There’s got to be more to this. A six year old doesn’t just come up with an idea like this. Given their reactions, will it turn out there’s a teacher or admin-run child porn ring behind this? Cripes!

Rampant abuse includes ‘sex club’ for six year olds

THREE boys aged six ran a sex club at a Brisbane state school demanding and receiving sexual favours from Year 2 classmates.

One outraged father claimed yesterday the school did not bother to tell him for more than a week that his son was involved.

He spoke out as similar stories emerged at state schools on the Gold and Sunshine coasts and Cairns, which indicate the sexual abuse of young students by other school children appears rampant.

The Brisbane father said his son was one of a trio seen performing various sex acts in a toilet block.

“The teachers interrogated the kids and made them write out statements without our consent,” he said. “The boys wrote down that they belonged to a sex club.

“The teachers didn’t make contact for six days. They sent me an email and said, ‘Sorry, we’ve been busy’.
[…]
His revelations came as uproar was sparked by yesterday’s Courier-Mail story, which told how the sexual assault of a seven-year-old girl by a young classmate was dismissed as a “childhood experiment” by a country school principal.
[…]
Meanwhile, on the Sunshine Coast, a gang of nine-year-old boys has been accused of “grooming” children as young as five to engage in sex acts. Investigators were told victims were rewarded with lollies.




  1. CZen says:

    Test run for Obama’s Sex Education Program.

    (Sorry it was too easy.)

  2. Jägermeister says:

    #1 – CZen

    That’s right… American kids don’t need no sex education… they figure it out themselves…

    On a side note… Google’s and Yahoo’s image search engines seems to filter their results… not only on porn, but political issues. When searching for Bristol Palin on both search engines, Google has the above image (in a small version) on page 8 on Google and Yahoo doesn’t even list it. But using Picsearch, it’s the first result.

    In Republican America, money can buy you censorship.

  3. Jägermeister says:

    [fixed – ed.]

  4. bobbo says:

    Jag==”Bristol Palin” your pic came up on the first page of my google image search. How could images be censored? Aren’t images sorted based on links to just like everything else in google?

  5. CZen says:

    #2 – Drunkard

    First you might want to invest in a sense of humor.

    Second you might want to caption a Pic. A random picture of a girl holding a child in a crowd says nothing about sex education.

    Last lay of the bottle its starting to kill brain cells.

  6. Jägermeister says:

    #4 – bobbo – your pic came up on the first page of my google image search.

    Now it does. Weird.

    How could images be censored?

    How can they filter the porn?

    #5 – Shit – A random picture of a girl holding a child in a crowd says nothing about sex education.

    Random? 😀

  7. CZen says:

    #6 – Worshiper of the porcelain god

    Yes random even if the girl is Bristol Palin. There is no other context to the picture. Where is she? Who is she holding (Understandably it’s most likely Trig)? All questions which could easily change the message you wish to portray.

    ;-P

  8. f_w says:

    Finally puts to rest the issue of sexual pleasure in those below 18 years of age.
    But i wonder if it was some kind of hazing thing instead.
    That seems awfully young indeed.
    Unless the whole story is bogus, or taken out of context of reality by some one.
    One should not forget, children has their own morals or lack of them, until compassion develops, everyone is a little monster.
    But i agree, they must have gotten the ideas from some where, cant have gotten it from the clouds, yet anyways.

  9. MarkP says:

    #1 You are an ignorant tool. Obama’s alleged sex education program for kinders was about teaching kids, in an age appropriate manner, about inappropriate touching and how to talk to parents and teachers when they think molestation might have happened.

    Re. the story: There must be more to this story. The fact that these kids were required to give statements without the parents’ permission or knowledge is a major red flag.

  10. Mr. Fusion says:

    #7, CZ,

    Either you are just plain STOOPID or you have been in a coma for the past couple of weeks.

    In #1 you wrote:
    Test run for Obama’s Sex Education Program.

