Pretty screwy. Unless the clip is a hoax. Here is some background on the possibilities.

Thanks to Zamir Humud.




  1. pimmsley says:

    Ooh shivers…. except that in order for the cell phone to work you would have to have taken a cell tower and telecommunications infrastructure to make a call on it in 1928… or would you ? oooooh… 😉

  2. the Freaky Tiki says:

    I remember when I used to come to this site for technology news and commentary. I will allow technology to explain this mystery:

    http://hearing.siemens.com/sg/10-about-us/01-our-history/milestones.jsp?year=1924

    the Tiki

  3. jobs says:

    Talk about “more bars in more places”. Well I guess the cell towers weren’t overly taxed in 1928.

  4. Shubee says:

    I’m happy to hear how busy the high-priests of physics are in fabricating wonderful just-so stories. But let’s be clear about one thing. These priests are temple prostitutes and they certainly aren’t doing real science.

  5. Maricopa says:

    Nobody holds a phone like that. And I guess time travellers don’t mind demonstrating advanced technology to passing cameras and people. Hmmm. Dress to fit in but chat on your iPhone? One good thing it seems the future has given up on blue tooth. A very good case of hearing hoof beats and looking for zebras.

  6. ± says:

    Do you believe in free will?

    If so, traveling into the past can be ruled out simply because you (theoretically) know what everyone will/has do/done. And accordingly they have no choice but to do it since it already happened. That isn’t free will in exactly the same way as it isn’t free will if there is a ominpotent, omniscient, omnipresent, invisible friend in the sky.

    However, this doesn’t preclude ONE WAY travel into the future where you are just as clueless now about what will happen one minute from now as you will be when your arrive in the future.

    [ONE WAY means you can’t come back; sorry, I think I need to say this for the benefit of some of the posters on this blog]

  7. bill says:

    It’s all true!

    I AM FROM THE FUTURE!

  8. cgp says:

    Perhaps she is adjusting something on her hat.
    Perhaps a flower.

    Pathetic.

  9. McCullough says:

    Good stuff. It’s Halloween guys, lighten up.

  10. Dallas says:

    What does Sara Palin think about this?

  11. angry_rhino says:

    Was the clip taken of the general public outside the theater, or were the people in the clip extras who were hired to walk past the camera? If they were hired extras, they were likely told what to do and how to behave. Personally, I’m betting on the old hearing-aid theory. No one from a society capable of time travel would still be using a cell phone (or a device that looks like one). They would probably have an implanted device or one so small it could be concealed in a tie pin.

  12. denacron says:

    I would sell my soul for a bit of time travel.

  13. LaMoora says:

    Verizon is looking for this lady. With the accumulated late fees, she has a whopper of a bill.

  14. Shubee says:

    I don’t see a device. I see a shadow.

  15. Somebody_Else says:

    Lame. I can’t believe I just sat through three minutes of this attention whore promoting himself to see an old person with a headache.

  16. Dallas says:

    Can you hear me now?

    Oldie but goodie.

  17. Special Ed says:

    I once hit a guy so hard it killed his whole family. Figure that one out…

  18. Steve says:

    The flip side of this has always amused me. How many futuristic stories, films, paintings, ect. from the past looking forward to the early 21rst century depict a typical street scene of today with most people walking around hand to ear ?

  19. chuck says:

    She is holding fer iPhone wrong.

  20. I think #2 nailed it..please check it out…

    hearing aid in 1924

  21. Spike says:

    It is clearly a walkie-talkie.

    You can even see the black antenna as she turns for reception and says “What?”.

  22. The Shoes says:

    No a single person mentioned the size of her shoes. They must be size 21 or so.

  23. Special Ed says:

    I don’t think #2 nailed it. Why would she be talking into a device meant for hearing amplification? Unless of course she/he/it was saying, “hah?” Those shoes had to be carrying the battery for this thing. They were some big fucking shoes.

  24. Chris Mac says:

    they obviously needed a woman in the scene but there weren’t any available.. so they had some dude dress up as one and hold his hand in front of his face. and he couldn’t resist mugging for the camera towards the end

  25. Muck says:

    That’s my neighbor! Now I know what they’ve been working on in their garage late into the night!

  26. digiital says:

    Wait so this guy does film and what not. And YET he has to capture the video using his video camera while recording his TV?? Well HELLOooooooooooooo Why couldn’t this guy figure out how to rip the DVD to capture that scene give use a better quality video clip and why the hell is he using the slow motion from the DVD player? Sheeeesh Amateurs..

  27. #24 — The hearing device was attached to a briefcase with the amp in it as shown in the Siemens 1924 document. When the woman turns for a split second you can see the briefcase.

    Mystery solved!

  28. Counterweight says:

    Talk about roaming charges!

  29. Eldon says:

    Yet another bloody product placement in a movie!

  30. Chris Mac says:

    i don’t read anything written in black


1

Bad Behavior has blocked 4600 access attempts in the last 7 days.