I think this would be hilarious. A radical left wing intellectual and, well, Sarah. More fun than a barrel of Limbaughs!
Sarah Palin once accused Barack Obama of “palling around with terrorists,” a catchphrase intended to highlight Obama’s connection to former Weather Underground member Bill Ayers.
Now that the campaign rhetoric has subsided, Ayers has an idea for a new show starring his Alaskan nemesis.
“I did send her a note after the election,” he says of Palin in the upcoming issue of the New York Times magazine. “I suggested that we have a talk show together called ‘Pallin’ Around With Sarah and Bill.’ I haven’t heard back.”
This would be among the worst ideas Palin could ever consider. Face it, she is no intellectual heavyweight.
She is too much of an airhead to have a show of her own let alone spar with a normal person.
Bill Ayers is a murderer who skirted justice on a technicality. What could he possibly have to say of any value? At least Palin shows some sense of character staying clear of this criminal.
Can you really fit more than one Limbaugh in a barrel?
A terrorist an intellectual? Now THAT is funny.
Talk about something that would gag a maggot.
Actually, it would be cool to get them in a studio together. I wonder how many holes she could put in center of mass within 3 seconds?
#3, “tempt,
Bill Ayers is a murderer who skirted justice on a technicality.
Would you care to show us any proof that Ayers actually made and detonated a bomb? Then you can tell us the “technicality” that got him off.
NOPE.
I will not listen to that crazy Moosalini bitch and her stupid wink till at least 2013.
However, I would listen to Ayers, the professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago and his contributions on social justice, urban educational reform, narrative and interpretive research, children in trouble with the law.
This is such typical right wing nut buffoonery. We have one person calling him a bomb throwing murderer and another wondering how quickly Palin could shoot him.
The truly stupid part of all this, these wing nuts don’t even know of Ayers complicity in any activities. All they know is what Limbaugh told them.
# 11 Mr. Fusion said, “The truly stupid part of all this, these wing nuts don’t even know of Ayers complicity in any activities.”
The truly pathetic part of this is that libs can’t read…
“I don’t regret setting bombs,” Bill Ayers said. “I feel we didn’t do enough.”
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F02E1DE1438F932A2575AC0A9679C8B63
Get her while she’s HOT!!
#14 Sure bud.
First, I don’t consider some schmuck named Pedro grading opinions as being particularly important.
Second, I don’t look to Dvorak conservative, narrow minded and issue cherry picking pinheads to broaden my horizons.
#14 – Pedro, after Libs get corrected on their erroneous data they start the personal attacks. Predicable, and tired. But, at least they are consistent…
#12, Cow-Patty,
“I don’t regret setting bombs,” Bill Ayers said. “I feel we didn’t do enough.”
to which Ayers promptly replied.
The reporter has never clarified nor made available the tape from the interview. But Ayers has been consistent in his denials. Quite unlike Cow-Patty who makes unfounded claims then says others can’t read.
I’m still waiting for that Frank quote.
#14, ‘dro,
Since you seem so smart, could you tell us how many people did Ayers kill or injure with his bombs?
#17 Read this: http://tinyurl.com/bm3xz2
Done deal.
#18 Probably less than those committed by other earlier acts of ‘terrorism’ – like the Boston Tea Party.
Conservative pinheads owe their current liberty to former ‘radicals’ and a host of sons of liberty. They probably drink Samuel Adams beer not knowing he was a firebrand radical in his days.
Is there a Bill Ayers beer in the making?
#19, Cow-Patty,
You are still an ash whole
You make bad claims and refuse to back them up. Almost every comment.
Paddy, your troll failed. Ayer’s words (at your link) make you look like a fool in the context of this thread. Thank you.
BTW, your reply to me will be oh so predictable. Don’t bother.
In the theme of this thread…
Any show featuring Bill Ayers is sure to bomb.
Ouch.
#20, Dallas,
BTW, that was a good response back there in #15.
These ditto heads have no idea what the hell they are writing about. They hear some total lie on their favorite wing nut broadcast and think that is the truth. The link that Cow-Patty posted actually shows how he, and the other wing nuts, lied about Ayers.
I don’t necessarily agree with Ayers take but it is well opined and argued.
I love laughing at stupid people. The only thing funnier and dumber than NeoCons are the Libs who think their smart.
#26, ‘dro,
I see you are still avoiding the questions. How many bombs did Ayers build and how many people were killed or injured by those bombs?
#24 Mr Fusion
>>I don’t necessarily agree with Ayers
Then why are you going to such great lengths to defend this bomb throwing terrorist? Could it be as simple as he is of the party and the party must be defended no matter what.
#28, ‘tempt,
How many bombs did Ayers make and how many people did he kill or injure?
I think the correct question is- How many people did OJ kill?
Catch my drift
While the Bush presidency perfectly personified the end-came of Reagan conservatism, the McCain-Palin campaign perfectly personified the conservative campaign strategy.
#32, ‘dro,
YOU keep claiming Ayers is a mad bomber. Well, how many bombs did he make? How many people ended up killed or injured because of his bombings?
FYI, I haven’t defended Ayers. I am only attempting to have you wing nuts post something more honest than your usual baseless rants.
If he gets his own show, it could be “A(y)rsing Around With Bill”.
Why doesn’t Palin go on a show with that one guy she kept/keeps mentioning: Hugh Boetcha?
J/P=?