In a forest of tubes eight metres high in eastern Spain scientists hope they have found the fuel of tomorrow: bio-oil produced with algae mixed with carbon dioxide from a factory.

Almost 400 of the green tubes, filled with millions of microscopic algae, cover a plain near the city of Alicante, next to a cement works from which the C02 is captured and transported via a pipeline to the “blue petroleum” factory.

“We are trying to simulate the conditions which existed millions of years ago, when the phytoplankton was transformed into oil,” said engineer Eloy Chapuli. “In this way, we obtain oil that is the same as oil today.”

Every day some of this highly concentrated liquid is extracted and filtered to produce a biomass that is turned into bio-oil. The other great advantage of the system is that it is a depollutant — it absorbs the C02 which would otherwise be released into the atmosphere.

“In a unit that covers 50 square kilometres, which is not something enormous, in barren regions of southern Spain, we could produce about 1.25 million barrels per day,” or almost as much as the daily export of oil from Iraq.

US oil giant ExxonMobil plans to invest up to $600 million in research on oil produced from algae. I’ll wait until it’s at the pump for $1 a gallon.




  1. sargasso_c says:

    And how, may I ask does algae get turned into refinaeble oil?

  2. pilgrim says:

    Actually, the Spanish did not “discover” this.
    MIT did.

    “Microalgae: a green source of renewable H2 – research paper from MIT”
    http://oilgae.com/blog/2007/02/microalgae-green-source-of-renewable-h2.html

    MIT Algae Photobioreactor

  3. Stoned Ape Theory says:

    Me in my M5…..

    FUCK YOU, I’M SAVING THE PLANET.

  4. bobbo, had enough dogma today? says:

    I thought the fuel of the future was burning religious fundies?

    Fuel from phytoplankton is a process having almost nothing to do with geologic production. I hate pop science almost as much as I hate religious fundies. You know hate: its how love expresses itself on a grander scale.

  5. Buzz Mega says:

    Sinclair Oil: Your dinosaur logo should be a single cell.

  6. Shubee says:

    CO2 is not a pollutant.

  7. MikeN says:

    If they make this cheap, then environmentalists will oppose it, as their primary concern is not CO2, but serving the religion of less consumption.

  8. Harry says:

    http://sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/03/110323135635.htm

    This is a good article on the subject.

  9. 1873 Colt says:

    I’ll be dead when it gets perfected, so I don’t give a shit.

  10. msbpodcast says:

    Yes… Lets take a step backwards to a smog and soot filled world were the rivers are aflame with our pollution and there are no fish left to eat, where the soil is dead from our waste, where the amount of money you have is no guarantee that the medicines will help you at all.

    That’s the future we can expect if we take this oil slick path into tomorrow.

    This specie doesn’t deserve to survive…

  11. msbpodcast says:

    Amusingly enough, this Dantesque vision of the future, worthy of Goya’s Saturn Devouring His Sons, come to you from a descendent from Alicante, Spain, where my paternal grand-father hailed from.

    When the Spaniards were shooting each other, my grampa decided that he was not going to join entier side and he headed for Montréal. He dodged the draft, and the bullet.

  12. spsffan says:

    #14 Oddly enough, back when we had smoggy skies and rivers aflame, we had plenty of fish. Not so much these days.

    As for the algae based oil, it’s like fusion. An idea that’s been around for a long time, but commercial viability is always just “a few years away”. I’ll believe it when I can buy it at the local Chevron station.

    Oh, and it’s not a “depollutant” as far as CO2 goes. The CO2 will get released when you burn the oil. It IS “carbon neutral” in that it’s the same CO2 formerly emitted by the cement plant, rather than newly unearthed CO2 from an oil well.

    I wish them good luck~!

  13. Benjamin says:

    #16 If may not be a “depollutant”, but the cement plant will still get a tax deduction.

    The advantage of getting oil from algae is that them Muslims rulers can go back to living in tents like the people they rule over instead of living like princes in vast palaces funded by the world’s oil consumption. Also less money for the terrorists.

  14. bobbo, had enough dogma today? says:

    #15–PeePod==Saturn Eating His Son has NOTHING to do with any vision of the future. Its all about the corruption/evil of tyrants in power. So much so that a father/king will eat his own young to prevent losing his throne.

    I stood for a good while (30 minutes==very long for me) in awe in front of this picture thinking it really captured the horror of the Greek Myth. ((DAMN!!–the Greek Mythos is complex/revealing/complete.)) Then 20 minutes later I was blown away by the even superior but lesser known rendition by Rubens.

    Things mean what they mean. No Mr Potato face switching parts willy-nilly in your ignorance.

  15. Dallas says:

    Excellent!! Fossil fuels, Oil and Coal are fuels of the past. The future is renewable clean sources if energy.

    The fact that a filthy oil company investing in it suggest merit in the process. My fear is these tools will smother it because it may be too easy to replicate.

  16. Nobody says:

    #3 – all fuels are a net energy loss! The trick is making the energy loss come from sunlight rather than the same fuel you are trying to produce

  17. KD Martin says:

    Nobody, all energy we use comes from the sun, with the exception of nuclear fission and (maybe we’ll learn how to make it work) fusion.

  18. deowll says:

    #19 You don’t get the idea that people work hard to make money do you? You call people greedy capitalist motivated solely by money then claim they would throw away a money maker and you think other people are irrational because they say you are irrational.

    Oil deposits are still forming naturally, millions of years ago the amount of CO2 in the air wasn’t much different that it is today.

    Many companies are trying to make this work. One small problem. This stuff costs about as much as cooking oil if not more. Um, it pretty much has to be more or they would try to sell it for cooking oil.

    Unless costs can be brought down massively people would/will be living in crowded housing with almost no options for travel beyond their neighborhoods and spending almost all of their income on food and utilities.

    I know what it’s like to live like that. If you don’t know you don’t want to learn by doing. My memories aren’t painful because I was a small child at the time and my parents were dealing with life’s problems. I had no clue what life was like for those who could afford a higher standard of living.

  19. BigBoyBC says:

    You will never see $1 a gallon at the pumps, both the fed and the State will add all sorts of taxes, fees and other charges to it.

  20. soundwash says:

    File this article under Scams-R-Us. What a crapload of psuedo “green” BS science.

    -sure BP is investing 600mill, because of all the subsidies and breaks they’ll get and *need* to make believe this BS is “green” (RTFA) still keeps you strapped to the oil cabal boys..
    -what’s the point?

    The “fuel” of the future is NO fuel at all.. ..it’s Resonant (fuel-less) energy.

    someone, anyone, -get a clue..

    -s

    (and fwiw: somebody *please* bitch slap the “CO2 is a toxic pollutant boys” to friggen Pluto)

  21. Rob Leather says:

    Whoa, here. I thought it took MILLION if not BILLIONS of years for “basic organisms” to turn into oil. Huge time, pressure and heat.

    So now you’re telling me that the Spanish are doing it in days…. in tubes….

    Do you think that means the theory of how oil is created might need a few minor amendments… like how long it actually takes.

  22. Dallas says:

    #22 I don’t understand what your point is nor how any of what you wrote relates to my #19 comment.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 5471 access attempts in the last 7 days.