UCSF scientist tracks down suspect in honeybee deaths — I pose this question “are they kidding us?” because this supposed new discovery is over a year old everywhere but in the USA. By May of 2006 this exact finding was all over the place in Europe with the exact same bug. So a year passes and suddenly we make this discovery? The only reference to the research already done in Europe is the comment that researcher in Spain have “recently” shown that this bug can kill a colony. The problem is the supposed “recent” Spanish finding is two years old at least! This only constitutes “recent” if you are an archaeologist. Are we kidding ourselves here or what? What kind of reporting is this?

The following is from yesterday’s SF Chronicle.

A UCSF researcher who found the SARS virus in 2003 and later won a MacArthur Foundation “genius grant” for his work thinks he has discovered a culprit in the alarming deaths of honeybees across the United States.

Tests of genetic material taken from a “collapsed colony” in Merced County point to a once-rare microbe that previously affected only Asian bees but might have evolved into a strain lethal to those in Europe and the United States, biochemist Joe DeRisi said Wednesday.

DeRisi said tests conducted on material from dead bees at his Mission Bay lab found genes of the single-celled, spore-producing parasite Nosema ceranae, which researchers in Spain have recently shown is capable of wiping out a beehive.

“It is wise to strike a conservative note, because this is early data, but it is interesting,” he said.

Government scientists who have been tracking the phenomenon they call Colony Collapse Disorder were skeptical, however, saying the parasite had been an early suspect in the bee die-off but that they had concluded it probably was not responsible.

The following is from LAST YEARS Stratford-upon-Avon & District Beekeepers Association Newsletter:

Stratford-upon-Avon & District Beekeepers’ Association: May 2006 Newsletter — During the February meeting, Terry Clare mentioned a new species of Nosema that is devastating colonies in some European countries; many at that meeting seemed to be unaware of this new threat, so here are some details.

In 1996 a new species of Nosema was discovered in Apis cerana, the Asian honeybee, it received the name Nosema ceranae. An assumption was made at that time that this species was specific to A. cerana; however in 2005 Chinese scientists isolated the ‘new’ Nosema species in A. mellifera colonies in Taiwan. In the same year scientists in the Castilla – La Mancha Institute in Spain and the University of Madrid found Nosema ceranae in Apis mellifera in Europe for the first time. This disease vector is only able to be distinguished from Nosema apis, the classic Apis mellifera vector using molecular genetic techniques. The incidence of Nosema in Spain has increased from a level of 10% in 2000 to some 88% in 2004.

Eight colonies in Germany have already been diagnosed positive for N. ceranae and all of these colonies died. The Swiss, Italians, Germans and Austrians have been co-operating in a Europe wide research programme since 2002. In winter 2002/2003 the Nosema infection levels were around 38%. Results from trials in Spain seem to indicate that Nosema infestations are on the increase.

A worrying factor in the latest reports is that colonies appear to be being killed very quickly and losses are occurring during the course of the whole year – bees crawling on the ground in front of the hive is a classic symptom.

During the observations this winter colonies were noted making relatively heavy cleansing flights at 4ºC. This observation seems to indicate a severe need for the bees to defecate. A link to the new Nosema organism however cannot be made conclusively. There is very little known about the course of the disease and its symptoms in Asia.

Reference: ‘Asian Nosema Disease Vector Confirmed – Is this a new Infestation or only now discovered?’ Dr Wolfgang Ritter, Freiburg University. ‘Das Deutsche Bienen Journal’, March issue 2006.

Can’t our experts (or the reporters for that matter) even do a Google search to find out that this is very old news? The kicker? Our great American scientist has a half a million dollar genius grant from the MacArthur Foundation. Cripes. When you compare the newspaper article to the newsletter article in its entirety you shake your head in disbelief at how poorly the newspaper reporting compares to a honeybee newsletter.

Now there is one thing that is never suggested or mentioned. The possibility that the use of a chemical called Fumagillin which is has been used for years to kill Nosema apis may have bred this new bee killing super bug. Almost all of the American beekeeping newsletters out of the great agri-schools in the USA advocate the use of this Pfizer chemical, and often recommend almost casual if not cavalier use.



  1. Marc says:

    It was probably not in the Fox news so the majority of you folks missed it.

  2. ECA says:

    Abit OFF topic…
    BUT…
    I find it interesting that cities dont look at OTHER cities and States the SAME…
    When trying to find solutions to What CAN be done about certain problems…AND wind up spending 10-100 times the money saying “THIS MIGHT WORK” when other have proven WHAT DOESNT…

  3. Fred Flint says:

    North American media, especially news outlets, seem to be getting more and more careful about what they report or don’t report, often depending on whether a potential “culprit” is one of their largest advertisers.

  4. Pfkad says:

    #2, you bet. We love to reinvent the wheel.

  5. moss says:

    Hey, we live in a nation who calls their national sports championships – “world” championships.

    Even the international conventions used for posting scores and which teams are home teams are reversed in the U.S.. Obviously, “our” way is the best way. And I’ll bet most folks attending this discussion haven’t a clue what I’m talking about. No reason to notice if you don’t look at sports outside the U.S..

