Scientists using NASA’s Swift satellite have spotted a stellar flare on a nearby star so powerful that, had it been from our sun, it would have triggered a mass extinction on Earth. The flare was perhaps the most energetic magnetic stellar explosion ever detected. The flare was seen in December 2005 on a star slightly less massive than the sun, in a two-star system called II Pegasi in the constellation Pegasus.

It was about a hundred million times more energetic than the sun’s typical solar flare, releasing energy equivalent to about 50 million trillion atomic bombs.

Fortunately, our sun is now a stable star that doesn’t produce such powerful flares. And II Pegasi is at a safe distance of about 135 light-years from Earth.

Yet in detecting this brilliant flare, scientists obtained direct observational evidence that stellar flares on other stars involve particle acceleration, just like on our sun. Rachel Osten of University of Maryland and NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., presents this finding today at the Cool Stars 14 meeting in Pasadena, Calif.

The key finding in the II Pegasi flare was the detection of higher-energy X-rays. Swift’s Burst Alert Telescope usually detects gamma-ray bursts, the most powerful explosions known, which arise from star explosions and star mergers. The II Pegasi flare was energetic enough create a false alarm for a burst detection. Scientists quickly knew this was a different kind of event, however, when the flare overwhelmed Swift’s X-ray Telescope, a second instrument.

Had the sun flared like II Pegasi, these hard X-rays would have overwhelmed the Earth’s protective atmosphere, leading to significant climate change and mass extinction.

And, of course, all the jive discussions about creationism would have come to an abrupt halt. Nature, galactic-scale space, neither pays any attention to insignificant creatures trying to make their existence seem important, the focus of some supernatural critter.



  1. Jimbo says:

    “And, of course, all the jive discussions about creationism would have come to an abrupt halt. Nature, galactic-scale space, neither pays any attention to insignificant creatures trying to make their existence seem important, the focus of some supernatural critter.”

    So isn’t it telling that it DOESN’T happen on our sun? That’s ’cause God’s got different plans! (Actually, it’s true, but still this particular logic is funny).

  2. RBG says:

    0. Run that by me again? God creates the entire Universe – from countless galaxys to every little quark therein (to say nothing of all the parallel universes) – but then goes on a coffee break ensuring the Earth might accidently get wiped out? Doh!

    RBG

  3. James Hill says:

    [comment edited as troll]

  4. Smartalix says:

    3,

    Read Inconstant Moon by Larry Niven.

  5. James Hill says:

    That edit shows the total lack of a sense of humor the editors of this blog have.

    Just because it’s election day is no reason to get pissy.

  6. OhForTheLoveOf says:

    #6 – See James… Of course you are a troll… But you are so good at it that I think you should be allowed to do it. I missed your comment and now I feel like I’ve missed the best moment of my day.

    I mean, if you managed to get edited for a comment relating to solar flares, then I really gotta know what you said.

  7. tallwookie says:

    #3 – gfx will be leet tho – people who watch movies for the plot are living the stone age.

  8. FRAGaLOT says:

    Oh Sun fart!

  9. Smith says:

    #5 A wonderful short story — science fiction at its best!

    “And, of course, all the jive discussions about creationism would have come to an abrupt halt. Nature, galactic-scale space, neither pays any attention to insignificant creatures trying to make their existence seem important, the focus of some supernatural critter.”

    Eideard, you have your reasoning ass-backwards. Without man, the Universe has no purpose. Man is the only reason the Universe has any significance at all. We give meaning to the birth and death of stars.

  10. Mr. Fusion says:

    #3, Sounds like a Disney Production.

    #10, Eideard, you have your reasoning ass-backwards. Without man, the Universe has no purpose. Man is the only reason the Universe has any significance at all. We give meaning to the birth and death of stars.
    Comment by Smith — 11/7/2006 @ 6:52 pm

    That sounds pretty arrogant. Have you figured out the meaning of life? Wait, I see a Monte Python skit in there somewhere.

  11. Roc Rizzo says:

    There goes my AM radio reception! Not to mention the Short Wave.
    These flares wreak havoc on AM radio!
    Guess I won’t be listening to O’Reilley, Rush, Franken, or Rhodes!

  12. Smith says:

    #11 The Universe is really just an energy imbalance that is seeking equilibrium. It is Man that gives it mystery, beauty and magnificence.

    Arrogant? I suppose so. But I choose not to be an ant.

  13. FRAGaLOT says:

    See that’s the problem with religion. It’s too easy to explain things we observe, since “God did that.” It requires no thinking at all. It’s just an easy cop out to explain things, and argue around scientific method and hypothesis.

  14. Smith says:

    #14 Was that comment directed at me? I’m not sure since at no time did I ever mention God or disavow the scientific method. But I’ll use your comment to make my point to the very dense: The Universe doesn’t think. Man does. So which is greater?

  15. RBG says:

    The Universe that made man?

    RBG


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 4608 access attempts in the last 7 days.