 |
BOGOTA (Reuters) – A disgraced ex-lawmaker who threw Colombian politics into turmoil by saying President Alvaro Uribe’s re-election was tainted by corruption added body to the scandal on Tuesday by appearing naked on the cover of a magazine.
Yidis Medina was found guilty last month of taking illegal favors from government officials in return for voting for the constitutional amendment that permitted the 2006 re-election.
Monthly men’s magazine SoHo showed a curvaceous Medina posing nude while in jail, her hands covering her breasts in one shot as she looks peacefully into the distance. The 12-page photo spread is titled “Body of Crime.”
In the accompanying interview, Medina doesn’t explain why she posed for the magazine but says she is ready to leave politics behind. “What I want is to get out of political life, which has brought me so many unwelcome things,” she said.
Helzerman, I’m sure you’re completely hittable, sharp knees and all.
Your hormones have overruled your brain and now Yidis Medina has the story of Columbian voting fraud in a widely read American blog.
You’ve been completely pwned.
>>Would you hit that?
The bigger the cushion, the better the pushin’.
Better “that” than some pointy, bony Olive Oyl look-alike, scrawny ribs poking out through emaciated flesh.
It’s a test of where you land on the gay-straight continuum:
100% straight guys don’t mind seeing 100% of women naked.
There are exceptions and qualifiers, of course, but that’s the truth of the matter.
Whenever I hear guys insulting the looks of some woman, I always assume they are accidentally outing themselves.
… as for this specific woman. I think she doesn’t look too bad for someone getting carted-off by Colombian police.
How would Julia Roberts look under those conditions?
#3 – Mr. Allen
>>Whenever I hear guys insulting the looks of some
>>woman, I always assume they are accidentally
>>outing themselves.
OK then. Here’s something to assist you with with your needs:
http://tinyurl.com/6yeb8w
I try not to click on links without more information.
I’m guessing it is some grotesque woman. Look, I acknowledge that illness, highly advanced age, deformity or freakishness are the exception.
But the exceptions don’t invalidate the principle:
Totally straight guys are not picky about which women they see naked.
When guys are picky, it sets off the gaydar.
Maybe this analogy will help:
When my kid is picky about food, I figure he’s not really that hungry.
When some guy is picky about women, I figure he’s not really that straight.
#7 – Mr. Allen
Are you a homophobe? Why the compelling need to classify people on the gay-straight continuum? Why the finely-tuned gaydar?
As to the refusal to click on the link, suit yourself. I guess you must have a little of the gay gene in your DNA as well, hmmmm?
This was really true comedy. Columbia is quite the violent country. It is nice to see someone poking fun at brute force – even if it was just for a second.
I’m down with the gay thing. They are who they are and it’s none of my business.
I have to say, though, that I get weary of self-loathing closeted gays who go around being misogynist or bashing gays and generally inflicting their issues on the rest of us.
I wish they’d get their personal crap together and just like who they like and not bash others.
That’s what well adjusted people, of any orientation, do.
#9 “Columbia is quite the violent country. It is nice to see someone poking fun at brute force – even if it was just for a second.”
Truly. I sponsored a female doctor who emigrated from Bogota. It was an eye opener for me concerning professional women in that country. What this woman has done is truly remarkable.
>>They are who they are and it’s none of my business.
You’re disavowing your pursuasion? Oh gosh. This is terrible!
Bringing new meaning to the legal term “Habeus Corpus”
>> Mister Mustard said, on July 12th, 2008 at 10:28 am
>> You’re disavowing your pursuasion? Oh gosh. This is terrible!
When I was younger, I had a few guys try to persuade me but I wasn’t curious! 🙂
Seriously… are you picky about women? Do you insult the looks of those you don’t prefer?
If so, why?
As for me: I just like women generally — in all the shapes, sizes and colors.
Like most 100% hetero guys, I’m not that picky!
I don’t think I’d let her sit on my face, she’d pop my head like a zit.
#15 – Mr Allen
>>Like most 100% hetero guys, I’m not that picky!
I’m with ‘dro on this one. That is total desperation. While I do have various things I prefer about a woman, and some things are downright skanky (like tramp stamps and steel studs through their lips), I generally keep my opinions to myself, at least in real life.
You sound like a confused dog that doesn’t care if he’s humping a bitch in heat, the sofa, or the leg of his owner.
And it’s been my experience that guys who vocally insist that they are “100% hetero” are more like Chris Cooper in “American Beauty”. Hardassed stud motherfucker neo-Nazi ex-Marines….until they start trying to kiss ya in the garage.
**BUSTED!!**
#1 – QB Yes, I am completely hittable, and yes, my hormones frequently overrule my brain (so?) but I’d only be “pwned” if I cared that she was given additional coverage – I don’t. I think it’s funny that an ugly woman posed nude for a 12 page spread. I’m shallow. Don’t confuse me with the politics editor – I’m the fun one.
#3 GregAllen – I don’t know what this does to your “outing” theory, but I’m a woman. And for the record, I would NOT hit that.
#18, Mr. Mustard said, “And it’s been my experience that guys who vocally insist that they are “100% hetero” are more like Chris Cooper in “American Beauty”.
So you admit that you have “experience” with those guys. Busted!
#20 – Mr R
>>So you admit that you have “experience” with
>>those guys. Busted!
Yeah, I’ve been hit on by guys like Mr. Allen. How is that being busted?
#19 – Helzerman
>>And for the record, I would NOT hit that.
So many protestations from some many “100% heterosexuals”.
Haw.
This is actually funny!
The lady doth protest too much, methinks! 😉
helzerman said: “Don’t confuse me with the politics editor – I’m the fun one.”
LOL. That was the point. You fell into a whole world of politics with the post.
As for being fun, I hope you’re not missing out on a whole world of crazy, sweaty, ass spanking fun. Playboy bunnies are one thing. Imaginative, holler at the moon kind of women are a whole other.