Interesting system we have. Insurance companies stretch out the process in hopes you die before they have to pay on a claim. Of course, that is if you or your employer can afford insurance.

They borrow leftover prescription drugs from friends, attempt to self-diagnose ailments online, stretch their diabetes and asthma medicines for as long as possible and set their own broken bones. When emergencies strike, they rarely can afford the bills that follow.

“My first reaction was to start laughing — I just kept saying, ‘No way, no way,’ ” Alanna Boyd, a 28-year-old receptionist, recalled of the $17,398 — including $13 for the use of a television — that she was charged after spending 46 hours in October at Beth Israel Medical Center in Manhattan with diverticulitis, a digestive illness. “I could have gone to a major university for a year. Instead, I went to the hospital for two days.”

In the parlance of the health care industry, Ms. Boyd, whose case remains unresolved, is among the “young invincibles” — people in their 20s who shun insurance either because their age makes them feel invulnerable or because expensive policies are out of reach. Young adults are the nation’s largest group of uninsured — there were 13.2 million of them nationally in 2007, or 29 percent, according to the latest figures from the Commonwealth Fund, a nonprofit research group in New York.
[…]
Young adults are the nation’s largest group of uninsured — there were 13.2 million of them nationally in 2007, or 29 percent, according to the latest figures from the Commonwealth Fund, a nonprofit research group in New York.
[…]
“There’s a big sense of urgency,” said Susan Sherry, the deputy director of Community Catalyst. She described uninsured young adults as especially vulnerable. “People are losing their jobs, and a lot of jobs don’t carry health insurance. They’re new to the work force, they’ve been covered under their parents or school plans, and then they drop off the cliff.”




  1. bobbo says:

    #97–Brock==thank you for providing “a recommended solution.” Yes, I think a nice little matrix could be developed about cost versus life expectation and everyone gets covered up until the money runs out, then “Sorry, no bucks for you.”

    Not addressed by “sucking it up” would be how to best spend the money that is spent on healthcare to cover more people. Once healthcare rationing was rationally addressed, I think that issue would be to!

    Best system in the World!!!!!!

  2. MikeN says:

    Bobbo, that’s right. That’s how the government has a basis for regulating private businesses. Otherwise, the most they could regulate was government actions. As is, integrationist Barry Goldwater still felt the Civil Rights Act went too far in regulating private businesses, and Rehnquist advised him it was unconstitutional, so he voted no.

  3. LibertyLover says:

    #73, As long as the money comes from what the federal gov “should” collect, then I agree with you.

    Taking the money from the states’ citizens and then turn around and tell the states to conduct their Constitutionally mandated acts as the federal government wants is wrong.

    The current crisis is a prime example. The states can’t raise taxes to fund their programs anymore because the tax base is shrinking and those who are working are already taxed to their teeth. The only thing left to do would be for the states to protect their citizens from federal prosecution for failing to pay federal income taxes so they could tax them themselves to keep the cash in-state. Far fetched, I know.

    However, if enough states look at the federal government and say, “Enough is enough!” the money will either start flowing more easily (without the 25% hicky for the federal “handling” fee), or more states are going to start bucking the system in ways previously unanticipated.

    BTW . . . here’s another one:

    http://tinyurl.com/c99thg


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 4746 access attempts in the last 7 days.