“Clean Coal” Air Freshener Ad Created By The Coen Brothers

By Uncle Dave Friday February 27, 2009

Here’s the website and org that created the video to oppose the oxymoron of “clean coal.”

37 Comments

Misanthropic Scott says:

3/2/2009 at 10:30 am

#33 – Paddy-trZEROll,

C’mon Paddy, you’re so full of shit now that the whites of your eyes have turned brown.

Admit it. You had no idea what hominids existed in the evolution of humans and which ones are or are not considered our ancestors.

There is absolutely zero evidence, as yet, of homo sapiens prior to around 200,000 years ago.

And, we’ve known for years that even Australopithecus Afarensis walked fully erect.

So, when you’re drooling on yourself saying “heh heh heh … he said erect … heh heh heh” pick up a book on human evolution and get a clue.

Or, if you prefer to start with human evolution for dummies, here’s a pretty decent wikipedia page.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolution

Note that homo sapiens goes back about 200,000 years, as I stated. You, on the other hand, are merely trying to hide your stupidity … and are failing miserably.

BTW, they haven’t found any pre-cambrian rabbits yet. I bet you’re still expecting one of those too, right?

And, stop drooling on your keyboard. When you say LOL or ROFL to everything, especially when you’re flat dead wrong, it just makes you look like an even bigger idiot.

Drooling is not a way to make a point. When will you learn that? Post a link when you’re trying to contradict something. That will make points far better than drooling on your keyboard.
Paddy-O says:

3/2/2009 at 10:34 am

# 34 Misanthropic Scott said, “There is absolutely zero evidence, as yet, of homo sapiens prior to around 200,000 years ago.”

Actually, footprints that are 1.5 million years old that are the same as modern humans and don’t match footprints of any other hominid qualifies as HARD evidence.

ROFL!
bobbo says:

3/2/2009 at 10:37 am

WHAT???? Drooling doesn’t earn points?

Why that lowers Paddy’s score below zero? How can I post to him if he’s below zero?

Maybe like his posts, imaginary numbers?
Misanthropic Scott says:

3/2/2009 at 12:13 pm

#35 – Paddy-trNEGATIVEONEll,

Clearly you’ve got some reading comprehension problems. Let’s try this again. I’ll type very slowly since I know you can’t read very fast. Emphasis in the quoted sections is mine.

The researchers identified the footprints as probably belonging to a member of Homo ergaster, an early form of Homo erectus. Such prints include modern foot features such as a rounded heel, a human-like arch and a big toe that sits parallel to other toes.

By contrast, apes have more curved fingers and toes made for grasping tree branches. The earliest human ancestors, such as Australopithecus afarensis, still possessed many ape-like features more than 2 million years ago — the well-known “Lucy” specimen represents one such example.

See, when comparing homo erectus feet to that of non-human apes, their feet look just like ours. That doesn’t make them homo sapiens.

Modern foot features means similar to homo sapien feet, not necessarily actual homo sapien feet.

Modern feet mark just one of several dramatic shifts in early humans, specifically regarding the appearance of Homo erectus around 2 million years ago. Homo erectus is the first hominid to have the same body proportions as modern Homo sapiens.

Translation: Homo erectus footprints look like modern human footprints. It doesn’t mean they were homo sapiens.

Modern feet were just one of several features making homo erectus more like homo sapiens. There are other features as well.

Got that?

And still drooling like a moran and not posting links just makes you stupid, in this case, stupid and wrong.

Got a link that says otherwise? Please share. Perhaps you should learn to read though. You seem to be having some trouble.