At first, figuring out how pebble-sized rocks organize themselves in evenly-spaced patterns in sand seemed simple and even intuitive. But once Andrew Leier…started observing, he discovered that the most commonly held notions did not apply. And even more surprising, was that his findings revealed answers to NASA’s questions about sediment transport and surface processes on Mars.
Leier first studied loose pebbles and rocks, also known as clasts, when he was looking at sand dunes in Wyoming and noticed that the clasts seemed to spread away from each other in an almost organized fashion. It turns out, NASA was examining similar patterns on the sandy surface of Mars.
NASA proposed that wind was moving these rocks around. But Leier, who co-authored the study with Jon Pelletier at the University of Arizona and James Steidtmann at the University of Wyoming, says that would be impossible. They also discovered that rather than being pushed backward by the breeze, clasts actually tend to move into the direction of prevailing winds…
Instead, the loose sand around clasts is removed by the wind, causing scour-pits to form in front of larger clasts. Eventually, the rocks fall forward (or laterally) into the scours and then, the process repeats.
“What I find most interesting about this is that something as seemingly mundane as the distribution of rocks on a sandy, wind-blown surface can actually be used to tell us a lot about how wind-related processes operate on a place as familiar as the Earth and as alien as Mars,” says Leier. “It’s chaotic and simple at the same time.”
Leier’s article is published in the January 2009 edition of Geology. I have to thank him for solving a puzzle that’s bemused me on many of my walks on the Caja del Rio mesa across the valley from my home. Not that the solution will impede ghost and alien hunters.
Resembles schools of fish, they always swim up-stream.
Huh? Doesn’t the rock keep getting lower and lower each time it falls into the depression, eventually coming out of the other side of Mars?
The article NEVER uses the word “water”. Which is rather conspicuous in its absence. As if they don’t want to connect the lack of evidence of fluid water, to this theory of wind erosion, on Mars. We might possibly drawl the undesired conclusion, that there hasn’t been any large qualities of water on Mars. And all the “flow” formations may simply be the results of these unknown erosion effects. Clearly geo-science doesn’t know it all. And is still learning. And yet they’ve jump to the conclusion that oceans must have existed on Mars, for them to see certain erosion effects. And the possible presence of water is naturally important to support the idea that life had existed on Mars once (if not currently). So while the blowing sands of Mars can apparently account for much of what they’re seeing in photos. They still haven’t given up on all that water having been present. Water which magically disappeared, much the same way as the “Biblical Flood” waters, these scientists would scoff at. But it’s perfectly acceptable for them to “believe” in a mythical flood of water, on Mars. Even with little or no evidence of its existence, now. And what little exists is apparently explainable as wind effects (as I always suspected).
“A handful of explanations have been offered, but no one is certain precisely how the rocks of Death Valley’s so-called “Racetrack” lake bed move.”
http://fcit.usf.edu/fcat10r/home/sample-tests/death-valley/index.html
#4 – Leier’s study is precisely an explanation of dweebular fascination with Death Valley rocks.
#4… I was thinking about the Death Valley moving rocks too. This makes sense.
They’re martian turtles. Not rocks.
Grignak! Grignak! Grignak!
There is evidence of past water flows on Mars, and there is still ice under the soil. Just Google ‘water on mars’ and click the Phoenix and Mars Global Explorer missions.
Here’s an interesting article about past water on Mars.
And, yes, Grignak! He was a hero…
#9, Oh Galaxy Quest. One of my favorite movies!