Military experts sounded alarm Wednesday over the Japanese military’s ability to defend the country after one of its most advanced naval destroyers crashed into a fishing boat, leaving two missing…
The 165-metre-long Atago destroyer, returning from a visit to Hawaii, crashed into the tuna-fishing boat off the Pacific coast south of Tokyo.
“I may not come off as an expert, but I wonder whether the fishing boat was not detected by the radar,” said Yoshimi Watanabe, Japan’s state minister in charge of administrative and regulatory reforms.
“What if it had been a terrorist boat on a suicide bombing?” he said.
Watanabe probably violated Japan’s Homeland Security laws by even asking that question.
“hey, did you hear something?” Blub…blub…
The “small boat” problem is a major known vulnerability of our heavy naval forces, that, combined with more recent Chinese and Russian hypersonic cruise missiles, makes our big boats into nothing more than massive, expensive coffins. The Millennium Challenge 2002 utterly exposed this weakness to the whole world;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Challenge_2002
After the Millennium Challenge 2002, the navy should have completely reevaluated its strategy, but in the end, the money is in big iron, even if it is strategically and tactically stupid.
Japanese Navy Officer graduates of McHale’s Navy School of Navigation !!!
PT 109?
J/P=?
Despite the picture, I would think a tuna boat is pretty big.
Commercial radars with anti-collision alarms have been available for decades. This ship would have at least three radars, with navigation and weather on constantly, along with lookouts. I’m sure they saw the other vessel, but some confusion in avoidance commands resulted in a collision.
I’ve been told by several that my 37 foot boat is radar Invisible
A few points…
So in summary, this is not surprising considering how most small fishing boats are operated.
I was on an American aircraft carrier when we hit and crippled a Soviet submarine (or it hit us depending on who you ask). Ended up with a sub prop blade embedded in the hull. This was during the middle of the Cold War. Talk about not knowing the threats around us.
#9, Ron,
Good points. I immediately thought of the American sub vs Japanese training vessel.
Most of you should understand this.
Radar, Sonar…
You originate from 1 spot and it spreads OUT from there.
to reflect it must hit something SQUARE/perpendicular TO the signal, and it can come back.
Both use different forms/frequencies to do different things.
The main problems:
SIZE of object, and HOW LOW in the water it is.
There is a GAP…Its like the OLD GRID paper in math class.
The Farther OUT the MORE you can see, but NOT identify.
If you aim to LOW, you SEE?? WAVES…