yankscifi.jpg

Sci-fi writers join war on terror – USATODAY.com Here we go with the US government describing science fiction writers as crazed crackpots. Sheesh.

Looking to prevent the next terrorist attack, the Homeland Security Department is tapping into the wild imaginations of a group of self-described “deviant” thinkers: science-fiction writers.

“We spend our entire careers living in the future,” says author Arlan Andrews, one of a handful of writers the government brought to Washington this month to attend a Homeland Security conference on science and tech.
Those responsible for keeping the nation safe from devastating attacks realize that in addition to border agents, police and airport screeners, they “need people to think of crazy ideas,” Andrews says.

The writers make up a group called Sigma, which Andrews put together 15 years ago to advise government officials.

As George Morrow once pointed out to me: the science fictions writers tell good stories but their ability to predict the future is poor. They predicted flying cars and robots and never saw the computer and the way it emerged it began to appear in businesses in the 1960’s. Meanwhile, these people are hardly whack jobs who think in the sixth dimension. They’re writers who work for a living.

found by Roger Strukhof



  1. BubbaRay says:

    Wow, what a group — Larry Niven, Jerry Pournelle, Greg Bear. Top of their field. Wonder if they’ve contacted folks like Neil DeGrasse Tyson et al.

  2. BubbaRay says:

    John, Sci-Fi didn’t predict the computer? Oh, you mean the personal computer. Heinlein et al. did that many times in the 50’s. Ever see the movie “Colossus, The Forbin Project” ca. 1970? Now there’s a computer.

    For predictions, Isaac Asimov comes to mind. His three laws of robotics (sort of) are now being implemented in Korea for future tech:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6425927.stm

  3. ChrisMac says:

    No wonder “they” wanna squelch speech from the military

  4. Jägermeister says:

    #2 – John, Sci-Fi didn’t predict the computer? Oh, you mean the personal computer.

    I would say that was Edmund Berkeley in 1949.

  5. malren says:

    Heinlein predicted the cell phone, and not just the tiny handheld nature of the phone, but the ubiquitous nature of it, how a handheld would access the network, everyone would have one, etc. Voice, video recording and data, he was writing about it in The Star Beast, mid-1950s. Way before Star Trek.

    That alone is a big win for scifi writers.

  6. ChrisMac says:

    Only about 10,000 people knew what the net could really be before Trumpet came out.. (They prolly liked SciFi)

    Oh, And.. The future is alot clearer if you think with an open mind

  7. OmarThe Alien says:

    Talk about predictions: Arrakis=Middle East; Melange = Oil; Emperor Shaddam = GB; The Spacing Guild = Exxon, etc and the Fremen? Well, they thought about as much of Mau’dib as the Arabs think of Osama Bin Laden. I think Frank Herbert pretty well nailed that one.

  8. Lauren the Ghoti says:

    I know I’d put one Hell of a lot more stock in J. Pourn’s and Niven’s speculations on what terrorists might do than in anything some utterly imagination-free, asocial bureaucrat comes up with.

    Don’t lump them in there with the flying-car-and-robot crowd of decades ago; just how much genuine contemporary SF do you read, John C?

  9. Jägermeister says:

    #5

    Or, it could just mean that he was well aware of what science and companies were up to.

  10. BubbaRay says:

    #4, Jägermeister,thanks for the link, I’d forgotten about that one.

  11. bac says:

    What is so hard about coming up with crazy ideas?

    — crazy idea —
    Because of the energy crisis, the US government enact policies that piss of Venezuela. A group of people from Venezuela works their way to Mexico then crosses the border into America. This group then shops at Wal-Mart for bomb making supplies.

    Then one day, several suicide bombers cause havoc in several cities.
    — end of crazy idea —

    Coming up with these scenarios is pretty much easy. What is hard is trying to figure out how to prevent these kind of things. Another question to ask is are these scenarios preventable? Is there a time when you say these scenarios can not be prevented without completely changing the type of government in America? Is there a possibility that the American people will have to bear the responsibility that some people will die so that others will live with freedom? We already accept the deaths of the military that protects our freedoms but can we accept the death of normal citizens in order for freedom to continue is America?

  12. RBG says:

    0. I must be missing something here. But taking it at face value:

    First:
    “Here we go with the US government describing science fiction writers as crazed crackpots. Sheesh. – JCD”

    Then we have these from the original item:

    “…the wild imaginations of a group of self-described “deviant” thinkers…”

    “We’re well-qualified nuts,” says Jerry Pournelle…”

    “‘We talk to a lot of strange people and read a lot of weird things,’ Bear says.”

    John, do you actually read some of these things before deciding you can spin them into anti-(one particular)-government bumfodder?

    “The 9/11 Commission called the 2001 terrorist attacks a result of the government’s “failure of imagination.””

    ‘Nuff said?

    RBG

  13. ChrisMac says:

    “I’m not worried about the kids.. I’m worried about the adults”

    said by me.. just now

    #12- on quoting JCD

    John, do you actually read some of these things before deciding you can spin them into anti-(one particular)-government bumfodder?

    Only if it can be made total outrageous with ease

  14. TheGlobalWarmer says:

    I’ve been frustrated for years about how sci-fi writers are not given credit for what they’ve predicted and look what one of their own says. Hell even little things like flash mobs and headcasting were predicted decades ago.

