Relationship Politics: Body Language Of The McCain Marriage
John McCain claims not to have known of his wife’s drug addiction, even at a time when she was supporting her habit by stealing drugs from a charity organization. If that’s true–if he actually didn’t know about his wife’s addiction–he demonstrates a lack of awareness that is panoramic. How do you fail to notice that your partner is stoned for months at a time? In John McCain’s case, there’s a simple answer and a more complex one. The simple answer is that he is a fellow-addict, known for his deep affection for the gambling table, as well as ties to the gambling industry. His addiction is the adrenalin-charged game of craps, a passion that is rumored to have cost him money and rifts in his marriage (Cindy being the one with the deep pockets who always had to bail him out.) When two addicts are married, they make an unconscious contract between them: If you agree not to confront me on my addiction, I’ll agree not to confront you on yours.
[…]
There’s a deeper answer, though, to the question of how partners gradually become oblivious to the painfully obvious. It speaks to something every conscious couple needs to know. A few years ago a car passed us with a bumper sticker that had an intriguing question written on it, “What are you pretending not to know?” It’s a question that all of us should ask of ourselves on a regular basis. It takes a heroic act of unconsciousness not to notice so profound a thing as drug addiction in one’s partner.
[…]
A relationship thrives only when people express abundant appreciation for each other.
The McCains earned the chilly distance in their relationship by a long history of ignoring these three simple rules of relationship. We as Americans must not ignore the impact of these rules on how we interact with our politicians. We think it’s time to demand that our politicians observe the rules of healthy relationships.For example, wouldn’t it be great to hear politicians take responsibility, rather than blame their opponents, for problems? We’d love to hear John McCain say to us all, “My friends, I take responsibility for my part in the economic mess we’re in. After all, I was one of the Keating Five! I helped Charles Keating pull off one of the biggest financial scams of all time. That scam cost the U.S. taxpayers billions, a heck of a lot more than all those airplanes I crashed. I urge my fellow Republicans to re-direct all the energy they spending in blaming Democrats to taking full responsibility for fixing this mess. I pledge to stop blaming and start focusing on positive solutions.”
3
Of course some crimes can be forgiven over time but it would depend on the gravity of the crime. Petty theft, I can see forgiveness. Murder is something I cannot even pretend to know what that would feel like for the victim’s loved ones and what it would take to forgive. The closest I have come is a work acquaintance who was killed by her lover, whom I also met. He never admitted to the crime although was convicted.
I see some difference in between Ayers and the lover who killed. But I also remember watching a reputable documentary on the Weather Underground and that some of the people who were killed weren’t meant to be. Yes it is stupid to bomb a building and hope that no one happens to be in it.
I am not saying that this crime should be FORGIVEN by any means. It isn’t relevant to the election though and certainly not to Barack Obama. I am sick and tired of people not caring enough to get off their asses to fix stuff in this country and being okay with the fact that our country has killed thousands of innocent people in the name of war. We don’t like people killing on our turf yet condone it in other countries.
Les, the video clip just says “I wish we would have done more”. That is an assumption to say that Ayers and his wife are referring to more bombs. Go figure that Fox News might leave the subject out of the sentence and conversation entirely for the clip.
I will look for the WHOLE interview elsewhere…
#62==Stephanie==I heard “I wish we would have been more MILITANT” and that they were lucky to have been born in those times.
Given the context of planting bombs and killing people, they need to be going in the opposite direction to deserve any slack.
In fact, I wonder how Ayres managed to get employed and all the rest. I’ve heard some of his colleagues defend him and they just sound spineless to me. I think being anti-government/wanting your government to be better AND killing people should leave enough room for other qualified instructors/education advisors?