On Thursday, Business Insider reported that China is trying to buy “a huge chunk” of Facebook.

According to the business news website, Beijing approached a fund that buys stock from former Facebook employees to see if it could assemble a stake large enough “to matter.” Moreover, Citibank is rumored to be trying to acquire as much as $1.2 billion of stock for two sovereign wealth funds, one from the Middle East and the other Chinese. Business Insider reports a third source, from a “very influential” Silicon Valley investment bank, confirms that Citi is representing China.

Should Beijing be allowed to buy a part of Mark Zuckerberg’s site? Business Insider tells us there is “little need” for concern about Chinese censors looking at the photos and postings of the 700 million people who trust Facebook with their personal online activity.

First, China’s position won’t be large. A billion-dollar investment does not buy much influence in a site expected to be worth a hundred times that when it goes public. Second, Beijing will be acquiring nonvoting stock. Third, shareholders don’t get the right to look at what’s on the site. All of these arguments from Business Insider ring true.

Yet they are all beside the point—and there are other reasons to be concerned. The business site says that “sovereign wealth funds are pretty distinct from their governments.”

Perhaps Norway’s fund is, but not China’s. The Communist Party, despite three decades of economic reform, insists on its monopoly of political power. And to maintain that monopoly, it tightly controls its own instrumentalities. That’s especially true at this moment because the Party is in the midst of the most comprehensive crackdown on society since the 1989 Beijing Spring. Chinese leaders clearly view social media as a threat to their rule, especially after seeing its force-multiplying effect in the ongoing Arab Spring protests that have toppled governments. In short, China’s sovereign wealth fund, which is no more independent of the Communist Party than the Beijing municipal government, wants to buy a stake in the world’s most prominent social networking site because Chinese leaders want to control social media. And they hope to do that as part of their comprehensive campaign to dominate the conversation about China—not just inside the country but around the world as well.

All your Face are berong to us ……




  1. unplugged says:

    meh…… you can always use google+

  2. UncDon says:

    That picture is hilarious.

  3. bobbo, words have meaning says:

    Who do the Chinese think they are?—Fox News?

  4. Dallas says:

    LOL. “All your faces berong to us”. Ha

  5. chuck says:

    Does China really need to buy Facebook to get access to user data?

    They could simply ask Zuckerberg for all the data (in exchange for allowing Facebook in China).

    Or why don’t they just hack in like everyone else?

  6. ubiquitous talking head says:

    zarachy disease

  7. sargasso_c says:

    Strange parallels, China and Facebook. Both led by strong but secretive dictators. Both rely on the unquestioned conformity and obedience of their citizens. Both sell false comradery. Both spy on their people. Both commoditize their populations. Yes, it might work.

  8. iwishiwasaballer says:

    no one else is calling it

    Publicity stunt for Google +

    Anti China sentiment is huge and associating with Fakebook is genius

    Marketing 101

  9. msbpodcast says:

    Why shouldn’t they?

    They practically own Wall*Mart (if China gets a wage-slave payroll sniffle, Wall*Mart gets pneumonia,) they own a lot of real estate, (on both coasts of the continental United States, Africa, Europe [while we were bankrupting ourselves with insurance policies backed with shady real-estate pricing deals the Chinese were getting really rich.])

    I for one bow to our Chinese overlords.

    The weight of their boots on my neck makes it impossible to stand up.

  10. Jim says:

    Step 1. let china buy billions of dollars in facebook stock

    Step 2. close it down and bankrupt it

    Step 3. ???

    Step 4. profit

  11. Cap'nKangaroo says:

    But I thought the CIA had a significant position in Facebook?

  12. W.T.Effyall says:

    They’ve always been obsessed with “face.”

  13. Animby says:

    # 7 sargasso_c said, “China and Facebook. Both led by strong but secretive dictators.”

    Yeah, yeah, yeah. But do the leaders of China kill then slaughter their own dinner? Do they rip into the bleeding carcass with sharpened teeth?

    Of course, they do!

    And that’s why this whole thing is great news for Google. “We put China in their place. Now come join Google + …”

  14. sargasso_c says:

    #13. Animby. I entirely agree.

  15. Mr. Fusion says:

    Facebook. The new old MySpace.

    Does anyone still use MySpace? NewsCorp bought it for almost $700 million and it tanked. They recently sold it for something like $25 million.

    Will anyone still be using Facebook in two or three years?

  16. Animby says:

    F/U to my own comment in #13:
    I just read that Microsoftie has just signed a big deal granting their Bing search engine technology to Baidu – the censored Chinese search portal.

    Publicity-wise. things just get better and better for Google.

  17. deowll says:

    They want to set up their own version of FaceBook?

    Not sure it would truly work in China because most people would be aware they need to edit everything they say which to some degree is true here as Wiener proved.

  18. Brian says:

    since they already control all state media, it’s clear that what they want is the power to control perception of their nation in the the media (and in potential territories). that’s the first step in an invasion – control the media. in an impromptu invasion, the invading force is directed to destroy radio and television stations first. but in a planned infiltration, you get the media on your side by giving them the choice between favoring you or destruction. the latter is far worse, because some percentage of the population will believe the propaganda and fall in with the invading force.

  19. Glenn E. says:

    They always assure everyone that having billions of dollars of stock in some company, won’t allow some entity to exert some control over what it does or how it operates. And then it does, without them telling you. You can bet the Chinese wouldn’t be doing this, if they didn’t know for sure they would be getting results of some kind. Facebook just isn’t coming clean on the details.

  20. palmdoc says:

    Why would they buy something they are blocking in China?


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 4019 access attempts in the last 7 days.