A reminder as to who is actually behind the mess we are in. Curiously you never see or hear this stuff anywhere and only occasionally on FOX.




  1. Mr. Fusion says:

    Bullshit.

    The White House proposal was to remove oversight to the Treasury Department.

    Barney Frank, as were most Democrats, in favor of helping poorer people get home ownership. They were not then, nor now, ever pushing fraudulent mortgages.

    The financial collapse was not caused by the poorer income mortgages, it was caused by people losing their well paying jobs (usually to outsourcing) and being unable to pay their mortgages causing locally depressed housing prices. This escalated when gas prices hit over $4.00 a gallon.

    In 2003 Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac were in good shape and not holding what later became known as “Toxic Securities”.

    In 2003 the House was securely in the hands of the Republicans. Frank did not have the power to stall, let alone defeat, any legislation. This bill died because it was a bad bill that would have removed what regulation and oversight there was for the neo-con interpretation of oversight.

    So go ahead and blame Frank and the Democrats. It will make your little peckers stiffen.

  2. Randomized says:

    I didn’t know that Wednesday was Wdnesday in Canada.

  3. sargasso says:

    Fox, masquerading as a news channel, again. But getting most of it right.

  4. Ah_Yea says:

    It’s all true.

    The wreaking of our financial system, from the trade deficit to the housing crisis to the financial meltdown, starts at the Democratic doorstep. Yep, the Dems created this financial mess but cowardly won’t own up to it.

    The big mistake for the Republicans was not pushing back hard enough, and eventually going along with the flow (a trillion dollar war, anyone?)

    And now Obama want to print more money to cover more government spending programs which probably won’t help the economy, but will certainly devalue the dollar even worse than it already is, leading to huge increases in gas pricing and rampant inflation. (Remember the Carter years?)

    BTW, love the quote “Senator Obama did not weigh in on the matter”.

    Is there anything Senator Obama did weigh in on?

  5. bill says:

    SNAFU!
    And after listening to Barney this morning on TV… well, it’s ‘SAME OLD SAME OLD STUFF ALL OVER AGAIN’
    Nothing will happen. No one has the ‘juice’ to get anything done.
    Oh, they are supposed to sell all of their jets..
    I guess they could buy some ‘personal ones’ however…
    If your elders are still alive talk to them what it was like during the ‘depression’ … listen carefully.

  6. amodedoma says:

    Lot’s of politicians have been taking campaign contributions from fannie and freddie Mac, including McCain and Obama, sort of explains how they got the bailout bill passed so rapidly. Obviously deregulation of a gse is just like putting the kids in charge of the cooking jar, an invitation for abuse.

  7. Jägermeister says:

    Eight years and Bush couldn’t do anything to stop it? *LMAO* It’s not like there weren’t any warning signs

  8. freddybobs68k says:

    Its on fox news.

    The mouth piece for republican propaganda. As they consult with the white house on news stories…

    So what part am I supposed to believe? Except that republicans would like this explanation to be true.

    Honestly I’m sure democrats have their share of blame. But the idea it’s ‘all their fault’ when bush and his cronies have been in power for 8 years – the years when all this happened. Either makes the Bush Republicans _in power_ either totally useless and ineffectual, or part of the problem. Either way they get at minimum 50% of the blame, probably a lot more.

    So for now I’m with Mr Fusion.

  9. brian t says:

    Looking at this from outside the USA: WHO CARES? There’s nothing to win in the Blame Game.

  10. Ah_Yea says:

    #2 Mr. Fusion, stop proving you know nothing, please!

    The housing crisis didn’t happen because of job loss (Ugg, you can’t be that stupid to believe this!).

    The job loss happened because of the banking crisis begun by the collapse of the lending market caused by toxic securities backed by the bad housing loans!

    Did you follow that? No?

    Ok, lets see if you can follow this:

    The housing crisis started because of the readjustment of the Adjustable Rate Mortgages. (ARMS)

    When the ARMS readjusted, people who should never have been permitted the loan in the first place lost their homes because they could not afford the payments anymore.

