Daylife/AP Photo by Craig Ruttle
The plane being lifted from the water to a waiting barge

The pilot of the US Airways Airbus that was forced to crash-land in New York’s Hudson river after both its engines failed has told investigators he made a split-second decision to attempt a water landing to avoid a possibly “catastrophic” crash in Manhattan.

Captain Chesley “Sully” Sullenberger’s account of the landing was released as salvage crews hoisted US Airways Flight 1549 from the river and on to a barge. Investigators retrieved the plane’s black boxes, which were filled with fresh water, and sent them to Washington for analysis.

The aircraft’s torn and shredded underbelly revealed the force with which it hit the water. A gash extended from the base of the plane toward the windows, its right wing appeared charred and the exterior of the destroyed right engine apparently had been peeled off…

The pilot told investigators yesterday that in the few minutes he had to decide where to set down the plane on Thursday afternoon, he felt it was “too low, too slow” and near too many buildings to go anywhere other than the river, according to an account of his testimony to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB).

Sullenberger and his co-pilot, Jeff Skiles, who was initially flying the plane, described the moment when a flock of geese struck the passenger jet, taking out the engines. Skiles said the birds flew straight at them in perfect formation. Sullenberger said that in an instant the windscreen was filled with birds.

“His instinct was to duck,” said Kitty Higgins, an NTSB board member, recounting their interview. Then there was a thump, the smell of burning birds, and silence as both aircraft engines cut out, she said.

With both engines out, flight attendants described complete silence in the cabin, “like being in a library”, Higgins said. A smoky haze and the odour of burning metal or electronics filled the plane…

Sullenberger told investigators he immediately took over flying from his co-pilot and made a series of command decisions: returning to LaGuardia was out, as was aiming for the nearby Teterboro airport, as it would mean taking the jet over densely populated northern New Jersey.

“We can’t do it,” he told air traffic controllers. “We’re gonna be in the Hudson…”

After guiding the gliding jet over the George Washington Bridge, Sullenberger picked a stretch of water near Manhattan’s commuter ferry terminals to land. Rescuers were able to arrive within minutes…

Kudos to Sullenberger. Fine example of what being a pro is all about.




  1. Rick Cain says:

    US Airways should promote him. Thats 155 fewer wrongful death lawsuits. You can always get another plane, its insured.

  2. bobbo says:

    #31–abus==you answered NONE of the questions. Thats “ok” unless your intent was to do so.

    Ditching in the river leads me to think it doesn’t matter if the Ditch Switch is thrown or not==I would not even call it a mistake not to.

    Yes, all honest working people are under assault as a result of bad economic policy for the past years–at least since during Carter.

    It matters little what pilots have “given up.” What they make NOW is all that is relevant. No retirement huh? That sucks.

    RBG==what kind of power/control exists in this a/c after Engines are lost? Enough to lower the gear? Enough to guarantee control of flight surfaces?

    I think there are more variable trying to make it to a hard surface miles away than the river that is much closer and no fear of landing short or long? Without more info, I’d say the river was the best choice. Of course, “at altitude” with a bit of time to think and evaluate, airport landings are preferred==hence this “real” emergency.

  3. RBG says:

    34 bobbo. I don’t disagree with you. That’s why I wrote that it didn’t matter much in Sully’s case even if busdriver found he could have made a runway. One fast miscalculation or unfortunate gamble could mean a complete disaster. With that many lives at stake, you would have to be at least 99.9% certain you could make it to an airport with no surprises.

    (Which gets back to my earlier observation that it wouldn’t take much for an onboard computer to crunch all the internal and external info, including GPS, to give a running picture of what airports are within *easy* glide. All aircraft should have such a thing & not just nearest airport imho.)

    But note, if busdriver said they tried to simulate the water landing, you can be certain they investigated whether an airport landing was possible. The simulator would have all the factors you mentioned built in.

    My question was theoretical curiosity only.

    RBG

  4. US AIRWAYS 1549 DID NOT CRASH SOLELY DUE TO BIRD INGESTION.

    If you’d like the analysis of an experienced pro pilot and flight instructor, go to:

    http://us-airways-1549-crash-analysis.blogspot.com/


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 6836 access attempts in the last 7 days.