    To which in #2 Jag replied:
    That’s right… American kids don’t need no sex education… they figure it out themselves…

    with a link to a picture of Bristol Palin holding her baby. The obvious point being (sarcastically put) that American teens continue to have babies. Bristol Palin’s mother has loudly said that sex education should not be taught in schools and abstinence should be. Her daughter is an example of that failed policy.

    Your response in #5 was:
    First you might want to invest in a sense of humor.

    Sarcasm may be funny, or cutting, or anywhere in between. I found Jag’s comment funny. Your mileage may differ depending upon the number of brain cells you have.

    You then add:
    Second you might want to caption a Pic. A random picture of a girl holding a child in a crowd says nothing about sex education.

    That picture and the context do not require any more explanation than that given by Jag’s link. If you are a complete moran or comatose for the past two weeks, or any combination you might not get it. In which case you need more help than I care to give.

    8)

  11. RBG says:

    Kids today… Where do they get their ideas from?

    Certainly not 100+ channel television or the internet environment for as we all know from anti-censorship advocates – who are only trying to prevent a take-over by goose-stepping shock-troops – that parents are able to continuously and simultaneously monitor all their children’s media encounters no matter where their children may be, or otherwise instill in their children exactly the right life skills – such as the ability to read “viewer discretion advised” – to prevent inappropriate viewings.

    RBG

  12. dvdchris says:

    They probably saw internet porn or saw older siblings engaging in sexual activities.
    A good example why we do need age appropriate sex education as early as 1st grade (or earlier…kids as young as 5? Cripes!)

  13. OvenMaster says:

    #2: Filtering in Google Images is easily switched off.

    On the Google home page, click Preferences, then under SafeSearch, choose “Do not filter my search results”, then click “Save Preferences”. Make sure you allow cookies to be stored or else you’ll have to do this every time you start a Google session.

  14. f_w says:

    This is hardly a result from watching/finding some images.
    So anyone who thinks that kind of censoring will stop this stuff from happening is a fool indeed.

  15. Mister Ketchup says:

    I did this when I was six as well. I haven’t matured much since then either.

  16. Gary, the dangerous infidel says:

    When I was a kid, we had much stricter guidelines. I wasn’t allowed to join my first sex club until I was ten, and even then I still had to keep my grades up to remain eligible.

    Kids today have it so easy.

  17. Jägermeister says:

    For the love of God… let the priests teach your kids about sex.

    #10 – Mr. Fusion

    Thanks Fusion… it’s pretty sad it had to be explained to him.

  18. Mister Ketchup says:

    #17 – I learned about sex from my preacher. I couldn’t sit down for a week.

  19. Jägermeister says:

    #18 – Mister Ketchup

    LMAO

  20. CZen says:

    #10 Mr Fusion

    Bristol Palin is still pregnant. Unless your stupid enough to believe that Trig is her son. Check Sarah Palin’s Wikipedia page.

    Either way, the comment and picture are way off mark for this post.

    #18 Mr Ketchup LMAO

  21. Jägermeister says:

    #20 – Shit – Unless your stupid enough to believe that Trig is her son.

    There’s no evidence that Trig is Sarah Palin’s son.

    Either way, the comment and picture are way off mark for this post.

    But “Test run for Obama’s Sex Education Program.” wasn’t? Double standards, my friend… You must be Republican.

  22. #20 – Sea Zen

    >>Unless your stupid enough to believe that
    >>Trig is her son. Check Sarah Palin’s
    >>Wikipedia page.

    Oh yeah. That really clears things up. Did she take that DNA test and the results haven’t been put up on Wikipedia?

    They do mention that “Palin supports teaching creationism in public schools.”; “In October of 2007, she signed the “Christian Heritage Week” Proclamation[189] which ‘reminds Alaskans of the role Christianity has played in our rich heritage'”; “A widely-circulated opinion piece calls Palin a theocrat and says that her values ‘more resemble those of Muslim fundamentalists than they do those of the Founding Fathers.'”; and “Palin spoke to a group of graduating ministry students at her former church, where she urged them to pray “that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending [U.S. soldiers] out on a task that is from God”. Not mention that she “asserted that “God’s will” was responsible for the Alaskan national gas pipeline project.”[197][198]

    Yeah. That’s just who we need running this country. No matter WHOSE son Trig’s is.