    This resulted in huge bad debt and losses to the underwriting banks,

    Which led to the banks having to declare huge losses,

    Which led to the banks reducing or eliminating short term loans (not enough solvency),

    Which caused businesses which rely on short term loans (which most businesses need) to reduce staffing,

    Which led to huge layoffs.

    Do you understand now? No?

    Because of Democratic blocking of financial lending practice reform, institutions such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac did not get the proper oversight which oversight would have raised the question, “what happens when someone’s house payment goes from a barely affordable $900/month to $1500/month?”.

    Now we know.

  11. Phydeau says:

    It’s just amazing, the depth of self-delusion of the right-wing wackos.

    In their little fantasy world it was the Democrats, not the Republicans, who endlessly pushed the bogus Iraq war.

    In their little fantasy world it was the Democrats, not the Republicans, who deregulated anything that moves.

    So naturally, in their little fantasy world, all the problems we’re facing now are the fault of the Democrats, not the Republicans.

    Riiiiiiiiiight.

  12. Lou says:

    Seems like there is blame for many here.
    The rating Co’s have to take alot of the blame though. They were the gatekeepers.

  13. Mr. Fusion says:

    #11, Ah Yea,

    The housing crisis didn’t happen because of job loss

    I didn’t know we had a “housing crises. I thought it was a “financial crises”. Which in large part was caused by the value of mortgage securities losing their value because the value of the houses had depreciated to less than their paper was worth. When people could not pay their mortgages, because their jobs had disappeared, they defaulted, causing the whole house of cards to tumble.

    The job loss happened because of the banking crisis begun by the collapse of the lending market caused by toxic securities backed by the bad housing loans!

    Did you follow that? No?

    Say what? As long as the people were paying the mortgages the system worked. When overpriced homes glutted the local markets that depressed the entire mortgage field. As energy prices fueled further job losses, more and more people defaulted. The crash was not caused by fraudulent mortgages and securities, but it did fan the flames of the crash.

    Hint for you. Jobless people seldom have the means to pay high price mortgages. Or $4.00 a gal for gas.

    When the ARMS readjusted, people who should never have been permitted the loan in the first place lost their homes because they could not afford the payments anymore.

    Gee, that is similar to what I wrote
    They were not then, nor now, ever pushing fraudulent mortgages.

    When the ARMS readjusted, people who should never have been permitted the loan in the first place lost their homes because they could not afford the payments anymore.

    While too many home owners were given ARMs, they were not the significant cause of the collapse. As long as there were enough people paying on their mortgages, the security holders would remain solvent.

    Then you continue with a circular argument that is based upon false assumptions.

    Because of Democratic blocking of financial lending practice reform, institutions such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac did not get the proper oversight which oversight would have raised the question, “what happens when someone’s house payment goes from a barely affordable $900/month to $1500/month?”

    Please link to a source that backs up your contention that the minority party in Congress halted any financial reform of the FMs.

    Then show us how that proposed oversight would have prevented the practices that led to the crises.

    Then please show us how many people had toxic ARMs compared to those who lost their homes because of job loss.

    The entire crises was because the value of the paper held by the banks was worth less than their face value. That was caused by the homes glutting the market and selling for less than face value, thus depreciating the market value of all nearby homes.

    There is no evidence that the FMs were purchasing or holding any of these “toxic securities” in 2003. They were under the supervision of the Federal Reserve and FDIC at the time. Agencies pushing the “Regulations and oversight is bad” crowd.

  14. stopher says:

    Ah_Yea, Democrats weren’t the ones who bundled the loans and came up with obscure derivatives that multiplied their effect. You’re kind of glossing over the impact of the decoupling of risk in your little blame game.

  15. Arous says:

    Who would have thought that it was all Barny Frank’s fault!

  16. qsabe says:

    More FOX republican bullshit as they exercise their prerogative to serve as hindrances to any democratic attempt to fix what they screwed up. Didn’t they do that during the first depression they created in 1929.

  17. Ah_Yea says:

    Ok, fusion.

    Since understanding written text isn’t your forte, here are a couple of videos for you.

    They clearly show how we got into this mess in the first place.

    Not that I’m counting on you understanding this, either.

    http://tinyurl.com/7dxhwb
    http://tinyurl.com/743fvk

    I can’t dumb it down any further.

