Thanks XKCD.




  1. bobbo, keeping his priorities in order says:

    Not for more than 5 minutes. Much better to suffer the idiocy of a stranger on the internet than the cold sholder of the stranger in bed. Heh, heh.

    Similar–leaving email messages to the wifey while both of us are “at home.” Its the beauty of a written record, soon to be followed by my belt mounted personal web cam. “I know I told you the car was low on gas. Let’s go to the video tape!” But as Dr Phil has so infuriatingly informed me: “Do you want to be happy, or right?”

    Damn you Dr Phil!!!!!!

  2. Sparky_One says:

    Just who in the hell do you think you are calling me wrong?

  3. rabidmonkey says:

    “Has this ever happened to you?”

    From whose point of view: 1) the wife, 2) the poster who is correcting someone, or 3) the person on the internet being corrected?

  4. Grass4 says:

    That guy is NEVER going to get any sleep.

  5. FRAGaLOT says:

    I’ve done that when there was something wrong WITH the internet, like my ISP acting up and i have to stay on the phone waiting for customer service to pick up so i can tell them, hey there’s something wrong with my internet. Adam can sympathize.

  6. skeptic says:

    I’m glad this isn’t about me.

  7. Butter Butt says:

    Nope, don’t worry about it now that we have No Agenda watching our backs!

  8. Furious77 says:

    Still not giving credit to xkcd for the theft of their IP. This is where YOU are wrong on the internet.

    [I fixed it. – ed.]

  9. Animby says:

    YES!!!
    Damn ECA, Pedro and Alfie.

  10. personne says:

    http://xkcd.com/386/

    http://xkcd.com/license.html ­— fair and not so complicated, is it?

    This blog’s tacky.

  11. Bryan Price says:

    Why am I up right now???

  12. No fly zone says:

    Turn off the darn computer and go to bed!!!

  13. Thomas says:

    You mean finding something ancient on Internet and feeling the need to repost it? Sure.

  14. derp says:

    Great comment Personne. In your need to correct someone with a comment not only did you prove your case but you displayed the action we are mocking and further removed the actual deficiency of the post with your links. So the post is bad but once you point out the post is bad with the supplied links the post is good, 2points for proving and negating your argument with said proof.

  15. interglacial says:

    #16 derp,
    The last time Marc posted an uncredited picture from xkcd (a week or two ago) he got alot of critical responses. Makes me think he could be goading people into complaining. Oops, have I fallen into the trap as-well? or maybe I’m reading to much into this. Either way Personne is right – neglecting attribution is cheap and breaking xkcd’s copyright.

  16. deowll says:

    So when did the thanks XKCD link appear with the graphic?

    Correcting people who aren’t smart enough to agree with me before I express my views is a weakness of mine.

    I must admit however that there are occasions when it just isn’t worth the effort and I leave them to live in darkness.

    Tell you what I’m feeling good so feel free to be as wrong as you wish about this topic. ?^)

  17. BadCam says:

    Wow Marc.I’m guessing JCD will have to give you a medal soon. You’re only a couple of posts away from reaching the end of the internet.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 5809 access attempts in the last 7 days.