ABC News

Bone-white stretches of salt, leached up from the lifeless soil, lay like a shroud over the high desert where a paranoid Charles Manson holed up after an orgy of murder nearly four decades ago. Now, as then, few venture into this alkaline wilderness — gold-diggers, outlaws, loners content to live and let live.

charlesmanson.jpg

But a determined group of outsiders recently made the trek. They were leading forensic investigators searching for new evidence of death — clues pointing to possible decades-old clandestine graves.

And the results of just-completed follow up tests suggest bodies could indeed be lying beneath the parched ground. The test findings — described in detail to The Associated Press, which had accompanied the site search — conclude there are two likely clandestine grave sites at Barker Ranch, and one additional site that merits further investigation. For years, rumors have swirled about other possible Manson family victims — hitchhikers who visited them at the ranch and were not seen again, runaways who drifted into the camp then fell out of favor. The same jail house confessions that helped investigators initially connect the band of misfits living in the Panamint Mountains to the gruesome killings that terrorized Los Angeles hinted at other deaths. Manson follower Susan Atkins boasted to her cell mate on November 1, 1969, that there were “three people out in the desert that they done in.” Other stories surfaced. In the absence of bodies, they were forgotten. Last month, equipped with cutting-edge forensic technology, the investigators assembled in the ghost town of Ballarat for a 20-mile ride in all-terrain vehicles to the ranch.

I remember reading this statement from Susan Atkins in the book Helter Skelter by Vincent Bugliosi, and often wondered why police never followed up on other murders claimed by the group. Perhaps because they weren’t Hollywood celebrities but drifters and hippies.




  1. Thomas says:

    I think the article answers your question. At the time, they had no solid evidence and really no means to effectively search out in the desert. In addition, there is an admittedly banal argument to be made regarding resources. If Manson and his gang were at fault for any potential killings in the desert and you have them serving life sentences and most of the people killed will be difficult to identify, the Police do not gain much by conducting what could potentially be a wild goose chase. So, it would appear you hit the nail by stating that they did not investigate further because they were not sufficiently “important”.

  2. Mister Catshit says:

    40 years later might be a long time, but I am sure someone would like to know if their missing child is there.

  3. edwinrogers says:

    #2. I couldn’t agree with you, more. There is no statute of limitations on murder, for that very reason.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 9039 access attempts in the last 7 days.