Separated at birth

Can someone explain what this is all about? How is this a good thing for the public at large?

Preventing preterm births just got 150 times more expensive, now that KV Pharmaceuticals has gained exclusive rights to produce a progesterone shot used to prevent premature births in high-risk mothers.

Although the shot has been available in unregulated form from specialty compounding pharmacies for years for $10 a pop, the Food and Drug Administration recently granted KV Pharmaceuticals sole rights to produce the drug, which will be marketed as Makena and cost $1,500 per dose — an estimated $30,000 in total per pregnancy.

Related link on FDA corruption.

Found by Al Cole.




  1. Nobody says:

    @spsffan – and by making this drug more expensive you are also preferentially reducing the population of poor people so overall this is good for the economy.

  2. McCullough says:

    #2. If we ever do get a government run health care system, then it will have nothing to do with the poor’s ability to pay. We will all pay dearly.

  3. Olo Baggins of Bywater says:

    Any pretense that the FDA was regulating based on science and safety, rather than corporate profits, was thrown out the window by Bush’s FDA director appointments.

    The FDA is one of the GOP’s elimination targets. It’s an easy argument to say they’re worthless when they’ve been run this way for a decade.

  4. Guyver says:

    Watch “Food Inc.”

  5. dusanmal says:

    Ok, all bashing no facts. Not (not surprisingly) in the snippet of the article.
    Facts that change the story:
    1)Makena is given to women at risk of delivering prematurely. It went off the market in the early 1990s because of side effect concerns and worries about overall efficacy…

    Now, if there was a story about FDA not studying drug enough and prematurely allowing it without proper studies… NoAgenda crowd would yell CRIME and endangerment of those poor mothers and babies. FDA knew of potential side effect problems.

    2)There is an official FDA program offering market exclusivity to companies that are willing to take up such non-approved therapies and give them the full clinical and regulatory treatment.

    In order to really find if drug is safe and usable and PROTECT customers, FDA grants exclusivity in exchange for serious side effects and efficiency tests. Company gets rights but with RISK included. If extensive tests find (as suspected in 1990s) that the drug is dangerous – they just wasted a lot of money on research. Hence the exclusivity and price. Someone must pay for studies and take that risk for some benefit. Total benefit is still at consumer side. Drug will be properly tested and vetted. Consumer will be protected. At the cost. There must be cost. This is not a free World for all.

  6. deowll says:

    So Obama is going to help, Poor/Hispanic/White/Black Americans who tend to be more likely to need these shots have a lower birth rate?

    Anybody who doesn’t think this admin is one of the most corrupt in the history of the nation is suffering from dementia.

    Also if any brain dead partisan wants to point out that many in GOP are also corrupt feel free. It doesn’t make these people any less corrupt or you any less foolish for supporting them.

  7. John E. Quantum says:

    I expect to hear a lot more screaming about how evil the FDA is now that they have taken on Big Tobacco. Few if any government decisions are made without input from corporate interests- that’s just how it is. However, corporate interests don’t always take precedence over public health. When Commissioner Hamburg decided to start regulating the tobacco industry, the wolves began to form a pack and now they are looking for blood.

  8. MikeN says:

    Reformers need a crisis to achieve their reforms. More premature births = more infant deaths, giving a crisis.

    FDA is now also considering cost instead of safety when they make their recommendations.

  9. So what says:

    #7 Damn you, you interject logic and facts into a wildly speculative bashing of the FDA. You are obviously a shill for the drug companies double damn you.

  10. RSweeney says:

    One of the many problems with having a government capable of making cheap things expensive and expensive things cheap.

  11. Buzz Mega says:

    I like questions in the headline’s format.

    “Are you stupid or just ignorant?”

    “Do you use shit for toothpaste or has your tongue just died?”

    “Is this a corrupt, irrelevant blog or is it just for laughs?”

