High-production cows cloned at University of Tennessee

From the quiet of a high-security lab, away from the furore about human ethics and religious castigation, some of the world’s cloning experts have come together on a groundbreaking project.

Working to order, the scientists receive shipments of tissue from around the world, grow them and freeze them in liquid nitrogen, leaving the cells in suspended animation until word comes to revive them and create clones.

Bankrolling the effort is the US billionaire John Sperling, who owns tissue stored in the lab’s alarm-fitted “cryotanks”. The tissue was taken from his dead dog Missy, and sits alongside slithers of tissue from other pets, mostly cats and many from Britain, their donors the living, the lost and the run-over.

For those involved, this is the future of cloning. While the world’s attention is focused on whether scientists should be allowed to clone human embryos to make potentially life-saving stem cells, the cloning experts at Sperling’s company, Genetic Savings and Clone, have seen the future and decided it’s fluffy.

The cloning effort is more than amusement for exceptionally rich and sentimental animal lovers. By commercialising cloning, Sperling’s company is taking steps to turn the tedious, painstaking black art of cloning out of the hands of lab experts and into a high-throughput money-making process

The company has started charging for cloning. So far it has created six cats for pet owners who do not believe nine lives are enough. The first clients paid $50,000, a fee that dropped to $32,000 last year.

The “winners” in science — those who set cultural standards — often are those who figure out how to make a buck from leading edge research.



  1. Gary Marks says:

    I want them to stop wasting their efforts cloning cows. They need to rush to genetically engineer a FARTLESS COW. Everyone knows farting cows cause global warming.

  2. rwilliams254 says:

    Good to go. Capitalism runs the economy. If people are willing to pay that then let them. As long as private industry isn’t subsidized, then go for it.

  3. RTaylor says:

    What can’t be overcome is that when you clone from adult cells, the DNA has suffered the ravages of time. If you clone from preserved fetal cells you don’t have the genetic corruption, though the occasional cosmic ray could knock an atom out of place.

  4. ECA says:

    Farting Cows do, cause global warming, but IF’ we took all this gas, and used the Methane, we WOULDNT have ANY energy problems…
    But, big companies DONT WANT you to know this…

    From 2000-2004 they Used LESS cattle, to make MORE milk(that isnt any good) and created MORE Manure, then EVEr before…
    In 1 county in Idaho….From 1998-2004, the Main polutant was Cow dung. at an estimated 20,000,000 TONS…and NO-ONE uses it to create power.
    Even California didnt want ALL these cattle, so they MOVEd to Idaho…

    They just install wind mills, and the power company is having a FIT, and dont want ANY new alternatives…They dont mnd the COAL plant that wants in(heavy metals polution)(no COAL in idaho), but thay are fighting the alcohol plant, and the methane generation…

  5. joshua says:

    did they clone the harnesses as well?

    I love the name of his company……..*Genetic Savings and Clone*

  6. Mr. H. Fusion says:

    Sounds like a great idea until some bug comes along that wipes out the whole herd. Because their is no genetic diversity left, so goes our dependence on cattle.

  7. ECA says:

    the COW, is a genetic waste of time.
    we have inbred it, conditioned it, and processed its Life to the extent that we FEED it, its neibhors after they have died, standing NEXt to it.

    We have homogenized, pastureized, and done everything we CAN to this beast… but we STILL want MORE from it.

  8. Angel H. Wong says:

    So you can finally say that you’ve ate the same chicken over and over?


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 5698 access attempts in the last 7 days.