The long campaign to forge a new dispensation for the European Union descended into panic and uncertainty yesterday when Ireland turned its back on its 26 EU partners and voted down the Lisbon Treaty.
EU leaders in Brussels and governments across the union, particularly Germany and France, were stunned by the Irish verdict, which amounted to a huge vote of no confidence in the way the EU is run.
The referendum in Ireland was the sole popular vote in the EU on the grand plan to give Europe a sitting president and foreign minister, and reconfigure the way the EU is governed. The result left the project severely wounded, perhaps fatally.
The Irish voted by a 7% margin, 53.6 to 46.4, against the treaty, which has already been ratified by 18 EU countries and is expected to be endorsed by the other eight.The result left Europe’s leaders with a giant dilemma over what to do next. A summit next week in Brussels was originally planned as a celebration. The Irish result is particularly painful for Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, who masterminded the new treaty last year, and for the French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, who was relishing the central role of ushering in a new European era over the next six months of France’s EU presidency.
Democracy and independence are hard to swallow – for some. The big fish doesn’t always get to swallow the little fish.
#31–QB==you argue only for a status quo, a country/union unable to react to changed circumstances. Very bad social policy. Course, there are pro’s and con’s to any and every set of governing rules. I think as a general rule, that a supermajority vote for change of basic philosophical approach is better than a simply majority, and better than requiring 100%. Its “practical.”
#33–Mike==The other states or most of them did agree according to rules in place. We good citizens of the USA don’t vote to approve treaties and compacts. Why would you want to hobble the EU with rules we don’t follow ourselves?