karzai_oil_corps

KABUL, Afghanistan — President Hamid Karzai said Tuesday that Afghanistan would not be able to pay for its own security until at least 2024, underscoring his government’s long-term financial dependence on the United States and NATO even as President Obama has pledged to begin withdrawing American troops in 2011. “For another 15 to 20 years, Afghanistan will not be able to sustain a force of that nature and capability with its own resources,” Mr. Karzai said, referring to the force required to secure the entire country.

Mr. Karzai spoke at a news conference here with the American secretary of defense, Robert M. Gates, who did not put a timetable on the American and allied financial commitment but acknowledged that there was a “realism on our part that it will be some time before Afghanistan is able to sustain its security forces entirely on its own.”

The news conference came just hours after as many as a dozen people were killed during an American raid in Laghman Province, Afghan officials said, prompting hundreds of villagers to march in protest.

Cripes…let’s just bite the bullet and make it the 51st state. Or was that 58th? I think it’s time we dumped this idiot and installed a different puppet.




  1. gmknobl says:

    Democrat’s war, hardly. Neocons got in there, butchered it up and now responsible people are trying to fix that mess. Unfortunately, we can’t afford to because of the mess made out of Iraq and what’s been done to our country in the guise of letting the rich have what they earned (read ripped others off for selfish gain) and not paying their due taxes.

    Look conservatives, you backed it and bought it. You’re the cause of most of the problems in the U.S. and abroad right now anyway, especially when you acquiesced to neocon selfishness. Sure there were some people calling themselves liberal who went along at times but real liberals have fought against everything that sucked since before Nixon.

    Diatribe over. Yep, it looks like Karzai might be just another corporate huxter. So either we’ve made another eventual third world banana dictatorship or it will succeed. Hopefully the latter but after not much longer we need to pull out, right our own ship and let the Afghanis succeed or fail on their own merits.

    And no, Obama was not and is not a real liberal but he was better than the alternative.

  2. Phydeau says:

    #29 Afghanistan doesn’t have enough of a middle class to have a functioning democracy.

    Obama apologist? I’m talking about Afghanistan and its middle class, not Obama. Looks like you’ve got Little Pedro disease… if anyone says anything that you can remotely link with favoring Obama, you immediately call them an Obama lapdog. Looks like a common wingnut syndrome. Just because you slavishly worshiped Dubya, doesn’t mean that the people who disagree with you worship the other guy. Shades of gray, grasshopper.

    And why don’t you let #17 answer the question I posed to him.

  3. The0ne says:

    #23
    You really don’t understand what I’ve just talked about, or rather what sagasso had reminded me about. I wondering why I’m not surprise but then I know why.

    Truly, sometimes western thinking is so bad and brainwashed that I still find myself shocked and few times appalled. It must be the way we think or see it or else it’s not true.

    Democracy to a lot of people, especially 3rd world countries does in a sense translate to freedom and liberty. It is because they know the democracy will provide them the opportunity that they never really had.

    My mountain farming parents wouldn’t know what the word Democracy means but when you explain that it means you at least get to choose, that is freedom…freedom to do what one think is right.

    I feel like I’m wasting my words and energy here, :/

  4. RBG says:

    31. gmknobl “no, Obama was not and is not a real liberal but he was better than the alternative.”

    You mean the alternative that employed Obama’s Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates; increased troops with surge because it worked in Iraq; and continued to fight both wars simultaneously? That alternative?

    RBG

  5. The0ne says:

    Well, I wasn’t going to post anymore seeing how futile it seems but I believe it warrants another explanation to make people here don’t go off on a tangent with comments to support their own.

    This is about a person or a group of people doing what they can in very difficult times to try to make a change within their country. Most times, as history has shown us, one does not have to be from the middle class or upper class to “deserve” this right. And certainly democracy does not depend on whether or not you have those two classes. Using this argument would mean we should literally be cavemens still. Democracy, freedom, liberty and all of what most of us hold true in this country does not require anything beyond one’s right to each of them.

    Trust me, my post was sarcasm at it’s highest with respect to not insult you directly. But it seems it has flown pass you completely. Your kudos means nothing since you don’t understand the discussion in the first place. It made you feel good I’m sure but totally unwarranted 🙂

    And lastly, your western view of “classes” are subjective. Please don’t attempt to classify other countries to what you consider the norm here. You don’t think there are no middle classes but in fact there are, even in a communist, imperialist and totalitarian society/government.

    Be thankful and fortunate you are here in the US where you don’t have to “trek” anywhere or do anything to “deserve” your rights.