    Parochialism sucks. Always has – regardless of whose pitiful ego is the problem.

  6. Aaron says:

    Can we use this information to go after the “Killerbees”?

  7. ethanol says:

    I’ve said it before and I’ll type it again – SCARY! We are busy killing ourselves with pesticides, herbicides, fertilizers, etc. I don’t give a rat’s a$$ if organic is no better for you (as reported on many ‘news’ programs here in the USA), they don’t use the darn petro-chemicals to produce the produce, etc.

  8. Sounds The Alarm says:

    Boy, Bill Mahr is going to be pissed he can’t blame it on cell phones!

  9. Frank IBC says:

    Marc –

    Actually it was the NY Times that was pushing this “mystery” a few weeks ago, a year after the actual cause had been published.

  10. MikeN says:

    I think we need to ban cell phones just in case. This is really an unproven theory being pushed by people linked to the cell phone industry that wants to keep its profits. People really don’t need to use cell phones all that much. We need to have a large tax on cell phone usage so they only get used in emergency situations. We can’t take a chance of having all our bees disappear. These alternative theories are just to distract you from making real change.

  11. Ballenger says:

    The links below are two more perspectives on CCD. Maybe I’m wrong, but it looks like you can kiss your Honey Nut Cheerios good-bye. Maybe Union Carbide’s Gourmet Division can probably make something like honey-like from recycled Nikes and Chinese frog gonad gluten. So no worries mate!

    http://georgiafaces.caes.uga.edu/storypage.cfm?storyid=3034

    http://www.ppdl.purdue.edu/PPDL/hot07/3-19.html

  12. mark says:

    Wow

  13. Bob Lilly says:

    The UCSF discovery *wasn’t* that the Nosema parasite kills bees.

    The UCSF researcher *isolated* the cause of bee deaths in the United States to the Nosema parasite, out of thousands of possible candidate microbes and theories.

    Isolating a particular cause for a phenomenon is very difficult. Before the researcher did this work, no one had any idea which of the many thousands of possible microbes or natural phenomena were killing the bees in the United States.

    Think about it – this is very important work.

  14. Angel H. Wong says:

    In the backyard we have 3 stingless bee hives they’re about the size of a popcorn kernel.

  15. Angel H. Wong says:

    #6

    Chances are that the africanized honeybees are more robust & resistant to the parasite, eventually leading the beekeepers to actually breed them because after all, these bees are much more efficient than the traditional ones.

  16. ethanol says:

    Ballenger (#11),
    The professor from Purdue has the “Rush Limbaugh Syndrome” of “don’t worry the scientists will figure it out before it is too late.” His quote “My opinion is that there is no reason for beekeepers to worry about mysterious ailments. Hopefully, researchers will be able to provide answers.”

    I say worry about it and try hard to find answers.

  17. noname says:

    It seem obvious:

    Why would a NEWS outlet publish a conclusive, or an accurate and fully descriptive report?

    Look at how many time the topic gets revisited when the NEWS gets it wrong. Every visit means eyeballs meet advertisement. NEWS is a profit making entity, it is not a public serving effort.

    When they get it wrong, to publicly air some disingenuous discussion of how they got it wrong. Whala, more hungry eyeballs visits meeting advertisement.

    Why would the NEWS satisfy intention of the reader? If they did, what would the reader do, end his/her quest/search to understand the topic.

    So, I ask again; why would a NEWS outlet publish a conclusive, or fully descriptive report?

    NEWS makes more money through disingenuous reporting then accurate and fully descriptive reporting!!!

    People are like a moth to a flame!!!!!

  18. hhopper says:

    I thought the report that the loss of bees was attributed to cell phones was asinine.

  19. MikeN says:

    Yeah just keep defending your superfluous extravagant lifestyle of cell phones while the planet is destroyed.

  20. noname says:

    Which menu option enables the “Bee Repellant” feature on cell phones?

  21. Aaron says:

    #15 Angel,

    You’re in South America right? have they actually started to use the “Africanized” bees for honey?…(they scare the crap out of me!)

  22. twitter says:

    Nothing regarding the use of cell phones and woo-woo illnesses has been scienfitically confirmed. How do you account for all the honeybees that are not dying that are happily making honey in my neighbor’s backyard, within easy distance to the cell phone tower? Whispery voice…..” It’s not the cell phones, it’s the microbes…”

  23. Mark says:

    Not that simple folks. There are many factors involved in the recent colony kill-offs. The truth is that amid the war zone of trying to keep bees these days, many beekeepers aren’t well informed of the CCD symptoms. I am also personally aware of the lack of accurate reporting of suspected cases to State Apiarists and researchers. It’s the old alligators in the swamp problem. Too busy trying to keep bees to learn the new rules. Last year I lost 80 percent of my bees. In hindsight, some of that may have been due to CCD as the symptoms seem to fit. This year I lost 20 percent and most of that was probably CCD related.

    Beekeeping has become extremely complex. Not like the good old days I remember when tagging along with pop to work the bees. Then all we had to worry about was AFB and proper management. Now you need to be an entomologist, a chemist, and a pathologist to keep bees. The many other expertise are a given.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 6845 access attempts in the last 7 days.