Scientists at Duke University have created the first map of imprinted genes throughout the human genome, and they say a modern-day Rosetta stone – a form of artificial intelligence called machine learning – was the key to their success…

In classic genetics, children inherit two copies of a gene, one from each parent, and both actively shape how the child develops. But in imprinting, one of those copies is turned off by molecular instructions coming from either the mother or the father. This process of “imprinting” information on a gene is believed to happen during the formation of an egg or sperm, and it means that a child will inherit only one working copy of that gene. That’s why imprinted genes are so vulnerable to environmental pressures: If the only functioning copy is damaged or lost, there’s no backup to jump in and help out…

Dr. Randy Jirtle, who has studied imprinting for years, notes that imprinting is an epigenetic event, meaning it’s something that can change a gene’s function without altering the sequence of its DNA. “Imprinted genes are unusually vulnerable to pressures in our environment – even what we eat, drink, and breathe. On top of that, epigenetic changes can be inherited. I don’t think people realize that.”…

Fascinating article – and field of study. And, as Jirtle and his co-author, Dr. Alexander Hartemink, said, “We’ve certainly narrowed the field, but we have a whole lot of work ahead of us.”



  1. Improbus says:

    Man, science is cool.

  2. biohazard says:

    This the hottest field in biology now…
    it turns out nature is MUCH more complicated then anyone has ever imagined. Think of the complexity this mechanism adds to the genetic information.
    In addition to the actual code in the DNA, there is a whole network of controls on what gets to be activated and what’s not, and When ! These switches are also inherited, but not like DNA.

  3. Li says:

    Epigenetics is of personal, professional interest to me, and I find this research to be thrilling. How long before we can exactly map the environmental effects of various pollutants or dietary choices?

    Very cool.

  4. RBG says:

    Since I can’t think of anything useful to add here, let me try for something useless.

    Years ago I found I had an unexpected “opportunity” to visit the British Museum… for 20 minutes. I mean, what do you do with that? Not go because 20 minutes is the museum equivalent of blasphemy?

    I made a run for a couple Egyptian antiquities, the Elgin Marbles, a few other things and ended up at the Rosetta Stone. What amazed me about the Rosetta Stone, aside from its significance, was that it was right more-or-less out in the open where anyone can touch it. And in fact I held onto it on its worn-polished top right hand corner, like everyone else had. (Almost expecting an ear-shattering squeal à la 2001: A Space Oddessy.) Now that’s blasphemy.

    RBG

  5. Angel H. Wong says:

    All I can think of is hordes of “scientists” rushing to the nearest patent office.

  6. DeLeMa says:

    Lemme see here…you took this chick out, got hammered with her, took her home, got high, and made a baby…ok, yeah, that explains everything…
    Wasn’t there an article about pro/con drug legalization? I love Darwin.

  7. House paint says:

    Scientists are like wizards in some way)

  8. Angel H. Wong says:

    #7

    That’s why Texans shun science in favour of religion.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 11704 access attempts in the last 7 days.