Pretty screwy. Unless the clip is a hoax. Here is some background on the possibilities.
Thanks to Zamir Humud.
Support the Blog — Buy This Book!
For Kindle and with free ePub version. Only $9.49 Great reading.
Here is what Gary Shapiro CEO of the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) said: Dvorak's writing sings with insight and clarity. Whether or not you agree with John's views, he will get you thinking and is never boring. These essays are worth the read!
Put this ad on your blog!
Syndicate
Subscribe to Main Blog feed here:
Subscribe to Comments too (below):
Junk Email Filter
That person is in, like, so much trouble for breaking temporal prime directive. Piccard is going to kick their ass into the 24th century
Old lady taking to herself. Never seen that before.
The other videos are more interesting/relevant.
I wonder if there is any research into momentary time warps ? I’m fairly certain that they occur throughout our lives, most being dismissed as an odd, split-second shift of the mind, or Déjà vu.
I’ll bet the military has a project akin to lucid dreaming.
It’s amusing in such movies as Matrix, however those are more than nanosecond time shifts and *unreal* in the physical world of today. However for those that notice, a nanosecond time-shift in everyday life is not *unreal*, just a bit odd, hahahahaha.
I agree it is not a cell phone or some like modern contraption.
He’s obviously had too much of the drink and not enough of technology.
Cursor_
Forget the old lady with her snuff box—the guy in front of her is reaching for his pulse laser gun.
Its right there!!!!!
Did he call her a “really butch” woman? LOL, that was not a nice thing for a “scientist” to say. She is actually a really attractive time traveling alien shape shifter from the future using the Queen of England as a model. Its so obvious! As proof check out how she changes the zebra into an elephant at the end. Can your i-phone do that? Didn’t think so.
You also have to remember this was a silent film. It was not uncommon to have a band playing during takes or the director talking/yelling to the actors during takes. The old lady was possibly responding to someone off camera… it kind of follows if she was hard of hearing.
Move along. Nothing to see here.
Chuck Roast–ha, ha. Cracks me up. Almost as good as the stripper on “Son of the Beach”. Her name was Porcelain Bidet. Don’t know why I like that name so much, but I do. George Castansas liked “Buck Naked”,–not bad.
Well obviously there were no cell towers in 1928 so the only logical conclusion is that the clip shows a time traveler from further in the future where cell towers aren’t needed!
I mean what other conclusion can you draw from such overwhelming…ummm…evidence?
It’s astounding, time is fleeting
Madness takes its toll
But listen closely, not for very much longer
I’ve got to keep control
I remember doing the Time Warp
Drinking those moments when
The blackness would hit me and the void would be calling
Let’s do the time warp again…
Let’s do the time warp again!
It’s just a jump to the left
And then a step to the right
With your hands on your hips
You bring your knees in tight
But it’s the pelvic thrust that really drives you insane,
Let’s do the Time Warp again!
It’s so dreamy, oh fantasy free me
So you can’t see me, no not at all
In another dimension, with voyeuristic intention
Well-secluded, I see all
With a bit of a mind flip
You’re there in the time slip
And nothing can ever be the same
You’re spaced out on sensation, like you’re under sedation
Let’s do the Time Warp again!
Well I was walking down the street just a-having a think
When a snake of a guy gave me an evil wink
He shook me up, he took me by surprise
He had a pickup truck and the devil’s eyes.
He stared at me and I felt a change
Time meant nothing, never would again
Let’s do the Time Warp again!
Big Deal! I’m a time traveler too. I got here from the past.
I have a real problem when scientists who should know better exaggerate in a way that lead the average person to the conclusion that time travel into the past is possible. Although wormholes and folded space are mathematical constructs it is nothing more than that. The science here is good enough only for the purpose of writing science fiction that is good enough to satisfy the geek viewer. I think that they do a disservice to the scientific community.
