JimD says:

What would you expect from Dildo O’Liely ???

bobbo says:

#36–whats it all about Alfie?==if “a priori” a fish swims what does that tell us of a man walking?

Mr. Fusion says:

#36, Alphie, the Qualude Queen

If O’Reilly’s fictional work is relevant to analysis of world events,

It isn’t. What is relevant is his condemnation of actions that he has approved of in his other words. Yes, it may be fiction, but that is not an excuse. He has condemned the porn industry when he himself has written it. He blamed a rape victim because of the way she was dressed as if that has something to do with the fact she was assaulted when he has written it

In other words, for the critically challenged, your argument is unsound, and my Obama “analogy” is supposed illustrate that fact EVEN to you, a very irrational person.

The second clause is totally incomprehensible.

The question isn’t whether presidents experimented with drugs, the issue is whether YOUR reasoning is sound

Ah, Alphie, you just condemned Obama because he admitted using drugs as a youth. That is the whole thrust of your argument. In #14 you wrote

Good…now Obama’s past drug associates and customers need to come out…and tell us all about Obama’s words to them…

Its relevant.

I don’t see anything in that post about MY reasoning being sound. I asked you to show some proof that he sold drugs(post #25). Yes, he admitted experimenting in his book. You didn’t give us any proof he ever sold drugs, a much more serious accusation.

Now, instead of supplying anything to back up your accusation, you want to claim my reasoning is unsound. Instead of replying to the question, you attack the questioner.

Is that what “god” told you to do?

bobbo says:

#40–Fusion==you already have Paddy-Zero appropriately labeled as “Phony Climate Scientist” which is what that post was about.

If you start listing his abscesses, warts, and open sores, the spam filter will catch you for excessive length.

Mr. Fusion says:

#43, Alphie, Quaalude Queen,

I still haven’t seen anything backing up your accusation that Obama sold drugs. I do see a lot of obfuscation, word play, ad hominems, and bullshit.

So? where is your evidence that Obama sold drugs?

AND

Please explain this sentence:

In other words, for the critically challenged, your argument is unsound, and my Obama “analogy” is supposed illustrate that fact EVEN to you, a very irrational person.

Geeze, my nine y/o writes better than that. Yes, I know it’s a blog but I did ask you to explain it before.

Mr. Fusion says:

#44, Stooopid Lyin’ Mike,

>There are very few successful writers that have written porn and serious literature.

I see you haven’t read much serious literature, …

Since the discussion is about authors and not literature, you are demonstrating your new moniker. Ann Rice might be successful, but I don’t think of her as serious. J.K. Rowlings on the other hand, is a serious writer.

Greg Allen says:

Ironic isn’t it? The movement that has preached its moral virtues for decades reveals itself to be a shameful moral disaster.

But we liberals, who preach tolerance, are no worse — and often better than they.

Greg Allen says:

Mr. Fusion,

Shakespeare was pretty bawdy for his day, if I remember my college literature class correctly.

We miss a lot of it, because of the flowery old English but it was pretty sexual.

But, unlike O’Reilly, Shakespeare didn’t make a career of preaching moral virtue.

This book doesn’t even bother me much — writing about creepy stuff does not make a person sleazy. (necessarily)

If you want to see what a REAL LIFE sleezebag O’Reilly is — go find the deposition to his sexual harassment suit on Smoking Gun or similar.

And, we know perfectly well that O’Reailly not unique at all — the loudest preachers of “family values” in the conservative movement have proven themselves to be total moral disasters in their own lives: Limbaugh, Haggard, Gingrich, Dole, McCain, Craig, — the whole pack of ’em.

Paddy-O says:

And, the libs are STILL squealing like stuck pigs on this thread. Hilarious.

Mr. Fusion says:

#53, Stooopid Lyin’ Mike

Your point? The point you ever made was that one between your ears on top that causes your hat to fall off.

Allen lost his Senate seat because he screwed up. He called a spectator a slur. He was in a close race against a conservative Democrat. He couldn’t articulate during his debate. In other words, he blew it. Most of all, he was on Bushes side.

Regardless, none of that has anything to do with O’Reilly.