Finally, someone tells us the real reason why voting machines are not audited. It’s about time someone testified about this. That said, this guy has a few dubious answers.




  1. MikeN says:

    >We need machines

    There you go again. Somehow they managed to have elections for hundreds if not thousands of years without them.

    Liberals keep trying to push new fangled systems, including vote-by-mail and vote-by-internet.

  2. MikeN says:

    So does this post mean that liberals are already planning for an Obama loss, and they need an excuse as to why?

  3. deowll says:

    Dallas, If the Dems didn’t rig every election in Chicago even when they were going to win the cemeteries would have to stop voting and that would be against a tradition going back over 100 years besides voter fraud is the entire reason for electronic voting: To make it easier to control the outcome of elections.

  4. ericville says:

    When was this video recorded?

  5. tcc3 says:

    #31 MikeN

    /
    //
    ///
    ////

    300 million people are going to vote like this?

    Shit, I lost my place.

  6. tcc3 says:

    #31 MikeN

    Every system is a machine, whether you realize it or not. And you pretend like no one ever cheated before “machines”

  7. Grandpa says:

    #8 You couldn’t be more right. I found out my veteran Brother-in-law is a Tea Party loyalist, and my Mother-in-Law Retired on SS and Medicare is also a Tea Party favorite.

    WTF !

  8. foobar says:

    This doesn’t happen in America. Maybe Ohio, but not America.

  9. Ryan Searise says:

    Ah heck let’s just do it like they do at American Idol. Just let everyone vote as many times as they want until the 12 PM deadline… come on what’s wrong with that ????
    Go Fox !!!!!

  10. Mr. Fusion says:

    Sorry, but I just don’t believe a guy that laughs at his own testimony.

    Yes, voting machines could be hacked. Yes, there should be a paper trail. Yet none of that compares with the Republican led voter fraud of dis-entitling voters.

  11. MikeN says:

    #35 it’s more like 120 million, and for many precincts thats less than 1000 votes, so yes.
    You could also have a machine count paper ballots.
    You know, basic stuff before liberals decided we needed electronic voting, to predictable results. Predictable for all but liberals so upset over Florida.

  12. tcc3 says:

    #41 MikeN

    But that would be an evil liberal *machine*! As I recall that paper ballot counting has its flaws too.

  13. MikeN says:

    Well, yes of course it has flaws. The liberal flaw is thinking that the new idea will solve things. The end result was predictable, and predicted.

  14. tcc3 says:

    And the conservative flaw is that “the old ways” are *always* better.

    If a solution fails, think of a better one. “This solution wasn’t perfect so we were wrong to even try” is fatalistic and stupid on its face.

  15. Mr. Fusion says:

    #41, Lyin’ Mike,

    Electronic voting machines were a Republican idea, pushed by the Bush machine in the wake of 9/11 hysteria.

  16. MikeN says:

    hahahaha, you’re a hoot. I suppose interet votig is a Republican idea too?

  17. tcc3 says:

    #45 Mr. Fusion

    Now that Bush’s failed policies have been exposed and is widely viewed disfavorably, they’ve decided he was a progressive all along. Even though they cheered him on when he was in office.

    Gotta keep up with the self delusion of the month.

  18. Glenn E. says:

    Rigged voting machines simply covers up for the fact that whoever does get elected, they do whatever the most moneyed interests, tell them to do. Party affiliation doesn’t matter.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 4550 access attempts in the last 7 days.