  12. raintrees says:

    Yawn. “I’m shocked that there’s gambling going on…”

    It has been at least a decade now that I use the FDA and USDA stamps as certification that said stamped product is not to be trusted.

    I agree that the FDA, as it stands now, should be dismantled. The illusion of safety is worse than no safety.

  13. AC__in_mich says:

    Hey! What happened to the link I provided to the original article? I think it was comment 5 – grrrrrr

  14. EnemyOfTheState says:

    I daily consume 12 products approved and regulated by this outfit. It has become a game of mix-and-match to see if I will puke or lose consciousness.

    The high cost and low availability of certain medications along with the best lobby efforts determine my available course of treatments. Of that I am sure.

  15. Mike Mar says:

    KV took a $10/dose drug that has been in production for 50 years and already studied by NIHto $1500/dose. ($30k for the 20 treatments). Many will die because of this. Not even the company will benefit if they don’t change the price structure..as the increasing deaths are laid at their feet, they will be sued out of business. Hopefully the daily increasing backlash will make them reconsider the pricing. There is still time but it’s running out.

  16. mike at home says:

    The wicked witch (green) was actually a very hard-working actress who risked her life repeatedly making the Wizard Of Oz, and like a true trouper carried on gallantly after she was badly burned while doing a dangerous fire scene.
    The other one not so much.

  17. bobbo, some little ideas stay with us forever says:

    #7–dusanmal==yes, thanks for the “other side.” I wonder if there is any “more” to it as well like a requirement to provide the drug for $10 for those who can’t pay? That is pure speculation on my part, just looking/imagining the equity of the position.

    So, where is the report on their on going long term effectiveness study?

  18. MikeN says:

    John Edwards is salivating…

  19. bobbo, some little ideas stay with us forever says:

    Mike–good reference. I can’t “imagine” being him. Never really “that” close because the poor don’t vote but such a good message. Too bad, like any good trial attorney, he is a total fraud.

    I really would like to know, why I don’t know exactly, what he really thinks about his life and the decisions he made.

    He’s not stupid, he just acts that way.

    Very human, almost a:

    Stoopid Hooman.

  20. 1873 Colt says:

    None of this will cost anybody anything.

    …..Obamacare!……..

  21. 1873 Colt says:

    #13 Name something that the Federal Government makes cheaper than it could be through private business.. if the government kept their slimy hands out of it.

    Gasoline?
    Airfare?
    Automobiles?
    My doctor?
    My shoes?
    What, exactly?

  22. msbpodcast says:

    If you’ll just get over the myth that the FDA is acting for the consumers, you’ll suddenly realize that everything is laden with salt and sugar (in an attempt to give it some taste,) because the FDA is there for the food processors, not the food consumers.

    You can eat shit as far as the FDA is concerned. In fact, they have such a strangle-hold on the food processing industry that you probably areeating shit.

    It tastes like crap, for years and years in the wrapper.

    The consumers who get bit by the first part of the sting also get fed the second part of the sting, about the drugs you have to take to get over the fact that you’re eating over preserved crap, and, most of which you wouldn’t need if you didn’t eat the crap in the first place.

    The FDA is pure evil.

  23. Tenaya says:

    1. Find a cheap product already on the market.
    2. Eliminate the competition by convincing a government regulator to assign you a monopoly.
    3. Raise the price by a bazillion percent.
    4. Profit ! ! !

  24. Dallas says:

    #28 Agreed. This is exactly what the Puke’s ordered but somehow seems distasteful when served.

  25. Gilbert's Agent says:

    #29, Dallas,

    You mean the “Regressives”?

  26. Skeptic says:

    Here’s a better link to the story
    http://msnbc.msn.com/id/41994697/ns/health-pregnancy/

  27. two to the head says:

    Ca-ching! Us Government revises human resource value upward to $9,530,000.

    I’m starting to see how they come up with these numbers.

  28. DB says:

    The U.S. Govt needs to collapse the same way the Russian government did — End both communism and fascism


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 4199 access attempts in the last 7 days.