Support the Blog — Buy This Book!
For Kindle and with free ePub version. Only $9.49 Great reading.
Here is what Gary Shapiro CEO of the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) said: Dvorak's writing sings with insight and clarity. Whether or not you agree with John's views, he will get you thinking and is never boring. These essays are worth the read!
Put this ad on your blog!
Syndicate
Subscribe to Main Blog feed here:
Subscribe to Comments too (below):
Junk Email Filter
Strangest election ever.
Odds of Anthony Weiner playing major role in election is crazy.
This insanely, entertaining, election cycle of 2016 Will unfortunately be made into a Hollywood movie. Arh.
The FBI will never be seen the same after Comey’s decisions in the past year.
The Saudis must be PISSED! Losing a sleeper agent this close to the election.
Who is the agent? Let me guess, Abedin.
I agree with Hillary that the FBI should tell us what they know, but supposedly they have to comb through 650 Thousand emails that Huma claims she’s already turned over. So that’s not going to happen.
It’s time for Hillary to step aside. It’s obvious to all but the walking dead that she cannot be trusted with secure information.
I saw a Clinton apologist on CNN earlier trying to pin this on the Russians! The host didn’t even interrupt him. Walking Dead is right.
Pic of the Day: One of these things is not like the other
I give up. What is it? All three are corrupt.
Seriously? Think about it.
Actually…….as more than 38 different distinct “odd one out” facts are immediately apparent, one would have to be a complete dolt not to see the humor presented.
Of course…. you two posted.
Bill Clinton is the one who is currently married.
Anthony is the only one who is not holed up in New York too embarrassed to show his face in public.
Only one no longer has a misbehaving weiner in their pants.
The lamp?
My favorite headline?
Happy Hollow Weiner
Bill didn’t perform the wedding did he?
Yes he did.
Talk about poetic justice.
I thought this would be a minor story, but now we see that longtime Democratic supporters are abandoning Hillary. This guy was supporting her strongly on Hannity after the story broke then changed his mind over the weekend.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/10/doug_schoen_puts_his_support_for_hillary_on_hold.html
Dream on, guys. 😀
She’s still likely to win. And she will be a great role model for women and little girls everywhere.
From Wikileaks: Continuing the Dem house of snakes.
A March 12 email exchange shows Brazile stating that she received a town hall question from Roland Martin, a TV One host who co-moderated a March 13 town hall with CNN’s Jake Tapper.
A March 5 email shows that she shared a question with Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta and communications director Jennifer Palmieri that was to be asked in a March 6 debate hosted by CNN in Flint, Mich.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/31/donna-brazile-shared-additional-debate-questions-with-clinton-campaign-identified-her-tipster/#ixzz4Ofz61TQt
Did Bill have a fling with Huma before “giving the bride away” to Anthony?
Or, is Anthony misbehaving because he’s pissed at being cuckolded after Bill, Hillary and Huma became a steady ménage à trois?
This story keeps getting weirder and weirder…
The speculation in wingnut world is becoming weirder and weirder… y’all are going off the deep end! Fun to watch until some wingnut with a gun gets serious…
You’re slipping Fauxdeau, you forgot to use the terms racist, vast right wing conspiracy, and of course RUSSIANS!
I have seen you do better.
Naw Bob, now that we have the woman instead of the black guy, we’re going to have 8 years of vicious sexism instead of racism.
Glad I could straighten you out on that. 😉
Everyone knows you cant trust trust a woman to keep a secret.
http://dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1213855/Women-really-secret-Gossip-shared-just-47-hours.html
Great observation, you’re probably correct, sexism and ageism will be the underlying meme if Hill wins.
Phydeau, how do you feel about Donna Brazille feeding Crooked Hillary debate questions?
Your party can’t win on her merits, you have to cheat. Good job Dumbos.
Bob, really? You don’t think the Republicans were fed debate questions? You don’t think that goes on all the time, in both parties? Trump is being sued for child rape and is going to court for fraud over his Trump “university” and this is the best you can come up with? Really?
Just a whiny little bitch. Your candidate was fed debate questions. Its the only way she can win.
Desperation.
So why dont you answer Phydeau? Will The DNC doc your pay?
The Wiener the World Awaited
Phydeau is right. She’s still going to the win the election.
This gross election has only one thing:
America finally got the type of candidates it’s lazy, obese and unintelligent people deserve.
Both candidates are corrupt.
Both parties are corrupt.
Both political theories are corrupt.
The system is corrupt.
Whats important kiddies is not to put your party themed blinkers on but rather look at the actual laws and policies your candidate might actually push for or fight against. How would those policies if enacted ACTUALLY AFFECT YOU. Thats: YOU….not some BS childish notion of philosophy you think you believe.
Actually, I’m just seconding Hmeyers…via my own thought of the moment.
Why not come out and just say people should vote their own self interests? You’ve never been bashful about saying it before.
Thats just what I did say.
What robots you wingnuts are.
Yes you said it in your verbose, abstruse style, instead of the single sentence necessary.
And your selfish method of deciding who to hire is already used by most of the electorate; that is how you all created the failing R/D hegemony.
And what is “wingnut”? I got it that it is some sort of ad hominem insult from the context, but what does it mean?
The system is corrupt, so how do we fix it? Get money out of politics is a huge step. So why are the Republicans so dead-set against it? The Democrats are the ones working to clean things up.
Why does your Republican party want to keep things corrupt? Think about that when you vote.
Hillary takes pay for play money from every terrorist nation in the world. You’re beyond an idiot.
Avoiding the question, Bob. All politicians suck up to money people nowadays because that’s how the game is played. Why do Republicans want to keep the game this way and Democrats don’t?