I went and purchased the DVD this morning and did frame by frame analysis with enhancement. She is carrying a Blackberry and that is not a briefcase, it appears to be a shitty Dell netbook. The hat is black painted tin foil. The line from her stockings (actually queen size control top panyhose) up the back of her legs are the battery leads going into those big ass shoes. She also has a badge hanging around her neck on a lanyard that has a smiley face on it and the only letters I can make out are Wal…
She also has an ass antler tattoo with “Pedro” on it.
I just got here from the future. Going kill Grandpa.
Anyone seen him?
Anyone seen Spartacus? In one scene you can clearly see Kirk Douglas wearing a Rolex. Since they didn’t have Rolex’s in ancient Rome, Kirk Douglas must have been a time traveler.
Ahhh…. busted. He got me.
Hm.. But if it is not a timetravel then it could be a fake “1928” film.
Is the DVD made out of newly created stuff ? When is the DVD made ? and where do the original come from ? Hollywood, well they do fake reality all the time, so no time travel…. Sorry
A Star Trek TOS – Communicator.
It could have a woman testing her hearing aid. see this Western Electric Model 34A http://hearingaidmuseum.com/gallery/Carbon/WesternElectric/info/westelect34a.htm
I know quite a bit about the current state of physics theory. There is nothing preventing time from running in either direction.
There is nothing to prevent bosons or leptons from traveling in one or two (or more) directions in time.
There is nothing to prevent time from folding in on itself.
This all being said, there is very, very little evidence of a biological entity, so incredibly complex compared to a boson or lepton, from negotiating any “portal” which winds back in time, and more so, from “landing” on the same planet, in the same point in “space” (relative), in the same dimensional universe, and, much more important, in the same physical mass as originally formed. In other words, unlikely to still be a working blob of protoplasm, unlikely to be on earth, and unlikely to be able to determine your destination in spacetime.
Tiny dimensions are “curled up” in our three dimemsionally relevant world. You could travel in the 7th dimension or the eighth, but you would not really want to do that. Being as they are the size of the Planck length. 10×10 -33 CM.
So an old lady with a phone? About the same relevance as the alien abortion film of about twelve years ago.
But it’s still possible.
Would a Siemens product, presumably made in Germany, be in California in 1928?
The host of the video looks like he is wearing a Star Trek the Original Series tunic.
Obviously Siemens put up that fake device on their page to try and cover up the time travelers.
SIEMENS OWNED BY FUTURE PEOPLE CONFIRMED!
#54 possible if you can do the math
I don’t know what she’s holding does not mean..it’s probably a cellphone because today someone holding something in that manner might have a cellphone. This is too silly, I think she’s holding her ear because Herbert Hoover slapped her upside her head and I say my theory is much more plausible
The earth is moving about 6 million miles per day in our solar systems galactic orbit add that to our orbit around the sun and the expansion of the universe itself and if you could travel through time you’d be out in cold empty space when you landed as the earth is no longer there.
Never did see a “device.”
They look like hired extras walking in the background. Overweight woman is saying stuff to the guy walking in front of her. Something like “How many more times are we going to have to shoot this stupid scene.”
She has her hand on netting attached to the underside of her hat, to keep it from blowing off in the breeze. Could not resist sneaking a peek at the camera.
Had to shut the narrator off halfway through. Could not bear to hear any more of his babbling baloney.
#52 – It’s magical!
http://tinyurl.com/25ql57n
Mallet, unfortunately violates Clark’s 1st law,i.e. (anytime a distinguished scientist says something is not possible, he is almost certainly wrong) and Mallet makes a completely idiotic assumption, i.e. time travel is not possible into the past until someone makes a time machine. What if a time machine was invented by some alien scientist billions of years ago? What if the big bang was the first original time machine? I find Mallet most unimpressive, and therefor, unbelievable.
Yeah, let’s believe a conspiracy theory from a guy who’s hero is Jackie Chan, and he can’t tell the difference between Jackie Chan and Bruce Lee.
Wonderful, just wonderful.
Sorry I don’t see a phone I see an old woman talking into her hand. When I was younger and could be politically incorrect we called a person like this a bag lady.
Not a time traveler but simply an Alien caught on camera as it walked among us talking on its personal communication device.
The large shoes are necessary to accommodate the large
lizard feet.