From the you-can’t-make-this-crap-up-department, unless you’re dealing with mortgages in Florida:

“Due to state foreclosure laws, lenders are obligated to name and notify subordinate lien holders,” said Wells Fargo spokesman Kevin Waetke.

Being a taxpayer-subsidized, too-big-to-fail institution, it’s possible that one of the few ways for Wells Fargo & Co. to know what it is doing is to notify itself with a court filing.

In this particular case, Wells Fargo holds the first and second mortgages on a condominium, according to Sarasota, Fla., attorney Dan McKillop, who represents the condo owner.

As holder of the first, Wells Fargo is suing all other lien holders, including the holder of the second, which is itself.
[…]
Wells Fargo’s defense lawyers even filed an answer to their client’s own complaint.

“Defendant admits that it is the owner and holder of a mortgage encumbering the subject real property,” the answer reads. “All other allegations of the complaint are denied.”

This is even dumber than the lending practices that led to this foreclosure mess, yet this is what the court record says. I learned about this from “The Consumer Warning Network” Web site, which posted an article by Angie Moreschi titled, “Have The Banks Gone Crazy?”

“We’ve apparently reached the perfect storm for complete and utter idiocy by some banks trying to foreclose on homes,” Moreschi wrote.

McKillop, the condo owner’s attorney, told me he thinks Wells Fargo doesn’t know what it’s doing, and that its lawyers figure it is all billable hours to them.




  1. bballhead says:

    Is this simply to line the lawyers pockets?

  2. Mr. Fusion says:

    This is strictly keeping legal procedures. If WF didn’t name itself then it could end up losing any claim on the second mortgage. A Judge makes his decisions on what is in front of him, he can’t guess or put something into the record on his own.

    But it sure sounds silly.

  3. nikgare says:

    Your bail out money’s paying for this fiasco – doesn’t it make you feel proud?

  4. newrepublican says:

    Ignoramus! Wells Fargo didn’t ask for bailout money in the 1st place – and repaid it as soon as legally allowed. Taxpayers own none of WF.

    If you read the 1st sentence of an admittedly convoluted post of a copy of a post of a whatever – you’d know WF is complying with Florida state law.

    Which is, after all, written by lawyers and other crooked politicians.

    Cripes. Which is it? 6th grade reading levels? Or comprehension?

  5. AdmFubar says:

    seem the banks are being controlled be the spirit of rod serling

  6. Mr. Fusion says:

    #4, new,

    Wells Fargo claims they didn’t want the TARP funds but were forced to take it. Not exactly. They were forced to take it by their regulator as they were under capitalized at the time.

    They have NOT paid it back as the FED feels they are still too under capitalized to pay it. They were told they had to raise almost $14 Billion in private, non government backed capitol by November to be rated sound. So far they have only found less than $9 B.

  7. Mr. Fusion says:

    RE #6,

    For a source, I should have added this.

  8. killer duck says:

    Wow imagine that, lawyers taking advantage of federal bailout funds to sue themselves. Who would have ever thought lawyers could be so tricky.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 4651 access attempts in the last 7 days.