Answer the question, pal.
1. Trump is not a politician
2. He has not taken pay for play money from any terrorist countries.
3. WTF are you talking about?
The Clinton’s are the worst offenders when you are talking about money in politics.
Saying Democrats trying to clean it up shows that you either are the dumbest person to ever own a computer, or your a paid shill.
Well looky here… speaking of corruption. Looks like a computer in the Trump organization has a super-secret connection to a Russian bank, Alfa Bank:
http://slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/cover_story/2016/10/was_a_server_registered_to_the_trump_organization_communicating_with_russia.html
Now why would an American businessman have such a super-secret connection to a Russian bank? What is Trump hiding? Why won’t he release his tax records?
This is the guy you want as president? Really?
Another interesting tidbit from the article:
So someone in the Trump organization is chatting with Russians about election-related events?
This is the guy you want as president? Really?
Har…Slate.
FIVE separate FBI cases are probing virtually every one of Clinton’s inner circle and their families
Read more: http://dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3889994/Influence-peddling-acting-Putin-s-ally-hiding-classified-secrets-sexting-FIVE-separate-FBI-cases-probing-virtually-one-Clinton-s-inner-circle-families.html#ixzz4OljIM0Kv
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Bring it on, Bob. Y’all have been investigating the Clintons for decades, proclaiming how corrupt they are and that any day now they’ll be caught. Nothing so far. They’re not saints, they’re politicians and as such a little sleazy like all politicians. But not on the same level as Trump.
NYT: Investigating Donald Trump, F.B.I. Sees No Clear Link to Russia
Again you’ve been discredited, this isn’t even fun anymore.
http://nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/fbi-russia-election-donald-trump.html?_r=0
From your article:
The FBI didn’t explain why the number of contacts consistently increased around the time of significant campaign events, like the conventions. So yeah, they “doubt” it.
Funny how you’re so ready to believe the FBI when it says things you agree with. And when it doesn’t (Clinton not guilty on classified info) you’re quick to accuse the FBI of selling out. 🙄
“Funny how you’re so ready to believe the FBI when it says things you agree with. ”
No one believed Comey (not even Comey apparently), when he said he didn’t have enough evidence to bring charges…..except for morons like you.
What’s funny is how you believe wild conspiracy theories when they suit your narrative.
That chart does not line up with the description of increased chatter around significant campaign events. Take a look and see if that makes sense.
Everything described there, sounds like what a hacker would do:
Configured something like a digital hotline connecting the two entities, shutting out the rest of the world, and designed to obscure its own existence.
How did these scientists get their hands on these communications?
Because no disguise is perfect… read the original Slate article to see how the security experts stumbled upon it.
Washington Post lists Slate as the leftmost media publication that exists. Go ahead and read it, its a real eye-roller.
Sucks to be Phydeau:
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
http://nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
Where was that reported on Slut? Hmmm, what? It wasn’t? POOOOTINNN!
Woohoo! Nice haul eh Phydeau! Get the money out of politics eh Fido?
Hillary’s Two Official Favors To Morocco Resulted In $28 Million For Clinton Foundation
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/31/hillarys-two-official-favors-to-morocco-resulted-in-28-million-for-clinton-foundation/#ixzz4OnrvNyLS
Keep posting Phydeau, for every one you have on Trump I will have One hundred on the Clinton Crime Syndicate. And, unlike you, I do this for free.
That pic is PRICELESS! ILMAO!
… No really! President “Pussy Chaser” ties the knot between Mister “Dick Pic” and Huma Abedin. I wonder if there were CIGARS after the ceremony. It could be why Huma decided to try and sabotage Hillary’s campaign.
As bad as the whole campaign has been from start to now…in just the last day and looks like it will continue, lots of substantive DIRT is coming out on both candidates. The Clintons use power to gain money to gain more power to gain more money. I think it started with Hillary, but Slick Willy quick on the uptake, and now with Daughter Chelsea.
I’ve posted it before: I think “the worst” case for the Clinton is they lie, cheat, steal ONE BILLION DOLLARS for themselves. Pretty bad. But………………………… Trump is worse. He will cost the economy 4 Trillion dollars in tax breaks to his ilk in order for himself to gain a few more 100’s of millions of dollars. Thats just the economic/tax policies. What he will do on every other policy is TOTALLY UNKNOWN. I like what Chelsea Handler said last night on Real Time with Bill Maher: “I don’t trust a person who doesn’t drink.” ….its ok if you used to have a problem and are now on the wagon…. but to avoid such experiences throughout your whole life is a red flag. I think that is true…. in a vacuum of stalwart behavior to contraindicate that.
In the Main what we have is: Hillary = corrupt and self seeking. Trump = Fantasist Nut Ball. The choice: is clear.
When you have a candidate who drinks and one who doesn’t, isn’t the non-drinker the safer choice? The effects of alcohol on thinking, what if it happens at a dangerous time? Who’s going to protect us from drunk-nuking?
NFS—really. Look. At how you “think.” No subtlety at all. No nusance. Its 100% bumpersticker labelling all the way down.
Most characteristics fall on a continuum. Most pedants, shills, operatives, talking heads, leaders, partisans, liars, ..etc talk and characterize at the extremes.
The opposite of NEVER drank is indeed ALWAYS DRUNK. Not the issue at all. OF COURSE: anyone who is always drunk is not to be trusted. Its not mentioned, as they are always drunk… too drunk to run for office.
Now—-TRY FOR JUST ONE FUCKING ONCE to imagine all that area in the middle.
Can you do that spunky?