Well, there is a mole in the picture
It is, on the face of it, a frankly random connection, as random as the distribution of those highly pigmented blotches tends to be. But the answer, according to researchers at King’s College, London, is yes. The effect is even quantifiable: if you have always resented your 100-plus moles, you can now take comfort from the fact that you will probably live six or seven years longer than someone with only 25 or so of the pesky things. That is, if a malignant melanoma doesn’t get you first.
The answer – 15 years of research (and more than 900 sets of twins) later – was to be found in telomeres, strands of inactive DNA at the ends of each of our 46 chromosomes. They are at their longest when we are born, and shorten as we age; the shorter they are, the less time we have left.
The twist is that they shorten at different rates, depending on what else is going on: genetic inheritance, for example, or early heart disease – or some environmental factors: smokers tend to have shorter telomeres. People with lots of moles tend to have longer telomeres than people of the same age with fewer moles. So count – literally – your blessings. Unless, of course, they get larger, or start to itch.
I haven’t finished counting, yet.
Shit………I guess im going to be the first to go out of all my friends…….lol
I don’t know about moles, but you live longer if you have breasts.
For a longer life, try Telomere Extenders (pat. pending) soon to be available in most DNA junk foods.
I get those extender ads all the time in e-mail…uh wait…Nevermind.
I’m just glad Cindy Crawford reproduced, genes that good should not be wasted they should be passed on so later generations can enjoy them also
My back is full of moles, but fortunately the hair covers all of them. 😉
Oh… Is that Cindy Crawford? I pretty much forgot all about her. Pretty just isn’t good enough to keep my attention.
We have moles….mostly in the back, behind the barn and corral. 🙂
What was the question? Would I have sex or eat?
Some New York reporter did an article about a month ago on American men not having much sex drive. I thought she was an idiot; that American men were avoiding American women as being too risky to mess with, what with the lopsided divorce and domestic violence laws (male = guilty, no matter what).
Are most posters here too young to be interested, or did she have a point?
#2
I don’t think man boobs count.
#9
And that’s why gay sex is better.
Angel you horny bastard!
#9 – I would say a good portion of the posters here aren’t drawn to a thread like this because the topic isn’t that interesting, and the picture isn’t work appropriate. To try to correlate it to the bullshit you referenced is, at best, humorous.
So this is like a life line thing. Please read my moles for my future.
#12
It must really be lonely being the Net Nugent of geekdom with your Macs and your Republican POVs.
Wow…
i have moles, i always felt really insecure about them, but know iv read this its kinda boosted my confidence; lets just hope its true hey:) haha.