And listening, too!

Police and councils are considering monitoring conversations in the street using high-powered microphones attached to CCTV cameras.

The microphones can detect conversations 100 yards away and record aggressive exchanges before they become violent.

The equipment can pick up aggressive tones on the basis of 12 factors, including decibel level, pitch and the speed at which words are spoken. Background noise is filtered out, enabling the camera to focus on specific conversations in public places.

In Holland more than 300 of the cameras have been fitted in Groningen, Utrecht and Rotterdam. Locations include city centres, benefit offices, jails, and even T-Mobile shops. The sensitivity of the microphones is adjusted to suit the situation.

Police and local council officials are still assessing their impact on crime, although in an initial six-week trial in Groningen last year the cameras raised 70 genuine alarms, resulting in four arrests.

Graeme Gerrard, chairman of the chief police officers’ video and CCTV working group, said: “In the UK this is a new step. Clearly there is somebody or something monitoring people speaking in the street, and before we were to engage in that technology there would be a number of legal obstacles.

“We would need to have a debate as to whether or not this is something the public think would be a reasonable use of the technology. The other issue is around the capacity of the police service to deal with this.”

Britain has more than 4 million CCTV cameras. The average person is filmed more than 300 times a day. The bar is being raised higher and higher — is this surveillance exclusively for criminals and terrorists? How do you prevent misuse and abuse?

How soon will it be common here?

Thanks, Joshua.



  1. ryan says:

    Seems to be getting like 1984 with every passing year. Maybe George Orwell was 30 years off?

  2. Bryan says:

    Awesome!!!

  3. Venom Monger says:

    How do you prevent misuse and abuse?

    Hehe EASY!!!!

    You re-define misuse and abuse into something that sounds much prettier.

    For example, we’ll call misuse “terror prevention”, and abuse will be “child pornography surveillance”.

    Everybody happy!

  4. tom j says:

    Can the Thought Police be far behind.

    Add to the “terror prevention” and “child porno surveillance” the “illegal music download” police and the “shrink wrap contract ” violators investigators unit.

    1984 could be 30 years off like comment #1 by ryan suggested.

    I would be curious as to what the four arrests in Rotterdam were for and the disposition of such cases as these.

    The Soviet prison system was full of innocent people. The guilty people were careful. The innocent people made the mistake of thinking that their innocence would protect them.

  5. Olo Baggins of Bywater says:

    Pennsylvania specifically prohibits voice recording without explicit permission…not even a sign on the door is good enough…that’s why you’ll never hear the audio on a security tape recorded in PA. There may be other states with similar restrictions. I thought PA was kinda wierd about that, but maybe not.

  6. Eddie says:

    “The Conversation” – 1974, Director: Francis Ford Coppola, with Gene Hackman.

  7. GreenDreams says:

    And beyond the random listen-to-everything nature of this story, remember that police need no warrant to use a laser mic on your windows to hear every word said inside. Yeah, they’re out there listening to you and your wife, lover, etc. What the hell happened to us?

    Hmmmmmm, I suppose turnabout’s fair play. How about a citizen group to listen in on the convos of politicians, officials and police? Maybe a bit of sauce for the goose would make them rethink this no-privacy direction we’re heading.

  8. OhForTheLoveOf says:

    Only because I want the NSA to knock on my door… I advocate the violent overthrow of the Unired States Government!

    I sure someone will now advocate I be tasered and jailed… But whatever… This nation is almost over anyway.

  9. Lee says:

    #7 Any group attempting this would be charged with “disturbing the peace” or “interupting a public thoughougfare” or perhaps even “assaulting an officer” (while handcuffed) and removed from society. Nothing is more dangerous than the truth.

  10. Ed says:

    DON’T POST ANYTHING IN CAPITALS. IT IS CONSTRUED AS SHOUTING AND MAY BE PICKED UP BY THE POLICE AND DEEMED AS AGGRESSIVE ONLINE BEHAVIOR.

  11. airwhale says:

    Just want to extend a big “Thank you for keeping me safe” to all the hard working employees at the Ministry of Truth.

    Big Brother for President – Now!

    (oh, that’s right. He’s already there.)

  12. Hernando says:

    Fascinating.

    When the G8 Economic Summit was held on Sea Island GA in 2005, the U S Government “wired” up portions of St Simons Island (right next door) with apparatus that would permit video and audio monitoring of on-street conversations by U S intelligence agencies. All clandestine — not like the well-marked truck in the blog. These devices were placed on rooftops and light poles, among other locations. They were said to be extremely sensitive.

    Really scary stuff.

  13. The other Tom says:

    Mobile CCTV
    …Watching out for me? Probably not

    ..Just watching me? Yep.

  14. C0D3R says:

    I advise whispering and carrying portable acoustic noise generators. Just like Web 2.0, it’s all about signal to noise.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 6537 access attempts in the last 7 days.