There’s usually a sign either on the slot machines themselves or prominently posted in each casino that all machine malfunctions void play. Here in Nevada there have been several court cases where a reel machine malfunctioned and stopped on what appeared to be a winning combination, but wasn’t. The gamblers always lost because of that warning.

However, it’s arguable that this was a malfunction. It wasn’t set up properly, nor was it tested properly to find that the wrong chip was in it, but it didn’t malfunction, technically.

I work for a slot machine company and I know that in most, if not all, jurisdictions (can’t say about Indiana — never been there) each machine has to be coin tested to ensure it’s set up right and it’s par (payback percentage) and other information recorded by the local, state or tribal gaming commission before it can be put on the floor. If this wasn’t done, the casino is liable for a huge fine up to being shut down.

As for going after those who took advantage of this, I think a court will have to determine if it was a malfunction or the casino’s fault. If you figure out that one machine pays back more than another and continue playing it, you aren’t breaking any laws. Is this that much different? It’s just the ‘why’. On the other hand, taking ‘extra’ money from an ATM that spits out too much is illegal, I think, so this may be a related situation. Depends on the laws of the jurisdiction. On the third hand, these people who didn’t report it, kept playing and kept the winnings are amazingly stupid. With every square inch of a casino watched from multiple angles by cameras recording every move, there’s no way to escape them finding out who you are when they catch the problem. You at least knew that, didn’t you?

Is Winning on Faulty Slot Machine a Crime?

Prosecutors are considering criminal charges against casino gamblers who won big on a slot machine that had been installed with faulty software.

The machine at Caesars Indiana credited gamblers $10 for each dollar they inserted because the software wasn’t designed for U.S. currency, state police said. More than two dozen people played the machine before one gambler alerted Caesars employees.

A decision on whether to bring criminal charges could come in a couple of weeks, said John Colin, chief deputy prosecutor for Harrison County. He said “criminal intent” may be involved when people play a machine they know is faulty.

When a slot machine jams and gamblers lose money, they don’t get it back, she said.

“It doesn’t work in the reverse,” Ford said. “They need to forget it and move on.”



  1. Mac Guy says:

    Anyone else picturing Robert DeNiro when reading this story?

  2. bobbo says:

    Is it much different===the difference between being obvious and not obvious? Yes, it is different and criminal==understandable, but still criminal.

    A machine that gives 10 dollar credit for every dollar entered is “obviously” broken as is an atm machine that gives the wrong cash amount.

    I know windfalls are hard to ignore, but so is being honest hard to achieve ((ie when actual opportunity otherwise is present.))

  3. Sean says:

    #2 – … Was that translated to russian and back to english?

  4. bobbo says:

    3—I don think so. Are you referring to the story in the next thread?

  5. Ridiculous! Who in their right mind EXPECTS gamblers to be ethical?!?

    Las Vegas THRIVES on the gambler mentality which goes hand in hand with vagrancy. People who gamble are unethical. (I’m talking about the real gambler not the occasional one who does it just to say he’s done it). So you have a casino exploiting the vagrancies of man yet when one acts out his part by taking money from a broken machine they want to make this criminal? John, where’s the BS meter when we need it.

    The cameras are there for a reason. Let the guy go free and take the slot machine out of service. If the guy get punished then it definitely is a win for the side of the casino who already is having its cake and eating too.

  6. OhForTheLoveOf says:

    You guys remember 0113addiv?

    Is that you Man of Leisure?

  7. Elwood Pleebus says:

    #6 Dang I was trying to think of that guy’s name! I was thinking the same thing.

  8. Milo says:

    “one gambler alerted Caesars employees.”

    What kind of a total dork…


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 4673 access attempts in the last 7 days.