Creationists rewrite natural history – Telegraph — — The big news in England is the sudden restructuring of the BBC including massive layoffs. Since this is a non-profit organization paid for by taxes, exactly what changed? Until recently the organization was hyper-critical of Bush and the right-wing. But has this perhaps been changed to a new Christian fundamentalist direction? Are they now kow-towing to creationists? I think so. Curiously the first evidence of this appears in licensed content broadcast in, of all places, Holland.
The world’s best known wildlife broadcaster, Sir David Attenborough, has called on the BBC to stop Christian fundamentalists from deleting references to evolution from his documentaries.
Censored versions of Sir David’s award winning programmes have been broadcast in Holland without any references to evolution, speciation, descent and timescales of millions of years, after being censored by Christian creationists who are opposed to Charles Darwin’s ideas.
“Instead of saying “70 million years ago, something happens,” they say “a very long time ago something happens”. They also omit paragraphs such as: “This is inherited from my warm-blooded ancestors,”” Sir David told the Telegraph. “I would much rather they kept to the letter, as far as that is possible, of what I said.”
Weird. I inserted an “” space code and it caused Italics.
#63 – JimR,
No problem. I wasn’t that offended, though didn’t recognize it as humor. (my bad) Now you’re starting to sound like you’re ready to go bonobo with the whole bunch on this blog though. While emulating bonobos is a worthy goal, I don’t know if I’m quite ready for that. I can’t even say whether it’s health for reasons or just too much vasopressin in my veins.
Seriously though, thanks for the compliment. I’m probably going to need to throw darts at my ego for a while to get it to pop and come back down.
If you have any insight on the subject though, I’d love to know what kinds of things I could say, not say, or tone down to be more convincing to the other side. I have such a hard time understanding even the most basic aspects of the philosophy. For starters, why is it a positive and desired attribute to have the ability to wholeheartedly believe fairy tales? Isn’t this called gullibility in other circles? Isn’t it even sometimes referred to as “drinking the kool-aid’?
M Scott, thanks for asking my opinion, as I rarely get asked. 🙂
I’ve been very busy of late, so I hope you don’t mind if I leave it for a few days so I can choose my words without rushing.