Can’t be happy

U.S. ruling in Apple case bolsters Web reporters – Technology – International Herald Tribune This is good news for web reporters and bloggers alike.

SAN FRANCISCO A California appeals court has ruled that online reporters are protected by the same confidentiality laws that protect traditional journalists, striking a blow against efforts by Apple Computer to identify people who leaked confidential company data.

On Friday, the three-judge panel in San Jose overturned a trial court’s ruling last year that to protect its trade secrets, Apple was entitled to know the source of leaked data published online. The appeals court also ruled that a subpoena issued by Apple to obtain electronic communications and materials from an Internet service provider was unenforceable.

In its ruling, the appeals court said that online and off-line journalists were equally protected under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

“We can think of no workable test or principle that would distinguish ‘legitimate’ from ‘illegitimate’ news,” the opinion states. “Any attempt by courts to draw such a distinction would imperil a fundamental purpose of the First Amendment,” which guarantees freedom of the press. The ruling states that Web sites are covered by California’s shield law protecting the confidentiality of journalists’ sources.



  1. DavidtheDuke says:

    That isn’t a real picture is it? Just making sure.

  2. Rick says:

    I’m one of the classic Apple junkies…fanboys…whatever you call it…and even I’m glad it went this way…

  3. Angel H. Wong says:

    Screw him, he’s as nasty as Bill Gates (he just dresses better than bill gates.)

  4. Uncle Dave says:

    #1: It does make him look like a Klingon, doesn’t it?

  5. Eideard says:

    From some experience on the corporate side of things, it’s clear why Apple has to file legal moves like this. Ascribing it to Jobs’ [or Gates’} persona is fine for folks enamored of some Wallt Disney theory of history. Like avenging Davy Crockett is why we should own Texas!

    From the viewpoint of journalists and bloggers who are serious about journalism, it’s probably 100 times more important than the case might be for Apple. Barely a hiccup for their legal department.

    Of course, looking around this “room”, we only have one serious journalist. That’s John, of course. The rest of us offer one or another useful skill that supports what John wants to do with this blog. That’s true whether we’re OS X/Mac users or Windows/PC users.

  6. Rick says:

    He’s seriously not that cranky…which is too bad.

  7. Simon says:

    What a great pic!
    I think this is a good ruling.

  8. Steve Jobs portrayed as Hans Conreid (dated reference alert!).

  9. Uncle Dave says:

    So, John. Jobs will end up looking like Uncle Toonose? (even more dated reference–damn I’m getting old)

  10. Yoda says:

    Actually, Hans Conried was one of the best pantomime quiz show contestants there was. It was amazing to watch him. No, Steve and Bill are not in the same league as Hans. Hans had character albeit silly.

  11. Hal Jordan says:

    RAY FOR PRESS OR PSEUDO-PRESS FREEDOM!!!~

  12. Rube says:

    So this means industrial espionage is OK now, as long as you have a blog? Cool!

  13. Rick says:

    No (#13), it means it is still legal for the press to talk about something illegal without having to disclose where they heard about it….that seems pretty different from making industrial espionage legal…

  14. DBR says:

    He looks like the T Rex from the JP movies.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 4382 access attempts in the last 7 days.