For decades, many scientists have criticized string theory, pointing out that it does not make predictions by which it can be tested. Now, researchers have developed a test of string theory. Their test involves measurements of how elusive high-energy particles scatter during particle collisions. Most physicists believe that collisions will be observable at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), which is set to turn on later this year at the European Laboratory for Particle Physics, commonly known as CERN.
“The beauty of our test is the simplicity of its assumptions,” explained Benjamin Grinstein. “The canonical forms of string theory include three mathematical assumptions – Lorentz invariance (the laws of physics are the same for all uniformly moving observers), analyticity (a smoothness criteria for the scattering of high-energy particles after a collision) and unitarity (all probabilities always add up to one). Our test sets bounds on these assumptions.
“Since we don’t have a complete understanding of string theory, it’s impossible to rule out all possible models that are based on strings. However, most string theory models are based upon certain mathematical assumptions, and what we’ve shown is that such string theories have some definite predictions that can be tested,” Ira Rothstein said.
It’s not a proof — it’s a test. Failing the test would prove that string theory is incorrect. Passing the test still wouldn’t prove the theory correct; but — till the LHC, even running a test like this wasn’t possible.
I feel a cat joke comin’ on…
The results of these tests will represent a major step forward in our knowledge of the universe no matter the outcome.
Holy Tomato Sauce !
It’s the Flying Spaghetti Monster, all along.
Just missing two orbs for the meatballs – but then again, it just proves that the FSM is a vegan.
Physics Al Dente
#1 – I had a bit my kitten developing a string theory of her own… but now I don’t feel so much like mentioning it 🙂
I have a feeling that these physicists are just stringing us along…
String theory has not produced a prediction. It is a beautiful mathematical idea but irrelevant to the fuller understanding of the universe, and therefore physics, unless it can in some way associate itself with reality.
#6 “String theory has not produced a prediction. It is a beautiful mathematical idea but irrelevant to the fuller understanding of the universe, and therefore physics, unless it can in some way associate itself with reality. “
I don’t think “irrelevant” applies. String theory has had a significant, negative impact upon funding for research into other theories. You might even say that string theory has effectively pulled the plug on “real” science.
I thought the point of this announcement was that there is now an actual practical test of string theory. That would seem to take it out of the realm of pure mathematics and make it pertinent to physics.
If it fails the test, “real” science gets funded. If it passes the test, we accept that there is supporting evidence for string theory and adjust our understanding of what constitutes “real” science.
Isn’t that how it’s supposed to work?
Somewhere, this evening, a physicist is asking a co-worker to pull his string as an evil grin slowly creeps across his face. And the co-worker is about to get a social science lesson on pulling strings.
3,
It does look like the Spagetti Monster…
Check out this video of Brian Cox explaining some of the cool stuff that’s gonna come with the 8-billion dollar LHC in Switzerland:
http://videocasts.eviscobroadcast.com/burda/dld07/2007-01-21_so_doesgodplaylego.mp4