The Republican big-wigs are falling all over themselves blaming each other for the Palin fiasco. Nothing like building party unity for winning the next election through no-holds barred, bare knuckle fighting each other in public.

A hard-hitting piece on Sarah Palin in the new Vanity Fair has touched off a blistering exchange of insults among high-profile Republicans over last year’s GOP ticket – tearing open fresh wounds about leaks surrounding Palin and revealing for the first time some of the internal wars that paralyzed the campaign in its final days.

Rival factions close to the McCain campaign have been feuding since last fall over Palin, usually waging the battle in the shadows with anonymous quotes. Now, however, some of the most well-known names in Republican politics are going on-the-record with personal attacks and blame-casting.

So what is Palin up to? From the fascinating Vanity Fair article:

In the aftermath of the November election, the conventional wisdom among Palin’s supporters in the Republican establishment was that she should go home, keep her head down, show that she could govern effectively, and quietly educate herself about foreign and domestic policy with the help of a cadre of experienced advisers. She has done none of this. Rather, she has pursued an erratic course that, for her, may actually represent the closest thing there is to True North. […] She created a political-action committee—Sarahpac—with the help of John Coale, a prominent Democratic trial lawyer. But just months into its existence the pac’s chief fund-raiser, Becki Donatelli, a veteran of Republican campaigns, suddenly quit. One person familiar with the situation told me that Donatelli could not stand dealing with Palin’s political spokeswoman in Alaska, Meghan Stapleton, who has drawn withering fire from Palin friends and critics alike for being an ineffective adviser. Also with Coale’s help, Palin formed the grandiosely named Alaska Fund Trust, to defray a reported half million dollars in legal expenses arising from a slew of formal ethics complaints against her in her home state—prompting yet another formal complaint, that the fund itself constitutes an ethical breach. Onetime supporters have become harsh critics. Walter Hickel, 89, a former two-term governor and interior secretary, and the grand old man of Alaska politics, who was co-chair of Palin’s winning gubernatorial campaign, in 2006, now washes his hands of her. He told me simply, “I don’t give a damn what she does.”

And on and on… So, do you think Palin will run for Prez in ’12?




  1. #135 – LL,

    I wasn’t refuting your statement. I was merely taking it as an invitation for open season on libertarians the same way you were stating your opinion of liberals. I was hoping you might see how far off the mark your claims about liberals were if I made similar claims about libertarians.

    I guess my ridiculous claims were not far from the mark. Yikes!!

  2. LibertyLover says:

    #136, But I wasn’t off the mark with Liberals.

    It makes you feel good to take money from people to help other people, right?

  3. #137 – LL,

    No. You are way off the mark with liberals. Sorry. I may be closer with my remarks about libertarians than you are with your remarks about liberals, though I wasn’t trying to be.

  4. LibertyLover says:

    #138, So, it makes you feel bad to take money from someone to give to someone else to help them out?

  5. #139 – LL,

    You just love to put words into the mouths of others. No. I don’t have any strong feelings about it at all.

    It makes me feel bad to pay my own money to give to oil companies to make their executives wealthy and to support a dying energy source.

    It makes me feel bad to pay my own money to blow people up in a foreign country without adequate reason.

    It makes me feel bad to pay my own money to give it to wealthy executives of health insurance companies for the purpose of NOT providing me health care.

    It makes me feel bad to pay my own money to provide military escort to oil tankers when there is plenty of money in the corporate coffers for them to pay for the service.

    And yet, I do all of these things every single day.

    I would rather our tax dollars go to help people in need.

    I would rather pay the U.S. government personally for my health insurance since the person deciding whether or not I get care will at least have the job title of providing rather than denying care.

    I would rather have corporations pay for dumping their waste products, regardless of whether they are PCBs, mercury, or CO2. Why is the last of these different?

    There are a great many things I would prefer to see differently.

    Taxing wealthy individuals to provide a minimum safety net for those less fortunate does not bother me. Providing a service like health care for all, would actually increase my own personal liberty tremendously AND LOWER ALL OF OUR INDIVIDUAL BILLS. Sometimes, we can find win-win situations where we actually take less money from people and provide more. Health care is a prime example.

    Does that clear things up sufficiently for the moment?

  6. LibertyLover says:

    #140,

    Providing a service like health care for all, would actually increase my own personal liberty tremendously

    Taking money from other people to increase your own personal liberty doesn’t strike you as being selfish?

    I’m selfish but I don’t expect others to give me what they have.

    Everything else in your post, to me, seemed nothing more than a justification for that one desire — your ego “wants” therefore “it is the right thing to do.”

    That is the point I was trying to make.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 5659 access attempts in the last 7 days.