Uh wah says:

What the hell is a “smart” bullet?

I can’t wait to hear this one…….

Just to help you out: Without knowing anything about this system, it seems obvious that the way it works is by setting a way point that the optic (scope) will continuously track and maintain as its zero (bullet’s impact point). While you sway and move your reticle around, it will automatically adjust the zero to hit where you set the marker at. There’s no “smart” bullet that can fly in loops and write your name in the air before it impacts.

WmDE says:

I don’t think it affects skill so much as removes doubt. You have to line up the shot and mark the target.

Pull the secondary trigger.

Then line up shot a second time to fire weapon.

An interesting possibility is team sniping. Two or more weapons fire if all secondary triggers are pulled and all weapons are on target. Good for hostage situations.

No so super says:

You mean the same rebel armies that still use dug up Kalashnikovs that were left behind? The same ones that manufacture bombs out of household items because they can’t afford anything else? The same rebel armies that use machetes to chop off heads and hands of village members? The same rebel armies that call a pick-up truck a, “personnel transport vehicle?”

You’re talking about the same rebel armies that have known for years that our troops glow in the dark because of the amount of IR identification they use, but can only afford one worn out Gen 1 night vision per 1,000 fighters? Maybe you mean the rebel armies that resort to slave labor to mine for diamonds because they can’t afford excavating machinery?

I’d say you’re ‘super’ alright. Super retarded. Not a rebel army from Africa to Afghanistan that could afford or have access to this type of equipment.

spsffan says:

Now, does anyone wonder why defenders of the 2nd Amendment are stereotyped by the media as nuts? You rant and rave like Donald Trump and then expect anyone with an IQ over 15 to pay attention ? Huh?

For the record, the device in the video looks quite useful and darn right neto. But I’m sticking with my M1 and S&W686. Neither of these need batteries.

me says:

I love how “liberal” is somehow anti gun. I am a “liberal” (you would probably consider me a communist I am sure but I am not) because I believe in freedom… and separation between church and state. And I collect and build military rifles. Last I checked it wasn’t Obama who took our guns, it was Bush.

So back off nut job and make a new tin foil helmet for your back woods buddies.

msbpodcast says:

Huh, idiot the gun trade has been the only sector of the economy that has been flourishing during this depression.

Why? Because…

Obama knows that gasoline is over priced and not under our control, cars that use it last and last, and take up a lot of space to just sit there, but you can just buy another useless weapon and rack it up in a gun locker in the closet and that is even better for our economy than another iPad or iPhone in a desk drawer somewhere.

Car companies are dying but you can always fit another Remington™ in the closet. It’ll give you something to play with while you sit there on your front porch.

Banks have been bailed out with your tax dollars so they’re not really hurting, but they’re not growing either.

It doesn’t matter what sector of the economy gets off its knees as long as one of them does.

Look at the gun producing companies. Now look at the cities where they’re produced. Look at their economies. Do you see self-sustaining growth in all of the associated and ancillary /supporting sectors?

See what I mean?

Obama isn’t against guns, he’s all for you going ont and spending a few hundred bucks on something locally or at least American made.

So what says:

A problem not addressed by the video is a non-stationary target. It’s rare enough to get that perfect still target shot in a hunting situation. What is really the likely hood of a still target in a combat environment. It won’t do any good if all you do is spend your time on target “tagging” the target.