British Citizen and CNN television host Piers Morgan is engaged in a hostile attack against the U.S. Constitution by targeting the Second Amendment. We demand that Mr. Morgan be deported immediately for his effort to undermine the Bill of Rights and for exploiting his position as a national network television host to stage attacks against the rights of American citizens.
Har! Sign the petition here.
For Kindle and with free ePub version. Only $9.49 Great reading.
Here is what Gary Shapiro CEO of the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) said: Dvorak's writing sings with insight and clarity. Whether or not you agree with John's views, he will get you thinking and is never boring. These essays are worth the read!
Subscribe to Main Blog feed here:
Subscribe to Comments too (below):
Bad Behavior has blocked 5329 access attempts in the last 7 days.
Exercising your constitutional freedom of speech will get you deported!
America is such a farce, hypocrite and self-deceitful, it’s sad.
Ditto. If he did something illegal, deport him. If not, let him stay. What sheeple think has nothing to do with it.
The fact that your own government (not mine since I don’t hire D-Rs) is sponsoring this, is highly suspicious. This seems like a precursor to using the site to promote it’s own (unconstitutional) agenda.
There is no right to free speech in England.
He did not break the law and nobody is suggesting he should be arrested.
He’s a guest. He is not an American citizen the last I heard. If he makes himself into an unwelcome guest he can be asked to leave.
When I looked at the petition it was almost twenty thousand names short. Most Americans are pretty tolerant even when it comes to bad guests.
deowll, like herpes, once a GWB Republican, always one.
Yes, by GWB Retardican logic he has no rights and should be held in gitmo, …
And then there is this American company CNN, that does have First Amendment right of freedom of Press.
The GWB Retardican have been trying hard to destroy this right too.
Constitutional Rights are funny things. It seems some should be defended and others just ignored, right noname?
Anyway, we’ll see how he fares in court for his phone hacking scandal.
Gay Marriage = Freedom of Association.
There, that will get everyone spewing hate.
The fags won. They can have all rights equivalent to marriage. All they have to do is pick a different word from “marriage”. It already has a firm definition and it’s taken. They are stupid for wanting the word too. Change this one simple thing and they have 10s of millions of more supporters.
Well you can east shit and die, Adolf.
We will have all our right and we will redefine marriage as the devil wants us to. The next thing is to remove Christ from Christmas and make it Gaymas.
LaRaza = freedom of association.
White person’s advocacy group = freedom of association?
No, it’s RACISSSSSSSSSS! Destroy their careers! Throw them in jail!!
In the liberal mind, only officially sanctioned associations are permitted. Others are subject to civil or criminal penalties.
My own sense of inadequacy has me thinking that guy in the poster is pointed right at ….. ME!
Oh, the horror.
I didn’t see the whole interview but the clip of Morgan calling that Gun Nut an idiot was while enjoyable still bad journalism/reportage/debate. Just a ratings move which is what most of infotainment is.
Losing more and more friends on other venues by arguing that in fact guns do kill people. amusing how stupid people (males) can get with their toys.
If he wasn’t there wasting everybody’s time and attention span the 1%ers would have to invent him.
This time they off-shored and imported the job of peckerhead. (Why?Because! Once they tire of him, or he starts doing something disagreeable, like having a valid point of view, he can just be sent packing.)
The schmuck is a poster boy for globalisation.
Lemme get this right….
..A gang of NRA loons met in a saloon and agreed to petition the WH because someone exercising their 1st amendment had something to say about the 2nd amendment?
Why does the NRA hate the odd numbered amendments ?
Again, IF Piers Moron was a US citizen, you would have a point. Since he is not a citizen, he is not afforded any Constitutional rights.
I thought you just had to walk across the border to have constitutional rights. Maybe it’s different if you arrive by air.
Don’t think so. The Bill of Rights applies to all US citizens, any residents of the US, and anybody visiting the US.
Why do Teapublicans disrespect the rights of others?
Yeah, Americans are kinda funny about letting furreners come in and tell us how fucked up we are.
Piers Morgan is an arrogant British asshat but I don’t really give a shit what he says. I’ve never liked him and never watched his show.
+1
I hear that! P.M. doesn’t just stand for sleepy time any more. Or maybe it DOES!
Ha, ha. Yes… An Australian hires a Brit to tell the Truth.
Very Unamerican indeed.
That happened a long time ago when Rupert Murdoch hired Brit Hum to lead Fox News to #1 in the ratings.
Personally I don’t care if Piers stays or goes, or which parts of the constitution he hates. I don’t think that is the real point.
As a “journalist” and “interview show host” he should be told that he needs to be bit more civilized and IMHO he should be made to at least apologize to his guest for rude name-calling and unprofessionalism.
He’s a CLOWN! That’s his JOB!
Problem is, way too many people these days take clowns way too seriously. How else can you also explain Obama?!
We don’t want him back thanks.
I completely agree with deporting Piers Morgan as quickly as possible and have thought so for a long, long time because he’s just plain boring, very, very boring. And, as he has demonstrated on numerous occasions he simply does not understand living without the Queen. After several years of living in the U.S.A., he simply doesn’t “get it”; that is he doesn’t get it that all people are equal.
Can’t believe he’s the best CNN could find to follow Larry King.
=1 (Don’t know to go thumbs up or thumbs down here.)
