article-1142566-037e2712000005dc-944_468x646

Comments anyone? Click for one more… if you dare. Nadya needs your money, you can go to her website and lay down your credit card here.




  1. FRAGaLOT says:

    CA has been broke long before this bitch was ever born herself. CA’s always been in debt.

  2. deadpixel says:

    this is just foul…

    but it does bring us one step forward to some sort of test/s to be allowed to breed.

  3. Olo Baggins of Bywater says:

    This whole situation is sick, and that photo is gross.

  4. Thinker says:

    Yes this is a new type of insanity. How did she get these treatments anyway?? I heard it was IVF?? What program is paying for that?? There’s where the story is.

  5. Paddy-O says:

    # 2 FRAGaLOT said, “CA’s always been in debt.”

    Wrong. 1996, $ 1 billion surplus… Downhill since then.

  6. Miguel says:

    Oh!!

    My!!

    Fucking!!

    God!!

    !!!!

    Is there any provision for psychiatric treatment for this weirdo?

    This looks like something out of ‘Alien’…

  7. Gary, the dangerous infidel says:

    #1 Paddy-O, we have a woman who has some degree of mental impairment, and a doctor who gave her far more freedom of choice than she should have had. What would be your preferred “less government” solution in this case?

  8. Paddy-O says:

    # 5 Thinker said, “How did she get these treatments anyway?? I heard it was IVF?? What program is paying for that??”

    CA State disability:
    After an on-the-job injury, octuplets mom Nadya Suleman went on state disability and was paid nearly $170,000 in benefits between 2000 and 2008 for injuries to her back, neck and shoulder.

  9. Paddy-O says:

    # 8 Gary, the dangerous infidel said, “What would be your preferred “less government” solution in this case?”

    Yes, if the Gov’t hadn’t given her taxpayer $ in the 1st place this couldn’t have happened…

    Any other questions?

  10. Gary, the dangerous infidel says:

    #10 Paddy-O, no other questions for now except the original one. What would be your preferred “less government” solution in this case?

  11. Paddy-O says:

    # 11 Gary, the dangerous infidel said, “no other questions for now except the original one. What would be your preferred “less government” solution in this case?”

    Which I answered.

  12. chris says:

    #6 The surplus was caused by the full size tech bubble and the expanding real estate bubble, it was not the result of sound financial decisions.

    I think you shouldn’t be allowed to have more kids if the government is paying for the current litter. Just like CEOs; you want government money then you’re going to have to live with some restrictions.

  13. Olo Baggins of Bywater says:

    Please post another article asap so I don’t have to look at that woman.

    …pregnancy is fine, but this instance is not.

  14. Paddy-O says:

    # 13 chris said, “The surplus was caused by the full size tech bubble and the expanding real estate bubble, it was not the result of sound financial decisions. ”

    The surplus was caused by spending less than income. Just as the current mess was caused by spending more than the RECORD amount of revenues coming in during the last several years.

    You don’t follow the CA state budget and income do you?

  15. Gary, the dangerous infidel says:

    #12 Paddy-O, all you said was “if the Gov’t hadn’t given her taxpayer $ in the 1st place this couldn’t have happened…”

    Shall I make a logical inference that you advocate doing away with all state disability payments, or do you have a more direct answer to my question than your implied answer?

  16. Paddy-O says:

    #16 My answer was crystal clear the 1st time.

  17. Mac Guy says:

    Reminds me of that scene from Spaceballs…

    “Hello my baby, hello my honey, hello my ragtime gal!”

    “Oh no, not again…”

  18. Gary, the dangerous infidel says:

    #17 You were anything but clear, Paddy-O. You’d do quite poorly in a courtroom where they insist on direct answers 😉

  19. Dallas says:

    She’s just making more church donors

    In 2007 Pope Benedict XVI came out railing against the Italian people who he feels are having too FEW children and therefore causing the downfall of the Catholic religion (i.e. fewer kids = fewer paying Catholics growing up).
    He said this was “dangerous individualism” causing women to choose to do things other than kick out a new baby every year. Those women should dutifully be producing millions of new Catholics for the Pope.

  20. Rob says:

    Her stomach is almost as big as her ridiculous lips. Seriously though, she should be sterilized.

  21. Paddy-O says:

    # 19 Gary, the dangerous infidel said, “You were anything but clear”

    And you sound like a Sacramento politician…

  22. Gary, the dangerous infidel says:

    “And you sound like a Sacramento politician…”

    Them’s fightin’ words, Paddy-O 😉

  23. Paddy-O says:

    # 23 Gary, the dangerous infidel said, “Them’s fightin’ words, Paddy-O ;-)”

    Sorry, I should never liken someone I don’t know to a politician… 🙂

  24. 9yo says:

    What a keeper…. Oh Yeah, no guy wants her….ewwwwwww

  25. Cephus says:

    Just the delivery and intensive care is going to cost close to $3 million, that doesn’t count all of the hundreds of thousands this bitch has gotten over the years from welfare, worker’s comp, etc. You have to remember that she hasn’t worked a day in the last decade, every cent that she’s spent has come from the state and now, they’ll be shelling out big bucks to take care of her latest litter as well.

    Get her fixed and take her kids away.

  26. dusanmal says:

    @Garry&Paddy One should just look at the improvements NYC made during Giuliani admin’ and understand how to deal with disability and welfare payments in order not to end like CA. Any “free” disability and welfare must be very temporary and finite. After that period recipient could either find a work that he/she can do (and judging by this woman’s stomach, she could have easily worked even in construction, never mind things like cashier or such) or work for the Govt. for payments (ex. in NYC work in sanitation). Or there is no more money for free. Under such system she wouldn’t receive 100000$+ from the Govt. and would need to work, hence have less time to contemplate mega-children schemes.

    Finally, if she have still done such a stupid move (it is her right to make mistake , even of this magnitude) and is not able to support her children – Govt. should remove any rights she have over those children and put her first in jail for endangering welfare of all those kids, than in mental institution as I doubt she’d pass any psychiatric exam of merit.

  27. Paddy-O says:

    #27 Can’t argue with that.

  28. billabong says:

    John please get rid of this picture it is costing you page views.I’m not coming back for a couple of days so it will be buried in the archives.

  29. Sister Mary Hand Grenade of Quiet Reflection says:

    I think from now on she should just get it in the butt.

  30. madtownmoxie says:

    My question is how when she was on the gov’t dole out for work compensation for a bad back and neck, could she have been well enough to have children. I would bring her up on insurance fraud if she is healthy enough to have kids she was too healthy not to work.


1

Bad Behavior has blocked 6367 access attempts in the last 7 days.