October set a slew of trading records, mostly bad – MarketWatch — This is a fascinating article that you should read in its entirety — for entertainment purposes only.

 
Excerpt:

2. Massive daily moves in both directions sent traders reaching for the Mylanta. The S&P 500 has not had such a volatile month since November 1929, as measured by moves of at least 1% higher or lower. The Dow posted its two biggest point gains on record, climbing by 936 points on Oct. 13 and by 889 on Oct. 28. But it also posted its second-biggest point drop on record, of 733 points.

Found by John “Bear” Ligums.




  1. Paddy-O says:

    #30 J, since you have no ability to comprehend the stock market, why do you continue to post on this topic?

  2. J says:

    # 31 Paddy the Ignorant Shit Talker.

    You really are running thin on the rebuttals aren’t you?

    Would you like to compare knowledge of the stock market too Paddy Cake? I am certain you would lose so, I am game if you like.

  3. Paddy-O says:

    #32 Your response shows your lack of knowledge. Thank you for verifying it for us.

  4. James Hill says:

    Mustard, well stated! I’m with you on this one.

    J, you’re continuing to fail. Please stop. I command you.

  5. brendal says:

    Mr. Mustard and J – they got a thing…goin’ on…

  6. Paddy-O says:

    #35 A match made in Heaven or somewhere… 😉

  7. J says:

    # 33 Paddy Cake the Ignorant Shit Talker

    “Your response shows your lack of knowledge. ”

    Back it up with some evidence. Oh! That’s right. You can’t.

    # 35 brendal

    Only in your fantasies.

  8. Paddy-O says:

    #37 J said, “Only in your fantasies.”

    Or, nightmares. Shutter.

  9. Paddy-O says:

    # 37 J said, “Back it up with some evidence. ”

    You’re voting for Obama, right? And, you want the market to do well right?

  10. J says:

    # 39 Paddy Cake the Ignorant Shit Talker

    Unless you have a time machine I don’t see the validity of those questions.

  11. Paddy-O says:

    #40 J said, “I don’t see the validity of those questions.”

    That’s because you lack understanding of the stock market.

    Thanks for verifying.

  12. J says:

    # 41 Paddy Cake the Ignorant Shit Talker

    “That’s because you lack understanding of the stock market.”

    Who I vote for is only relevant if you can see into the future and evaluate the performance of the winning candidate.

    So, who I vote for and whether I want the stock market to do well are not valid as evidence of my knowledge.

    Sorry Loser! Play Again!

  13. James Hill says:

    #42 – If you’re going to steal my lines, win the argument first. You failed in epic fashion.

  14. brendal says:

    That’s it J…keep posting on Dvorak and stay out of the public.

    NOTE TO JCD: Thank you for keeping these people off the street.

  15. J says:

    # 44 brendal

    “That’s it J…keep posting on Dvorak and stay out of the public.”

    Not all of us live in our mom’s basement like you do brendal.

  16. Glenn E. says:

    It seems to me that a market correction was predicted months or years ago. And that the market was over-valued, and would return to pre-2000 levels one day. But when it threatened to occur before Wall Street insiders were ready for it, the government had to step in and save their bacon. What the hell happened to letting the market do its own thing? Why they pulled the stops off of the Default Swaps. And while that was running Wall Street amok, nothing was done to curb it. Only when collapse became unavoidable, did the US government step in to protect the major investors from bankruptcy. People are still losing their homes, jobs, pensions, small businesses. It’s 1929 all over again. Protecting the rich first. Rather than letting them suffer alone with the rest of us. This crap will prolong the “recession”, again!

  17. LibertyLover says:

    #46, You are correct.

    There was a law passed a couple of years ago that wouldn’t take effect until 2011. The bailout made them effective immediately.

    One of the most interesting parts was no longer requiring banks to keep money on hand for deposits. “We aren’t bankrupt, we’re just out of money.” There is no need for the FDIC to bailout them out if they aren’t bankrupt.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 4497 access attempts in the last 7 days.