1. Jägermeister says:

    Perhaps he committed suicide? How about some old whale removal?

    Seriously… How many whales does Japan kill every year?

  2. Ah_Yea says:

    Forget crude! Whale oil is the new thing!

    It’s non-toxic, biodegradable, and a renewable resource!

    Perfect!!

  3. MikeN says:

    Most oil spills are natural.

  4. bob says:

    Exxon? Valdez? sounds familiar

  5. nobrakes says:

    However cruel and inhuman this may be – I don’t think i need to remind anyone that a 200000-400000 ton 300meter vessel cannot stop or turn on a dime. if something like that surfaces that close to ship – there isn’t much they can do about it.
    According to the news article i read they were not even sure 1)that that tanker hit it – and 2) that it was even alive when it was struck – assuming that said tanker even hit it.

  6. ECA says:

    #3..
    ?????? Ummmm, NO!

    Natural as in, the BOAT SANK?
    Natural as in, the Storm destroyed the ship?
    Natural as in, the pressure head BLEW OFF?
    Natural as in, THE BEVERLY HILLBILLIES??
    Natural as in, the ship is 40-60 years old and has RUST and LEAKS??

    Nature has a way to letting it pour out, NOT SUCKING IT OUT by the SHIP LOAD.

  7. ArianeB says:

    #3 That’s a pretty extraordinary claim.

    Dr. Carl Sagan: “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence”

    Do you have the extraordinary evidence to back it up? or are you just bullshitting us?

  8. edwinrogers says:

    It happens a lot. I saw a coastal bulk carrier entering our harbor with a dead Minke whale wedged under the bow.

  9. where is the blog entry? the content part?

  10. Ah_Yea says:

    #3 MikeN isn’t too far off. Here is the rundown.

    http://oils.gpa.unep.org/facts/sources.htm

    Full of fun facts.

  11. Nimby says:

    #9 – it was a test of the intelligence of the average DU reader. Smart ones would do a Google search to discover the content. Users of average intelligence might go to Bing or Yahoo. You, uhmm, fall into a third group. But here’s a link to an article for you.
    http://scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=dead-whale-found-on-bow-o

  12. Hugh Ripper says:

    Arn’t you supposed to nuke the whales?

  13. Zybch says:

    #11 You seriously believe that only smart people use google? Google’s search has become so utterly useless recently and most of its results just dump you sites trying to sell you crap, I rarely use it any more.
    Bing actually seems to give me the results I want, and yahoo? Whats that.

  14. MikeN says:

    #11, and Fusion would demand that you provide him with a link.

  15. MikeN says:

    #6, natural as in
    SEEPING up from the ocean fLOOr.

    Drilling actually reduces this amount of natural oil spill by relieving pressure.

  16. Bobs Bar says:

    #12, Hugh Ripper, according to the bumper sticker, it’s

    “Nuke A Gay Whale For Christ”

    so the answer is “maybe.”

  17. Mr. Fusion says:

    #16, Lyin’ Mike,

    While I don’t doubt oil seepage happens, you have still not given any links as asked by ArianeB in #7.

    #10, Ah Yea,

    It appears from your link that most oil / petroleum entering the seas are man made.

  18. deowll says:

    The headline was total Crap. We have no way to know how this thing died based on what was reported! It may have been dead when it was hit or not. Most whales are alert enough not to let anything large near them because killer whales do eat them. The ones that aren’t may not be all that healthy.

  19. trking says:

    yes yes.. those poor poor oil companies, it would be faaaar too expensive to investigate, it might very well bankrupt them.

    best to just sink the damn thing instead! -shh

  20. This is an interesting take on the concept. I never thought of it that way. I came across this site recently which I think will be of great use http://www.whales.org.za . Check it out!
    Big thanks for keeping me entertained.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 5912 access attempts in the last 7 days.