  18. Dallas says:

    Cheney says “nobody saw this coming”.
    ..It must be the democrats fault since Bush was ‘busy’.

    http://www.newspress.com/Top/Article/article.jsp?Section=BUSINESS&ID=565505600965184068

  19. bob says:

    1) blanket dismissal of Fox is stupid. Stop it. They are biased, as are ALL (no exceptions, _ever_) news sources. That does not mean that if they say it it isn’t true. Despite the convenience and fun to some of endlessly asserting that it does.

    2) The Bush administration was in power the whole eight years, but Congress hasn’t been republican that whole time – so don’t oversimplify.

    3) The clips presented are pretty persuasive – all you scoffers, let’s see the comparable clips from your favorite biased sources (CNN, for example) showing how various Democrats and bureaucrats were sounding the alarm and how various Republicans were poo-pooing the issue. I’ll be waiting.

  20. Phydeau says:

    Ah_yea says: I can’t dumb it down any further.

    Nah… it’s too easy.

  21. Phydeau says:

    #20 Bob

    Blanket dismissal of Faux is not stupid. There is plenty of evidence that they are indeed a mouthpiece of the Republican party. No other major media outlet could by any stretch of the imagination be called a mouthpiece of the Democratic party.

  22. MikeN says:

    Party line vote in the Senate Committee with a threatened filibuster shut down the reforms. Republicans should have pushed harder, just like with Social Security reform.

  23. MikeN says:

    I’m Christopher Lee and I say it is all Republicans’ fault. This is due to XY&Z. If you disagree, please post hard evidence to the contrary with links, and then some more links proving your first links are correct.

  24. Ah_Yea says:

    #23 MikeN. I agree. The big failure of the Republicans was that they didn’t push hard enough.

    As I see it, there was a deal with the devil here. I don’t push on reforming Freddie Mae if you don’t oppose my war in Iraq.

    Losers, all.

  25. Ah_Yea says:

    (Freddie Mae – Freddie Mac + Fannie Mae, just to be clear)

  26. BillM says:

    #20
    I saw a story on Fox yesterday showing a police officer in Oakland shooting a restrained young man. If I saw it on ABC, NBC, CBS or CNN I would be sick about it but it was on FOX…..must be bullsh–.

  27. AlGoreLeonia says:

    If Barney Frank or any person with a “D” behind their name shit on Mr Fusion’s forehead while he slept, he would awaken and upon discovery, declare that it’s for the good of the people and was done out of great concern….Now you see why Mr Fusion and those like him are called, “useful idiots”…Have you ever seen such absolute, blind, lock step adherence to an ideology no matter what the issue or evidence?

  28. GF says:

    There is plenty of blame to go around. Needless to say regulation was at the crux. Frank didn’t want regulation of Fannie Mae and Gramm on commodity futures, a.k.a. the the Enron Loophole. Why Clinton signed the Enron loophole into law is a mystery to me.

  29. gmknobl says:

    Geesh. Red herring right off the bat. Misdirection and deception. What the WH proposed would actually take power away from the people that should have been regulating things and put it in a separate place where the neocons would have wreaked their havoc unabated. And what many wanted back then was to use what money was available to help low income families get mortgages but not with high interest balloon plans which would blow up in their faces later.

    However, many neo-cons and neo-libs still felt deregulation of any sort was a bad thing, something the Bush people felt too and thus pushed for DEregulation. This type of thing has been going on since Nixon folks and none of it has turned out nice (I’m sure there are some SMALL exceptions.)

    Blame can be spread but most belongs to neo-cons followed by neo-libs. Any whitewash rewriting of history as Fox does here to make it look like Bush was trying to prevent this is just as a stated a whitewash and BS!

  30. Phydeau says:

    #29

    Have you ever seen such a clear example of projecting one’s faults onto others? Classic. The Bush worshipers defined absolute, blind, lock step adherence to an ideology no matter what the issue or evidence.

    Of course, if you read the polls now, most of them claim to have voted for the other guy — no one want to admit voting for Bush now.


1

Bad Behavior has blocked 6460 access attempts in the last 7 days.