Plotkin said in an interview.
Administration Concerned
While the administration “remains concerned” about potential abuses, officials decided “to defer consideration of how to reform those rules until they can be studied more broadly,” said Sandra Salstrom, a Treasury spokeswoman. The White House still proposes to tax excessive profits of offshore subsidiaries as a curb on income shifting, she said.
Read the article. There are days I feel like I have “SUCKER” stamped on my forehead.
bobbs, didnt’ you recently say vote the incumbents out? an since the primaries are history, how could we vote for the “least objectionable” democrat?
bobbopolar==quite correct. I’m just a changey hopey guy.
No reason/not possible for you to read all the threads here for the past 6-8 weeks but the Teaparty candidates are as corrupted by the money as anyone else. Not crazy enough to bite the hand that feeds them so I’m back trying to thought experiment my way into what “WE THE PEOPLE” can actually do to bring change to our government. Ideas like institute cumulative voting or all other suggestions I have read here (except for MINE)require the filibuster breaking super majority vote of the very people that power would be taken from. Think that will work?
So what can we the people do?
While the two political parties are more the same than different, they are different. Republicans are EXCLUSIVELY for the top .1 per cent of Rich Bastards who will never get into heaven. Democrats are also for the top .1 per cent but every once in a while they throw a scrap of benefit on the floor for us to fight about.
Unless you are in the top .1 per cent of wealth hoarders in the USA, there is no reason to vote Republican, so voting them in when they are the least qualified candidate (aka liebertardians and teabaggers) is not the best strategy. Third Party/write ins tend to elect the worst opposing candidates. No, the only rational thing WE CAN ACTUALLY DO, is vote in the least objectionable democratic candidate.
Life sucks, but its what we gotta deal with.
#31
VOTE THE LEAST OBJECTIONABLE DEMOCRAT INTO OFFICE.
Backpedaling FTW!
I’ll say it again, and I won’t change my line:
Replacing plutocrats with new plutocrats will solve NOTHING!
We need a new constitution and a new form of government for The Republic to survive.
Cursor_
Cursor==are you missing the entire point on purpose?
What is your clever devious plan?
Is your plan as clever as a weasel?
“I won’t change my line.”/// What are you, in a two-step with Alfie?
Silly. RTF post.
#33
True I should not have criticised your changing your point of view.
But on the other hand, trolls trolling trolls is always fun.
Cursor_
Cursor–that wasn’t hard was it? Seeing an error and correcting it should be more fun than calling other people trolls who are not, just because you fancy yourself one. ie=I’m not a troll, and neither are you.
All things are definitional. I have used my definition consistently. I don’t even think Alfie is a troll. He is a true believer. Stupid, but true. Trolls have to be smart enough to change what they post in order to get the reaction. Supple in mind-a required element in knowing what you know and changing your mind.
With the number of federal income non taxpayers approaching the critical mass of 50%, in our nation’s history we have never needed the fair tax more than now. See http://www.christianretirement.com “Learn to Say No.” America is experiencing problems in many areas. Sometimes, difficult issues must be addressed head on. The Fair Tax would insure that everyone would have the opportunity to step up and pay for the freedoms they so readily and freely enjoy.