Scanning through Google news I thought it was a weird picture match to show a picture of Bush grinning like a creep posted next to the articles about child porn making it look like he was looking at porn or a kid or something. Another weird Google juxtaposition job.
For Kindle and with free ePub version. Only $9.49 Great reading.
Here is what Gary Shapiro CEO of the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) said: Dvorak's writing sings with insight and clarity. Whether or not you agree with John's views, he will get you thinking and is never boring. These essays are worth the read!
Subscribe to Main Blog feed here:
Subscribe to Comments too (below):
Bad Behavior has blocked 9500 access attempts in the last 7 days.
Looks like a winning submission to ARF.
This would be a great post under “Caption This!”.
I think Google needs to work on their algorithm. I’ve found several errors with mismatched images.
Just recently when Ted Kennedy had to go to the hospitality, they posted an image of JFK.
My interpretation of this array of digital ink blots is a president who is against child porn and making supporting laws against it. Maybe you are looking at this through “bash colored glasses”.
um, 2003 law. signed by Bush. something that has been mentioned in the stories. there’s the connection.
not google’s fault that he looks so damn creepy in virtually every photo.
I saw one of these a couple of weeks ago. Big rise in unemployment figures accompanied by a pic of His Majesty King George with a huge grin on his face.
A story about the Iraq War might have a picture of George Bush, so why not this?
Remember on 9/11 when Bush was reading that sheep book upside down — WITH CHILDREN PRESENT?
I’m guessing Supreme Court triggered the W images, as his SC was big news/big fodder a while back..
Also what #s 4&5 said, W signed a bunch of the laws that are referenced in articles.
Maybe even the lead story link has that pic as one of the pics in article, captioned “Prz Bush, signing a bill that would make a grin like this illegal in the presence of children”
Any comments on the case? Obama listed 3 current justices as ‘sensible’, and 2 of them were the no votes.