“Can I get my bribe now?”

This is one of those you can’t make this crap up stories unless you’re writing an over the top, satiric Hollywood movie script.

For months, reports have abounded here that the Afghan mercenaries who escort American and other NATO convoys through the badlands have been bribing Taliban insurgents to let them pass. Then came a series of events last month that suggested all-out collusion with the insurgents.
[…]
Although the investigation is not complete, the officials suspect that at least some of these security companies — many of which have ties to top Afghan officials — are using American money to bribe the Taliban. The officials suspect that the security companies may also engage in fake fighting to increase the sense of risk on the roads, and that they may sometimes stage attacks against competitors.

The suspicions raise fundamental questions about the conduct of operations here, since the convoys, and the supplies they deliver, are the lifeblood of the war effort.

“We’re funding both sides of the war,” a NATO official in Kabul said. The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the investigation was incomplete, said he believed millions of dollars were making their way to the Taliban.
[…]
The principal goal of the American-led campaign here is to prepare an Afghan state and army to fight the Taliban themselves. The possibility of collusion between the Taliban and Afghan officials suggests that, rather than fighting each another, the two Afghan sides may often cooperate under the noses of their wealthy benefactors.

There’s a 1984 undercurrent to this that’s finally reaching the surface. We’re paying both sides to stage a war so that the war keeps going. War without end, amen.

By the way, this war is now the longest war in our history.




  1. bobbo, Catch 22, best book in the world says:

    Bush was right about one thing: “The War is over.” (SIC!). USA won the wars in Iraq and Afghan years ago. Its nation building that we are failing at. We aren’t willing to kill dissonants so we fail in Iraq, and Afghan is too tribal. Free and Democratic societies require a foundation beyond raising sheep and women as if they were cattle.

    You can build a house with just a hammer, but not if you pound everything with it.

  2. Uncle Dave says:

    #29,30: One of my all time favorites, too. I remember reading the book before the film came out. Same with MASH. It wasn’t until I met a guy in college who had been in Vietnam (my draft number was too high to get called, so no first hand experience) and told me stories that made both seem like children’s books that I realized they weren’t just comedies.

    For some reason, despite some of the bizarre things that have been reported in Iraq and Afghanistan over the years, I have a feeling there won’t be the equivalent coming out of either war this time.

  3. bobbo, Catch 22, best book in the world says:

    Unc Dave==what makes a book great is its universality. The plot, themes, and characters of Catch-22 set in WW2 are immediately translatable to any other war at any other time and place. Universality.

    Will some author rewrite Catch-22 placed in Iraq or Afghan? Isn’t this very thread one chapter?

  4. GregAllen says:

    I assumed this was happening already.

    Why? Because that’s the way it works there. Everybody works two, three or more sides of any deal.

    Remember how Bush “out sources” bin Laden’s former allies to drive out the Taliban? The war lords took America’s millions and then they let bin Laden walk away. You can bet they also got money from bin Laden, too. And probably from someone else, as well!

    It’s how the culture of that region works and it’s not shameful for them — it’s just savvy business.

    Most Americans can’t begin to outsmart South and Central Asians in a business deal — let alone a scam. We are bush league compared to them.

    I honestly believe that Osama bin Laden simply outsmarted Bush Jr — he WANTED to bait America into invading Afghanistan and Bush was stupidly suckered hook, line and sinker.

    If Obama doesn’t have a clear and firm exit strategy from Afghanistan, he’ll be bin Laden’s sucker, too.

  5. GregAllen says:

    >> Mextli said, on June 8th, 2010 at 4:10 pm
    >> You mean the policy called appeasement that he learned from Chamberlain?

    You guys evoke Chamberlain every time you have a load of crap to sell.

    I don’t remember one conservative crying “Chamberlain” when Bush and Cheney started paying millions of our tax dollars to Muqtada al-Sadr to stop killing our soldiers.

  6. Stiffy says:

    Yeah, here we go with yet another Tar Baby for Western militarism, stuck fast in ancient tribal sinkholes again. When will they ever learn?


2

Bad Behavior has blocked 11585 access attempts in the last 7 days.