    DNA test, Sarah?

  23. bobbo says:

    Cant we all just get along?

    I was going to post just what CZen did, but he beat me to it.

    Humor can be difficult. Funny ha, ha or funny “isn’t that sad.”

    So, Posting with Reference to Obama with a counter of Bristol Palin can together be read as both being ha, ha, both being isn’t that sad, or there can be a switch from one to the other.

    I have my own opinion on which way it went, but its only my opinion. Notwithstanding how confrontational and anti-authoritarian (and liberal) I try to be, I’m always looking for goodwill and agreement/learning and satisfaction.

    It could be true.

  24. Harry Armpet says:

    #15, Ketchup,

    But at least you have matured some. It seems that too many of the wing nuts religious crowd haven’t matured at all. If that is a cause or result of their stance (wide, semi-wide, or spread eagle face down) I can’t answer. I’m not really in to Republican sexuality or pig love

  25. Harry Armpet says:

    #20, EZ,

    If you truly believe Trigg is Sarah Palin’s baby, I have a used earmark to sell you.

    Here is a picture of Sarah Palin when she was supposedly seven months pregnant.

    Add to this that Bristol missed the previous fives months of school with mononucleosis, an illness that seldom keeps anyone down for more than two weeks.

    The report that Bristol is being home schooled isn’t plausible as her mother is ultimately in charge of the education system. The younger children were still public schooled. So who was teaching her? Todd?

    Then looking at the picture Jag linked to, Trigg is a pretty big kid for seven months, as are most Downs babies. He appears to be close to 20 lbs. That would have put him fairly close to the 10 lb mark when born. Now, go back to that picture of Sarah Palin at seven months. A premature baby wouldn’t be very large at birth. Sarah is a small woman, she would have been much more “swollen” than she appears.

    Then there is the situation of her being in Dallas, her water breaks prematurely but she hangs around and gives her speech, then flies home with a stop in Seattle where she phones her Wasilla physician. Now, any responsible* mother would have sought medical advice / treatment when her water broke. Any responsible physician would have advised her to seek treatment right away. The flight attendants did not notice any problem on either flight. Thus someone lied.

    Then there is the report that the baby’s father apparently told several others that he got Bristol pregnant.

    I don’t give two hoots who the mother is. I do care that someone is lying while on the public stage, show casing her children and grandchild when her platform includes the wing nut philosophy about abstinence only being taught. This is just another Republican lie.

    * Off subject here, but do we really want someone this irresponsible in line to be President?

  26. Harry Armpet says:

    #17, Jag,

    Thank you.

    I’m wondering though, maybe CZ has a point. Besides the one between his ears and up. This could be just the reason early sex education is needed.

  27. Mr. Fusion says:

    Ooopps, forgot to change the name back.

  28. Jägermeister says:

    #26-27 – Mr. Fusion

    Oops… 😉

    Sexual education is needed. CZ is a proof of it.

  29. RBG says:

    25 Harry:

    Given the known higher risk of Down’s Syndrome for older mothers:
    17 year old: 1 in 1,565
    43 year old: 1 in 49
    Down’s Syndrome Association
    http://tinyurl.com/5b9z5h

    And the unlikely serial pregnancy mathematics: Trig born April 18, 2008 and Bristol now 5 1/2 months pregnant (as will be confirmed fairly soon)…

    The question that should be asked is do we really want someone as irresponsible as yourself in line to vote.

    RBG

  30. RBG says:

    25 Harry:

    Given the known higher risk of Down’s Syndrome for older mothers:
    17 year old: 1 in 1,565
    43 year old: 1 in 49
    Down’s Syndrome Association
    http://tinyurl.com/5b9z5h

    And the unlikely serial pregnancy mathematics: Trig born April 18, 2008 and Bristol now 5 1/2 months pregnant (as will be confirmed fairly soon)…

    The question that should be asked is do we really want someone as irresponsible as yourself in line to vote.

    RBG


1

Bad Behavior has blocked 11621 access attempts in the last 7 days.