Obama 2008

After news broke this week about a North Carolina factory tied to bacteria-tainted syringes that killed five patients, criminal investigators revealed a telling fact: The company’s “chief microbiologist” was a teenage high school dropout. This week, two former employees of the AM2PAT manufacturing center in Angier, N.C., pleaded guilty in federal court to charges related to falsifying documents and shipping bacteria-tainted syringes full of blood thinners meant for patients receiving intravenous fluids.

Authorities are still seeking the company’s owner, who will face a 10-count indictment. In addition to the deaths, more than 200 people were sickened by contaminated syringes. The case raises a glaring question: As this biological tragedy was taking shape, where was the agency charged with standing between Americans and deadly medicine?

The Food and Drug Administration, it turns out, was aware of problems at the 40-employee lab as early as 2005. According to a letter it released Wednesday to ProPublica and the Raleigh News & Observer, the FDA warned the company in August of 2005 about “serious violations” and ordered the firm to change its practices. During a June 2005 inspection of the company, the FDA found nine “significant [quality] violations,” the letter says.

The company failed to conduct routine tests on its syringe-filling machine. The daily log of the “clean room” was only filled out once a month, the letter states. The company’s complaint-response system was in disarray. And employees were not properly trained: One was chewing gum while filling syringes; another was “improperly gowning” during sterility tests.

FYI.




  1. Dallas says:

    President Obama certainly has his work cut out in front of him.

    He’s trying to get the country to soar like Eagles and find himself to have inherited a turkeys placed in position of power by Bush and cronies.

    The picture is a good one

  2. GigG says:

    There have been asswipes and idiots working for government and I really doubt that more were hired by the Bush admin than any other admin R or D or that will be hired under to O admin. It sort of goes with government employment.

  3. jescott418 says:

    All I can say is we definitely do not want more government. Not just because their stupid and misspend funds. But they don’t do what they are supposed to do. The SEC is another example of a government entity that fails to do what its designed to do. What is more regulation going to do if the agency does not follow its guidance.

  4. pfkad says:

    #2, GigG: Ha, ha! Oh so true! I just left a Gov’t worker’s office where a 10 minute job took an hour to complete because the dim bulb that was serving me had just come back from vacation and had forgotten her network password. I’ll bet she puts a Post-it on her monitor before she leaves next time!

  5. Phydeau says:

    #3 jescott418 — so you don’t like government? Hey, let’s get rid of the FDA completely then! Let those nice syringe-making companies do whatever they want without burdensome government regulation, without silly rules about cleanliness and proper training. Gosh, things would be a lot better then.

    Yeah, it worked so well on Wall Street.

  6. Paddy-O says:

    # 5 Phydeau said, “so you don’t like government? Hey, let’s get rid of the FDA completely then!”

    Sounds good to me. Most gov agencies serve no useful purpose yet suck plenty of $ from citizens wallets.

  7. Phydeau says:

    Thanks for the troll perspective, Paddy-O. 🙂

  8. Breetai says:

    That damn Bush!

  9. Li says:

    #3 OK, so what do you propose then, since self-regulation gives us teenage dropout chief microbiologists, and birds shitting directly into the peanut butter vats?

  10. EvilPoliticians says:

    More oversight will only lead to more inefficient bureaucracy and higher taxes.

    What is needed is more accountability. Put the guilty in jail and throw away the key. As it stands now, all they need is a good lawyer to get nothing more than a slap on the wrist.

  11. soundwash says:

    ::sigh: -all part of the plan.

    take some time and do background on the
    decision makers at the FDA. -none of this
    should be surprising..except, maybe, the timing of the story..

    -s

  12. Mr. Fusion says:

    The problem here isn’t that the FDA couldn’t do their job. It was that their supervisors wouldn’t allow the investigators to do their jobs.

    A 2006 report [9] by the House oversight committee raised an alarm about FDA supervisors overriding the concerns of field investigators and refusing to issue warning letters to medical device makers.

    In the case at hand, it appears that the FDA may have been too eager to take AM2PAT’s word that it fixed problems after the 2005 letter and follow-up inspection the next year, said Dr. Ned Feder, a former scientist with the National Institutes of Health who now researches FDA issues at the advocacy group Project On Government Oversight.

    (from the linked article)

    That supervision was either Bush appointed or, in turn, Bush supervised.

    Yes, we can blame the FDA for its lack of oversight. That though shows two things. The first is the influence the political appointees can have on regulatory and oversight functions and the weakness the FDA has in enforcing compliance.

  13. Mr. Fusion says:

    Eff eff eff,

    That second block quote should have been closed. It is not part of the original article.

    Sorry for my sloppiness.

  14. Rick Cain says:

    Funny how all this stuff started showing up after January 21, 2009. Obama must have looked through the pile of papers on his desk and said “you got to be kiddng me!”.

    I wonder how the Bushie supporters here will spin it, I relish the thought! (rubbing hands)


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 4495 access attempts in the last 7 days.