Driving to work, you notice the traffic beginning to slow. And because you have your cell phone on, the government senses the delay, too. A congestion alert is issued, automatically updating electronic road signs and Web sites and dispatching text messages to mobile phones and auto dashboards.

In what would be the largest project of its kind, the Missouri Department of Transportation is finalizing a contract to monitor thousands of cell phones, using their movements to map real-time traffic conditions statewide on all 5,500 miles of major roads.

It’s just one of a number of initiatives to more intelligently manage traffic flow through wireless data collection.

Officials say there’s no Big Brother agenda in the Missouri project – the data will remain anonymous, leaving no possibility to track specific people from their driveway to their destination.

Living where a “traffic jam” means you had to wait while the traffic light changed twice — I sort of vaguely remember things like this being a priority. But, for whom?

“Even though its anonymous, it’s still ominous,” said Daniel Solove, a privacy law professor at George Washington University and author of “The Digital Person.” “It troubles me, because it does show this movement toward using a technology to track people.”

Cell phone monitoring already is being used by transportation officials in Baltimore, though not yet to relay traffic conditions to the public. Similar projects are getting underway in Norfolk, Va., and a stretch of Interstate 75 between Atlanta and Macon, Ga.

But the Missouri project is by far the most aggressive – tracking wireless phones across the whole state, including in rural areas with lower traffic counts, and for the explicit purpose of relaying the information to other travelers.

Although most new cell phones come equipped with Global Positioning System capabilities that can pinpoint their exact locations, the tracking technology used for transportation agencies does not depend on that.

Instead, it takes the frequent signals that wireless phones send to towers and follows the movement of the phones from one tower to another. Then it overlays that data with highway maps to determine where the phones are and how fast they are moving. Lumping thousands of those signals together can indicate traffic flow.

The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) suggests that someone should notify cell phone owners that their phones are being monitored for traffic data.

Privacy experts also worry that the traffic monitoring could later evolve into other uses – perhaps to catch speeders or fugitives.

That’s because each cell phone has a unique serial number, in addition to its call number and a code that indicates its service provider. A cell phone company must always be able to track the location of its phones in order to know where to route a call.

“Perhaps to catch speeders or fugitives?” I don’t find that especially worrisome. Anything else come to mind?



  1. Jeff Arnold says:

    Granted, traffic in Missouri isn’t anything like in LA. In all seriousness, I have to question the wisdom of this expenditure. Like you, I suspect it’s a complete waste.

    On the other hand, it might be appropriate – maybe even prescient. Remember that Missouri is home to both Kansas City and St Louis, and that both cities make the list of 100 largest cities in the US. As of the 2000 census, the population in the Kansas City metro area was approximately 2,000,000 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas_City,_Missouri), and that number is growing.

    One good snarl, and it can, in fact, take you hours to get to work. Perhaps you could cut us hicks some slack? 😉

    -j, Kansas City

  2. James Hill says:

    Don’t be shocked by the traffic light comment. People who choose to live in California choose to live under a failed government: One where this level of thinking can’t be comprehended.

    Cities in the one to two million people range (From STL and KC to SLC and Vegas) have the proper balance of existing roads, need for future roads, and the ability to fund technology to make things like this happen.

    Cali ruined its transportation system thirty years ago, and now has too many problems to solve. Screw ’em.

  3. I live in St. Louis and have spent considerable time in Kansas City as well. I live 12 miles from work. On a bad day it can take me an hour to drive that 12 miles. On a typical day it takes 35-40 minutes. Some people deal with worse commutes every day.

    One day a couple of weeks ago I was halfway to work with my window down, traffic crawling, and the guy next to me rolled the window down and asked me if it was always like that. I said yes. And frequently I’ll be stuck on an interstate-turned-parking lot and the radio stations are reporting no problems.

    I have limited experience in Kansas City in rush hour, and it wasn’t as bad (I guess I’ve experienced KC rush hour maybe 3-4 weeks of my life) but still wasn’t ideal.

    So I would love to know how congested the roads are so I can plan accordingly.

  4. NYC area has already similar system, to the best of my
    knowledge provided by a private firm. They monitor signals
    of EZPass tags (used here to electronically pay tools at the
    bridges and such…), all over major highways, looking for
    traffic conditions… Both in cell-phone tracking case and
    in EZPAss tag case, either done by Govt. or private bussiness, I have
    one major problem: no one first ASKS if they can use your signal
    and one lesser problem, irellevant if “targets” were asked first…:
    tracking system is using service that I (we) pay for – hence
    one must be able to demand to be reimbursed if his signal is
    used in this manner. One of main “advantages” mentioned
    about EZpass tracking arround NYC, is that data “sorce”
    is free (collecting company is not part of EZpass system!).
    For that many trackings, even if paying only 1c
    per use, no one would be able to do so profitably, even Govt.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 5805 access attempts in the last 7 days.