  6. Ah_Yea says:

    Hold it TheOne!

    Don’t drop out just because this blog has a couple of complete loons, Phydeau being one of the more notable. Dallas not one whit behind, either.

    Just remember that insanity is a disease, and feel sorry for them. But don’t allow their sickness to affect what you know to be true and right.

    Also remember that for every crazy commenter, 100 other readers got something good from your post.

  7. Phydeau says:

    #36 It takes brave people to stage a revolution. Revolution is always possible, but without a vibrant middle class the result isn’t much better than what you start with. Witness the Russians swapping the Czars for the Communists. And China didn’t do so well in their revolution either.

    And I never used the word “deserve”. I’m not making any judgments on who “deserves” freedom. I’m just saying, once you have freedom, whether you can achieve a democracy depends on what kind of middle class you have. And that’s not just me saying that, it’s what historical scholars have said.

    All of our views of class are subjective. Mine, yours, everyone’s. So chill on that one.

    And look at your attitude… I’m trying to have a rational, reasonable conversation about democracy, and you’re arrogant and insulting. One of the important qualifications for living in a democracy, for those of you from totalitarian backgrounds, is the ability to converse reasonably with people who have different viewpoints than yours. You would do well to learn that lesson. Maybe “kill the unbelievers” worked back in the old country, but it doesn’t work here.

    Thought our current generation of wingnuts seems to be trying to bring it back. They think that anyone who disagrees with their views hates America. They were born and raised here, and they don’t understand democracy.

    #37 Excellent combination of smarmy fake sympathy, brown-nosing, and just plain ignorance there, pal. Good job. 🙂

  8. Phydeau says:

    http://theonion.com/content/node/56093

    “Rebels Immediately Regret Seizing Power In Zambia”

    Like so many excellent articles from The Onion, the humor has a bitter ring of truth to it. Just a sample:

    “For years, we watched our beloved homeland suffer from strife and infirmity, knowing that something drastic had to be done,” UDF second-in-command Ngoube Mtumbe said. “Why we decided that that something was to take over this godforsaken graveyard of a country instead of just getting the fuck out, I’ll never know.”

    “We did not sign up for this,” he added. “Seven-hundred-thousand AIDS orphans? Come on!”

    Mtumbe, a UDF fighter with over 14 years of demolitions experience and nearly three hours of administrative practice, said that members of the rebellion were so caught up in the bloodthirsty struggle for power that they lost sight of what it would mean to be in power in a country as terrible as Zambia.

    “The fact that there wasn’t a single standing railroad bridge, power station, or radio tower for us to destroy should have been a pretty clear sign that Zambia wasn’t exactly the most stable of places,” Mtumbe said. “Our supposed capitol building doesn’t even have a front door, for crying out loud.”

    Mtumbe, who was trying to figure out what paperwork was necessary to declare a national state of emergency, said he was still kicking himself for killing countless U.N. peacekeepers well-acquainted with the complicated relief process, and for decapitating the Minister of Transportation, who was “obviously in that position for a reason.”

    Yeah… try setting up a democracy in that situation. 🙁

  9. chris says:

    #29

    You laughed off my suggestion that Afghanistan is mostly a place that gets conquered. Instead it is the “graveyard of empires”(not your formulation, I’m sure). But that is wrong.

    Afghanistan has dominated no empire. The USSR was destroyed because its system was non-functional. The British Empire was destroyed by WWII. Alexander the Great’s army got skittish when faced with Indian armies. The Mongols became part of the societies they controlled.

    H’mmm. Not seeing a graveyard. Afghanistan might rather be called the “highway of civilizations.” That makes it something that gets run over by more energetic states every now and then.

    Many empires have left, but that is because nothing inherent in Afghanistan makes it worthwhile to stay. Afghanistan is just a place that is on the way to another more important place.

    It is not a state. It is not a democracy. When America leaves it won’t be substantively different than its history. It just won’t be on the news anymore, so we won’t bother talking about it.

    You say that many people on the blog are stupid. I don’t think that’s true at all. Many people are ideologically committed; that is a different matter entirely.

    If you don’t want to talk politics on a blog that touches on it don’t talk. Don’t hate the player, hate the game.

  10. Phydeau says:

    #40 Well Chris, looks like the wingnuts have run for cover once again.

    Ah_Yea, your capitulation is duly noted and graciously accepted. Better luck next time. 🙂

    And TheOne, maybe you should calm down a bit.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 4661 access attempts in the last 7 days.