The complete story is here.

Found by BubbaRay.




  1. Greg Allen says:

    I’ve wondered why this kind of thing doesn’t happen more often in demolitions.

    I was scared for the girls (I think they where girls) because of the power wires.

  2. Smee says:

    It fell down, isn’t that what was supposed to happen? 🙂

  3. Mr Fog says:

    “…an undetected crack on the south side of the tower pulled it in a different direction.”

    Excuse me? How did you find that crack afterward?

  4. chuck says:

    You can clearly see when the remotely-piloted 2nd plane crashes into it, just at the same time it is hit by the particle beam weapon.

    Clearly it was an inside job.

  5. nicktherat says:

    LOL @ this video and LOL @#3

  6. The Aberrant says:

    #3 – Definitely smells of a little b.s. to me. I think by “undetected” they mean “knew about but didn’t think it’d matter”. I suppose the ensuing lawsuit will tell.

  7. Faxon says:

    Yes. Obviously Bush and Cheney planted other explosives at the bottom of the stack, knowing that there would one day be a detonation attempt and the planted explosives would carry out their nefarious deed.

  8. Joe says:

    America’s industry prowess on display.

  9. Troublemaker says:

    They should have got the guys that took the WTC down. Those guys were top notch.

  10. EdHayes3 says:

    Well said #9!

  11. OneWhoKnows says:

    They should have just set it on fire. That worked good for WTC7.

  12. skeptic says:

    There was no crack. This was intentionally allowed to happen by elements inside the United States government.

  13. Troublemaker says:

    Lowest bidder…

  14. Troublemaker says:

    The crack story is complete BS. Sifting through the rubble, how could they determine whether the crack was there before or was caused after the collapse. I’m sure there were a LOT of cracks after it crumbled to pieces.

    Again, never hire the lowest bidder…

  15. deowll says:

    A new break would show an unweathered surface while an old crack would show some sort of discoloration.

    With the right kind of charge in the right location that old crack should not have been an issue which is why you hire an expert…They didn’t not remove enough material at the correct location.

  16. Hight Karate says:

    Here’s a concept: tension wires.

  17. Yankinwaoz says:

    It is obvious what happened. Some of the charges failed on one side. The other side was weakened and it fell that way, just like how a tree is fell by cutting a notch on the side you want it to fall toward.

  18. Gildersleeve says:

    It was probably due to that lousy good craftsmanship of a pre 1970’s tower build. Why couldn’t they build things the way they do today?

  19. wirelessg says:

    Lowest bidder? Wil E. Coyote Acme Demolition

    beep beep

  20. Nugget Coombs says:

    They should have got Jeb Bush to set the Bang-Bangs.

  21. Fred Ziffel says:

    Could have been worse had it fell toward that last camera angle.

    But when does this make me think of QE?

  22. Sea Lawyer says:

    This reminds me of how engineers are legally liable for flaws in what they design and build, and why it’s such a joke when software developers call themselves “engineers.”

  23. msbpodcast says:

    #22, I totally agree with you. Software “engineer” is an oxymoron, like military intelligence or catholic university.

    Now some insurance agent is going to carry a cheque for repairs to a power plans and all those electrical cables; along with a bill for the increase to their insurance rates. (The insurance business is a business dedicated to trying to prevent idiocy like that blasting/demolition crew caused.)

  24. Rich says:

    This happened in my hometown, a few miles away. Trust ne when I say it represents the spirit and future of this place, and I’m currently searching for a new place to live.

  25. Rich says:

    It was so cool and retro looking, with its name in old-fashioned type on front and that cool retro-looking smokestack. They should have left it.

  26. noname says:

    I agree with Yankinwaoz # 17

    It seems the last explosion blew out the base of the chimney as it sat down shorter by a few feet before leaning. As the chimney sat on the irregular base cut, it fell like a tree, first leaning then falling in the direction of the notch/wedge cut!

    I guess the demolition “experts” where excepting the chimney to crumble of it’s own weight; instead of holding together. A very well built chimney!

    Hight Karate #16 is also right, they should have applied tension ropes at the top to fell the chimney in the desired direction!


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 10554 access attempts in the last 7 days.