bobbo, addicted to tv says:

“If this is typical of the political discourse happening in the US, there is no hope.” /// Well, you are close. This is typical of right wing talk radio and tv. That’s about 20% of the USA and about 90% of the political right in the USA.

So crazy–its not even really “political” speech in any sane context. I blame religion and the lack of education and thinking skills it inspires.

jescott418 says:

I watched this and sometimes Coulter is right on target and others she is just plain extremists. One reason if you are a moderate conservative you cannot be Republican. Would not surprise me to see a Independent become more popular in the next election. The Right are going too far right and the Left is doing the same. Much to the dismay of many of us who are in the middle. Main reason government is doing so poorly. No compromise!

Rufus says:

Two brainless potty mouths, not just one.

But to be fair 98% of liberals are never as open-minded as they claim.

Liberals and conservatives are equally racist and stupid… by design.

srgothard says:

Ann Coulter is a better at writing than interviewing because interviewers seldom let her finish her points. George Bush was hated by so many people that I agree with her that Obama is probably not getting more threats that Bush was.

Similarly, she never says that being liberal makes you an assassin. She is stating that all presidential assassins were liberals (as Dvorak pointed out in the title). If that is true, why are we mad at her? If it is not, then the interviewer should attempt to show otherwise. The truth is the truth. People who are telling the truth should not be hated and judged. People who are afraid of the truth should be.

Civengine says:

Actually, thinking on it, she may be right, er correct, from the standpoint that in their day, society generally associated these assassins with an agenda of radical change to the status quo. What really binds them is that most were just plain nuts. Garfield was killed by a Republican, btw.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_presidential_assassination_attempts_and_plots

tcc3 says:

And how is trying to impress Jodie Foster a liberal idea? What he wasn’t successful, so it doesn’t count?

bobbo, the evangelical anti-theist says:

#12–tcc==I thought of Hinkly. He was trying to impress a liberal hollywood actress. Thats got liberal all over it.

Try again.

Dallas says:

I want to know why hasn’t someone punched that transvestite on that giraffe neck yet?

bobbo, the evangelical anti-theist says:

#20–honeyman==so you are saying that by definition to argue by definition is glib, and therefore my arguing by definition that liberal = change is glib?

by golly, I think you’ve got it.

All thats left then is to argue about definitions. Not a totally wasteful way to pass time, depending on how you define waste?

But anarchists==yes, I guess they would kill to stop things from changing and that opens the door to just what power to change a president has. America has never been big on anarchists. Silly group, too close to LIEBERTARIANS and other such silly isolationists.

I like Ann by the way until she gets off onto religion: “there is no proof for evolution.” I heard her say that once.

Mr. Fusion says:

Anyone who has ever watched Joy Behar before knows she was restraining herself during this interview. I believe she would have loved to throttle that scrawny giraffe neck into a pretzel as a favor to all those Coulter has slandered in the past.

its the little laugh they both have

Behar was laughing at Coulter. Coulter was laughing because of the vibrator up his butt.

Phydeau says:

Ann Coulter is a sick f*ck. But the more people associate her with the Republican party, the better.

LibertyLover says:

#27, The same reason a democrat would — they refuse to do what you tell them to do.

The Monster's Lawyer says:

I wouldn’t f*ck her with your dick.