Twin brothers Raymon and Richard Miller are the father and uncle to a 3-year-old little girl. The problem is, they don’t know which is which. Or who is who.
The identical Missouri twins say they were unknowingly having sex with the same woman. And according to the woman’s testimony, she had sex with each man on the same day. Within hours of each other.
When the woman in question, Holly Marie Adams, got pregnant, she named Raymon the father, but he contested and demanded a paternity test, bringing his own brother Richard to court.
But a paternity test in this case could not help. The test showed that both brothers have over a 99.9 percent probability of being the daddy and neither one wants to pay the child support. The result of the test has not only brought to light the limits of DNA evidence, it has also led to a three-year legal battle, a Miller family feud and a little girl who may never know who her real father is.
As soon as Raymon was asked to pay child support, he demanded that he and his brother both take a paternity test. When the paternity test came back with the same results, he took the matter to the courts where Judge Fred Copeland ruled that even in light of the identical DNA tests and overlapping relationships, Raymon would remain the legal father of the child. Raymon hopes to continue appealing the decision.
“I want to go to the Supreme Court,” Raymon told ABC News. “If they can’t prove it’s me then they should throw it out of court.” And as for the child support, he said, “The state should eat it.”
The state should eat it? Nice attitude. The judge
should make them both pay child support.
I’m just trying to figure out how they could “unknowingly” be having sex with the same woman.
“the judge should make them both pay child support?” What if one of them had robbed a bank and the evidence couldn’t demonstrate who did it? Should they both be sent up the river? If one of them beat up an old lady and we didn’t know who, should we hang ’em both?
Silly comment.
I think making the brothers split the cost is a good answer in this case. Either way, due to being identical twins, both are genetically both father and uncle.
#1 – David Kerman,
They’re identical, not conjoined.
#2 But we know _both_ had sex wit that woman.
#2 – Janky-o,
Hmm…. You may have convinced me. Too bad I didn’t see your post before I posted. How about we take the King Solomon approach, cut the baby in half and … oh nevermind.
Just wow. I’d be willing to bet if we looked hard enough, we would find instances of Rapes committed by one or another of a set of identical twins. probably a Murder or two as well.
#3 – Misanthropic Scott
I wasn’t confused on whether or not they were attached.
but I would still think that twin brothers would eventually have a conversation about their sex lives and put two and two together.
Just wow. I’d be willing to bet if we looked hard enough, we would find instances of Rapes committed by one or another of a set of identical twins. probably a Murder or two as well.
maybe there should be a law against identical twins banging the same chick, i suppose it would have to apply to marriage too
Stupid duplicate posts >_
She should “eat it”. She carried it to term
#6 They covered that topic in an episode of CSI
Twins are the same DNA totally…And the Judge just has to do a deeper scan.
#7 – Sounds like she did a lot more than eat it.
Serves the whore right: No child support for you!
Man, and they think I’M a ho…
#2 – BAD example. To match this case…BOTH robbed a bank. I agree, split the difference until a better paternity test can be performed.
I see a Jerry Springer show in the making!
#2 – Robbing a bank? Well if they both admitted to “unknowingly” robbing a bank, but not that particular bank, then we might have something.
What we have here is case of 3 callous idiots and an innocent baby. Cripes if my niece needed help I’d be there in a minute, let alone my daughter!
What kind of creeps are these twins. I’m guessing they each only have ½ a moral gene.
Hey kids you always pay for pussy so split the child support.Tough shit.
Maybe SHE didn’t know it was two different people???
Funny, I didn’t think they looked that much alike!
http://tinyurl.com/2n6veg
Dont know whats worse. This story or the other story where a man proves during divorce proceedings the child from his marriage isn’t his by DNA but the courts still make him pay child support.
The move we need here is a modified Solomon with a full twist:
“Since the child needs a father, and we cannot decide between you two, I order that you both be cut in half and the child be given two halves. — Guards!!!”
#18…steve s….lol
The judge should order them both to pay, period.
#21, make both pay? Why?
Your fine Oxford legal training should have taught you that our society doesn’t punish those who are innocent. Or is it your Libertarian leanings that feel sorry for the mother? Would your confessed Republican admiration have influenced you that maybe one brother didn’t do anything? Do all conservatives say “fuck the law”, guilty until proven innocent?
The one brother is saying, prove it is me before assigning support obligations. From my understanding of the law, he is right. If the mother did have sex with both brothers, then obviously she can’t tell which one actually fathered the child.
Neither can be proven to be the father so let the slut take care of her own problem.
I wonder why she picked one as the father in the first place.
Actually Fusion, it’s my sense of fair play and anger over the system being gamed. These guys got what they wanted….free sex. But when it comes time to pay the piper, they are gaming the system, because their lawyers know they can’t be identified by DNA.
So, let the tax payer off the hook and make them both responsible for the kid. Better 2 wonderfully caring individuals pay the bills than the cold heartless tax payers.
well she didnt get her self that way.But i have also heard the same fathers get stuck witg a dna test saying you are the dad even though his closet double cousions has been with the same woman ,The woman happens to just pick out the one she ants for her babys daddy.that one takes the dna test saying he was the dad ,not giving the ewst of the gang a dna test .But its never thw little babys fought.