I like the idea of throwing Mr. Morgan out on his butt headed ear but I think we’re better than that.
I also think a LOT of people are missing another HUGE point when it comes to gun restrictions. They seem to forget that once a bullet is in your ass that A BULLET IS IN YOUR ASS! Do you really give a shit (pardon the pun) if if came from a .22 revolver or a CANNON?! Because a BULLET IS IN YOUR ASS!
Limiting or legislating the type of gun is no different that legislating our collective THINKING! Because a semi-automatic military assault weapon is probably LESS dangerous than many semi-automatic hunting rifles. Quite simply, the difference in the two styles of guns is just that – STYLE! So limiting someone’s style goes against another value we ALL seem to cherish – freedom of expression!
And really. When a bullet is in your ass, A BULLET IS IN YOUR ASS! Do you REALLY think you’re going to be all too concerned about what kind of gun it came out of?!
Can I say it again? A BULLET IS IN YOUR ASS! And it makes no difference WHAT put it there. But you damned well better be concerned about WHO PUT IT THERE!
Thats why we don’t let people with bullets in their asses make the laws.
Course, on this issue, as with most of the issue touching on the commonweal==those with a bullet in their ass might indeed make the best laws. In your childlike metaphor, that would be outlawing bullets.
Then macho men can still be stylizing with their arms of choice.
Silly Hooman.
@Jo:
“semi-automatic military assault weapon”
Technically no such thing.
Have you been drinking too much anti/media koolaid?
An “assault” firearm has the ability to switch from semi to full-auto or semi to burst-fire.
So it is either a semi-auto firearm, or it is an assault firearm, but not both.
Assault firearms, which are those that are switchable fire rate, are illegal, prohibited (ie. Canada), or highly regulated (ie. USA) in most places around the world.
I am sure these distinctions will be of comfort to the parents of the dead kids and the family of the killed adults!
Lame, misdirecting, emo argument.
Those distinctions DO matter when the anti-gun’ers go on their witch hunts, and when the governments make their oppressive laws.
No, no, those facts are of no importance. We must ban barrel shrouds even if we don’t know what they are, they just sound dangerous.
barrel shroud?… you mean that shoulder thing that goes up? 😉
Isn’t there some way to deport Hannity?
Shoot him! I DARE YOU!
I actually like Piers, but he’s completely wrong here. The best way to preserve America is gun training so we could safely have more guns. Proficiency with both handguns and rifles should be a requirement for graduation from junior high school. Supervised, measured firing of at least 1000 rounds.
AMERICAN “RIGHTS” AREN’T EVEN THE ISSUE HERE!!!
This has NOTHING to do with our Constitution (other than the attack about it’s contents) since it’s rather like throwing a hooligan out of the soccer stadium for being a loud mouth malcontent and trying to start a public brawl. Something I’m sure this limey has some experience with.
So if Piers Morgan is NOT be a U.S. citizen but still want’s to start some shit then hell yes! Deport the loudmouth asshole. If he thinks he’s got a right to get in on OUR family argument then let him spew his crap somewhere else – assuming they will let him.
Or maybe! we could all just laugh and point at him. After all, he IS a TV clown.
I swear! Some people’s rotten teeth seem to be spreading into their brains.
… And ANOTHER thing!
DO YOU REALLY EXPECT OBAMA TO DO ANYTHING LIKE PROTECT OR DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION?!!!
I’m absolutely sure Obama doesn’t like the second amendment and probably not many of the other ones either. But he did take an oath to protect and defend The Constitution of the United States of America.
But just like Bill Clinton, those are just words. And just like G.W. Bush, it’s nothing but a goddamn piece of paper. So for anyone to actually think that the President of the United States will do anything like PROTECT or even DEFEND it clearly has their heads up their own asses.
And I’m sure some other idiot will say something like “that’s the NRA for you” or something. After all, these “wing nuts” and “gun dummies” MUST be CRAZY for expects a sitting President to actually DO HIS JOB!
If only the British had thought of disarming America 250 years ago.
Someone needs to play Captain Obvious here and point out a misconception many seem to have about this story — this is _not_ something being pushed by the Obama administration, this is a petition someone started on the whitehouse.gov petition web site.
I thought that was obvious already. I don’t see that anyone came to your conclusion.
He’s slow but we don’t judge here. Look surprised .
Lane Price failed at committing suicide in his Jaguar and ended up hanging himself. Piers will fail with a gun.
Meanwhile David Gregory violated DC gun laws by showing an ammunition magazine on TV. It is illegal in DC to possess magazines, even if not attached to a firearm. When will David Gregory be charged?
Okay, way more than enough people signed the petition to require the BO to step up to the plate and say no in order to protect his worshiper.
Tho he is but one of my flock I must say I hate him.
Dear Yankees, your stupidity, arrogance and hypocrisy are as strong as ever. Spare your hysterical whining: self-deportation is in my plans, though I don’t need your blessing, permission or approval to stay here and annoy some of your types indefinitely.
if you think the 2nd amendment trumps the 1st amendment, but you run your mouth about “the constitution” and “liberty” 24/7, you’re probably an ideologue rather than a lover of liberty and freedom.
Interesting how that lime sucking bastard has fully put his phone hacking ways fully behind him with this latest stream of drivel about his adopted country. I demand he give up his tax avoiding ways.