Associated Press – May 16, 2008:
| |
<
They say Tang wanted his tenant dead because Halberstam owed him about $100,000 in rent on a showroom for his electronics business. |
0
Associated Press – May 16, 2008:
| |
<
They say Tang wanted his tenant dead because Halberstam owed him about $100,000 in rent on a showroom for his electronics business. |
Bad Behavior has blocked 4615 access attempts in the last 7 days.
Absent more facts, I support the landlord. If the tenant owes money, he should pay or be evicted. I assume the “law” does not require the former and prevented the latter leaving these good folks to their “natural” remedies.
Love to see an article on “the history” of this relationship.
Landlord probably tried to do the eviction himself and botched it. The rules of court for landlord/tenant matters in New York are pretty tough to navigate without a lawyer. Cheapskate landlord probably tried to save himself the cost of a lawyer and now he’s going to need one anyway… 😀
Bomb in Israel? Damn terrorists!
Oh … it’s a commercial tenant. That makes all the difference. Right …
The tenant may have owed $100K. The landlord does not have the right to set of explosives. Sorry landlord. I might have sided with you before the little bomb thing. Now? Um … no.
Well, that is one way to get the tenant’s attention.