  15. venom monger says:

    Just asking… but do any of these writers call the genre “sci-fi”? Back when I was peripherally involved in the community, “sci-fi” was pronounced “skiffy” and was a term of derision that the real writers hated. Call it “science fiction” or “SF”.

    But maybe all that’s changed. A lot of the people I knew haven’t published in years (decades) now.

  16. ArianeB says:

    There are three visions of the future which I believe were very prophetic and getting closer to reality. First, is George Orwell’s 1984. Second is Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World. Third is Sylvester Stallone’s Demolition Man.

    Government control of the population is far scarier than terrorism.

  17. BubbaRay says:

    Am I just an old cranky geek, or does anyone else miss the masters of the golden age of Science Fiction? Heinlein, Asimov, Clarke, Pohl (who I think still writes), Bradbury, Philip Dick, Sturgeon, Simak?

    I wish Clarke would come out of retirement and give us one more gem.

  18. venom monger says:

    Am I just an old cranky geek, or does anyone else miss the masters of the golden age of Science Fiction?

    Or? You’re both, maan.

    I miss those guys too. Especially Heinlein, one of the few (fiction) writers who actually changed the way I think, permanently. (Vonnegut was another.) My favorites were always the ray-guns-and-space-ships stuff… (I was disappointed when Heinlein switched from space operas to obsessing over boffing pre-pubescent girls. I have nevertheless used Jubal Hershaw as a primary role model.)

  19. TheGlobalWarmer says:

    #17 – the genre has definitely changed. There’s still “classic” style SF out there though. James Hogan comes to mind. David Brin. I, for one, thought the Killer B’s (Brin, Benford, Bear) second Foundation Trilogy was quite good. Vernor Vinge’s Realtime novels.

    (These are “recent” but thinking about it as I was typing, even these are reaching back a decade or so.)

  20. venom monger says:

    James Hogan comes to mind

    He used to be a neighbor of mine, and we’d go drink beer every once in a while until I pissed him off by telling too many Irish jokes.

    He does (still) write good hard-core SF.

  21. TheGlobalWarmer says:

    #20 – the one thing about JH that bugs me is his reversal on Evolution and endorsement of Intelligent Design. He even wove ID into the belief system of the Thuriens in the latest Giants novel, which was dissappointing. Excellent stories otherwise.

    What’s really dissapointing in SF is the schlock Hollywood gives us when there are so many books out there that could make great movies. With everything they spend on CGI and actor’s salaries, you can’t tell me the added cost of rights to a good book would break the bank.

    Real SF writers are some of our brightest and most forward thinking people. Getting them involved in any advisory capacity can only be a good thing.

  22. tallwookie says:

    #11 – I like that one – it seems almost plausible…

    I’m glad sci-fi authors are getting something good out of this so called “war on terror” Sci-fi writers have been influencing me for many years, and its about time they get some respect.

  23. BubbaRay says:

    #18, venom monger Jubal Hershaw as a primary role model.)

    Yes, he was always surrounded by babes 🙂 Front!! And a “fair witness.” Anne, what color is that house? Jubal, on this side it appears to be painted white.

    Now that’s a fair witness.

  24. Angel H. Wong says:

    Sci-fi writers assembled and paid to work for the goverment… They might as well start selling snake oil ’cause nothing sucks more than a goverment sponsored writer than a religion invented by a cheap sci-fi writer who didn’t want to pay his taxes.

  25. TJGeezer says:

    Seems to me “skiffy” (thanks, VenomMonger) is still going strong. Thinking at this moment of Richard Morgan’s Takeshi Kovacs novels, starting with Altered Carbon, as fine examples of gonzo writing and thinly disguised revolutionary lit. But there are many other first-rate SF writers practicing the trade, and the state of politics certainly invites the traditional SF role of satirizing current trends and puncturing holy delusions. Angel seems to feel government sponsorship will ruin a writer, but hell, maybe the writers will improve the government instead. Is it time for my meds yet?

  26. Lauren the Ghoti says:

    #17 – old cranky geek

    “Heinlein, Asimov, Clarke, Pohl (who I think still writes), Bradbury, Philip Dick, Sturgeon, Simak?”

    How could you forget John Brunner, Brian Aldiss, Philip José Farmer, Jack Vance and Eric Frank Russell?

  27. Angel H. Wong says:

    #26

    I miss ALL of them..

    The new crop of sci-fi writers are really lousy storytellers, not to mention many fantasy writers and their trilogies..

  28. BubbaRay says:

    #26, Lauren, I didn’t forget them. I just remember reading them later in life than the ones I mentioned. Brunner and Aldiss are favorites, as well as Vance. Farmer wrote many really good works, and unfortunately, I’m not very familiar with Russell. I think I’ve only read one book of his. Could you recommend a few? Thanks.

  29. BubbaRay says:

    Yay! I get the last post! (well, maybe). Global Warmer, Real SF writers are some of our brightest and most forward thinking people. Getting them involved in any advisory capacity can only be a good thing.

    Darned right. Imagination seems to somewhat lacking in the current (or some) past administrations. Hey, 1600 Penn., Ave,. beam me up Scotty, no intelligent life here.

  30. Bill says:

    Footfall, by Pournelle and Niven, is actually a story about how US authorities assemble a group of SF writers whose job it is to brainstorm ideas about repelling an Alien invasion of Earth


1

Bad Behavior has blocked 4871 access attempts in the last 7 days.